NCT06863688

Brief Summary

Lower extremity tourniquet utilization remains a controversial practice during the operative fixation of rotational ankle fractures and is often left to surgeon discretion. At our own institution, tourniquet use varies between surgeons with some providers using a tourniquet for every case, while others regularly do not utilize tourniquets. Despite benefits of decreased surgical time and decreased blood loss, many studies have cited negative outcomes associated with tourniquet usage including increased postoperative swelling and pain, increased wound complications, and increased risks of deep vein thrombosis. These outcomes have been limited to retrospective reviews and meta-analyses with few randomized control trials specifically evaluating these outcomes in ankle fracture patients. To better assess the impact of tourniquet use on ankle fracture postoperative outcomes, this randomized control trial seeks to 1) compare differences in postoperative visual analog scale pain scores for patients undergoing operative fixation of rotation ankle fractures with and without a tourniquet, while 2) evaluating rates of wound, thrombotic, and surgical complications associated with tourniquet use. Patients will be randomized by an Excel random number generator to a tourniquet and non-tourniquet group. Patients will remain blinded to randomization. The treating orthopaedic trauma surgeon will be notified by the PI of the study informing them of the randomization status to ensure appropriate tourniquet utilization the day of surgery. Patients will then undergo standard operative fixation and postoperative management as clinically indicated by the orthopaedic trauma team. Patients will follow-up at 2 weeks and subsequently every 4 weeks as is protocol at our institution. Patient charts will be reviewed for patient and perioperative factors, as well as postoperative complications (i.e. wound complications, need for repeat surgical intervention, and deep vein thrombosis).

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Nov 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress86%
Nov 2024Jul 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 24, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 5, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2025

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

January 5, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Ankle FractureTourniquetPROMPain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Visual Analog Scale Pain Levels

    VAS pain scores (0-10) will be assessed for the ankle immediately postoperatively in the post anesthesia care unit and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively.

    Post anesthesia recovery unit, 2 weeks postoperatively, 6 weeks, 3 month follow-up

  • Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cat V1.1 Pain Interference scores

    Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores including PROMIS Cat V1.1 Pain Interference (10-90, lower is better) will be completed at 6 week and 3 month follow-up appointments as part of standard clinic workflow.

    6 weeks, 3 months

  • Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cat V2.0 Physical Function Score

    Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores including PROMIS Cat V2.0 Physical Function (10-90, higher is better) will be completed at 6 week and 3 month follow-up appointments as part of standard clinic workflow.

    6 weeks, 3 month

  • Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale V1.2 Global Health Score

    Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores including PROMIS Scale V1.2 Global Health (15-70, higher is better) will be completed at 6 week and 3 month follow-up appointments as part of standard clinic workflow.

    6 weeks, 3 months

  • Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO) Yellow Flag 17-Item

    OSPRO-Yf 17 questionnaires will be completed at follow-up appointments as part of standard trauma clinic workflow and will be assessed at 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    6 weeks, 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative Complications

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Tourniquet Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to this group will have a tourniquet used during the operative fixation of their ankle fracture. Tourniquets will be inflated to 250 mmHg as is standard for our institution. Tourniquet will be deflated at time of closure.

Device: Tourniquet

No Tourniquet Group

OTHER

Patients randomized to this group will not have a tourniquet used during operative fixation of their ankle fracture. A tourniquet will be placed on the patient's operative extremity as a safety precaution, but will remain deflated for the duration of the procedure unless emergently needed for hemostasis.

Other: No Tourniquet

Interventions

Tourniquets will be applied to the thigh of the operative extremity during operative fixation of ankle fractures.

Tourniquet Group

No tourniquet will be inflated on the operative extremity during the operative fixation of ankle fractures.

No Tourniquet Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients \>18 y.o. undergoing ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation
  • Ground level fall as mechanism of injury
  • Closed injury

You may not qualify if:

  • Open Ankle Fractures
  • Vascular Injury Requiring Intervention
  • Lower extremity injuries on same side of ankle fracture
  • e) Active anticoagulation/bleeding disorder necessitating tourniquet use (Hemoglobin \<7, PT \>13, PTT\>35) f) Ipsilateral lower extremity trauma impacting immobilization g) Patients with peripheral neuropathy h) Patients undergoing ankle arthroscopy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52245, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Zhang W, Li N, Chen S, Tan Y, Al-Aidaros M, Chen L. The effects of a tourniquet used in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Mar 6;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-13.

    PMID: 24602486BACKGROUND
  • Benedick A, Rivera T, Vallier HA. Effect of Tourniquet Use During Ankle Fracture Fixation on Wound Healing and Infectious Complications. Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Jun;41(6):714-720. doi: 10.1177/1071100720907379. Epub 2020 Mar 1.

    PMID: 32116012BACKGROUND
  • Konrad G, Markmiller M, Lenich A, Mayr E, Ruter A. Tourniquets may increase postoperative swelling and pain after internal fixation of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Apr;(433):189-94. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000151849.37260.0a.

    PMID: 15805957BACKGROUND
  • Davey MS, Davey MG, Hurley ET, Kearns SR. Tourniquet Use During Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Sep-Oct;61(5):1103-1108. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Jan 23.

    PMID: 35219596BACKGROUND
  • Kruse H, Christensen KP, Moller AM, Gogenur I. Tourniquet use during ankle surgery leads to increased postoperative opioid use. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 May 12.

    PMID: 25979462BACKGROUND
  • Younger AS, Kalla TP, McEwen JA, Inkpen K. Survey of tourniquet use in orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Mar;26(3):208-17. doi: 10.1177/107110070502600305.

    PMID: 15766423BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ankle FracturesPain

Interventions

Tourniquets

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesAnkle InjuriesLeg InjuriesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Equipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Alex Demers, MD

    University of Iowa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients undergoing operative fixation of ankle fractures will be randomized to the tourniquet and no tourniquet groups in a 1:1 fashion. The treating orthopaedic trauma surgeon will be informed of the randomization status the day of surgery by the PI to ensure appropriate tourniquet utilization is executed during surgery.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2025

First Posted

March 7, 2025

Study Start

November 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD will not be shared secondary to data sharing regulations at our institution.

Locations