NCT05445960

Brief Summary

This study aims to 1) characterize skeletal muscle pH during/after tourniquet use and 2) investigate any relationship between intraoperative tourniquet use and postoperative functional measures and patient-reported outcomes.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
390

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
11mo left

Started Aug 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress85%
Aug 2021Mar 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 17, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 10, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 6, 2022

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 17, 2026

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 17, 2027

Expected
Last Updated

March 24, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

May 10, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change from Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Subscale at 12 Weeks

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) subscale, a Patient Reported Outcome survey used widely in orthopaedic literature, will be obtained and reported in points. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). A score of 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. For example a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population where as a score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Thus a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average referenced population. This could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending upon the concept being measured.

    Collected preoperatively and 12 weeks postoperatively

  • Change from Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Subscale at 12 weeks

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) subscale, a Patient Reported Outcome survey used widely in orthopaedic literature, will be obtained and reported in points. A score of 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. For example a score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population where as a score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. Thus a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average referenced population. This could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending upon the concept being measured.

    Collected preoperatively and 12 weeks postoperatively

  • Change from Baseline Foot and Ankle Ability Measure at 12 weeks

    Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), a Patient Reported Outcome survey used widely in orthopaedic Foot and Ankle literature, will be obtained and reported in points. Scores range from 0% (least function) to 100% (most function).

    Collected preoperatively and 12 weeks postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Pain Score

    Assessed preoperatively and at 2 hours and 3, 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively

  • Malleolar circumference

    Collected at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively

  • Calf girth

    Collected at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively

  • Mobility

    Collected at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively

  • Ankle range of motion

    Collected at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Tourniquet

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This arm will have a tourniquet placed around the thigh inflated to 250mmHg for the duration of surgery (until splint placed) or 2 hours, whichever is shorter, during ankle fracture surgery.

Procedure: Tourniquet

No Tourniquet

NO INTERVENTION

This arm will have a tourniquet placed around the thigh but NOT inflated for the duration of ankle fracture surgery.

Interventions

TourniquetPROCEDURE

This arm will have a tourniquet placed about the thigh and inflated to 250mmHg for the duration of ankle fracture surgery or 2 hours, whichever is shorter.

Tourniquet

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (18 years to 89 years) undergoing surgical ankle fracture fixation at OHSU

You may not qualify if:

  • sepsis
  • other significant long bone or internal injuries (including ipsilateral limb injuries).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oregon Health and Science University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Omeroglu H, Gunel U, Bicimoglu A, Tabak AY, Ucaner A, Guney O. The relationship between the use of tourniquet and the intensity of postoperative pain in surgically treated malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 1997 Dec;18(12):798-802. doi: 10.1177/107110079701801208.

    PMID: 9429882BACKGROUND
  • Konrad G, Markmiller M, Lenich A, Mayr E, Ruter A. Tourniquets may increase postoperative swelling and pain after internal fixation of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Apr;(433):189-94. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000151849.37260.0a.

    PMID: 15805957BACKGROUND
  • Younger AS, Kalla TP, McEwen JA, Inkpen K. Survey of tourniquet use in orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Mar;26(3):208-17. doi: 10.1177/107110070502600305.

    PMID: 15766423BACKGROUND
  • Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Licari FW, Voss MW, Bounsanga J, Saltzman CL. PROMIS and FAAM Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Foot and Ankle Orthopedics. Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jan;40(1):65-73. doi: 10.1177/1071100718800304. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

    PMID: 30282469BACKGROUND
  • Wilgis EF. Observations on the effects of tourniquet ischemia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971 Oct;53(7):1343-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5114697BACKGROUND
  • Cushing H. Pneumatic tourniquets: with especial reference to their use in craniotomies: Medical news; 1904.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ankle FracturesFibula FracturesAnkle Injuries

Interventions

Tourniquets

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesLeg Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Equipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Lara Atwater, MD

    Oregon Health and Science University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Lara Atwater, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2022

First Posted

July 6, 2022

Study Start

August 17, 2021

Primary Completion

March 17, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 17, 2027

Last Updated

March 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations