NCT05441878

Brief Summary

Patients with cirrhosis patients have a high incidence of sepsis which can trigger decompensation and may result in prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality. About 30%-50% admissions of patients with cirrhosis have sepsis at presentation and about 15% patients admitted to hospital develop sepsis during the hospital stay . After infection develops, the patient may develop acute kidney injury (AKI), shock, encephalopathy or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) further decreasing the chances of survival. In fact, sepsis in patients with cirrhosis is associated with 15% in-hospital mortality, approximately double that of patients without sepsis. So, sepsis is directly responsible for 30-50% of deaths in cirrhosis . Therefore, it is critical to manage sepsis early and appropriately in cirrhosis to reduce the complications and mortality. Early administration of fluids, source control and empirical antibiotics along with vasopressors if refractory shock are essential components of treatment in all patients with sepsis. Currently, the most accepted strategy for early sepsis management is a combination of early goal directed therapy (EGDT) and physiological parameters, such as urine output, lactate clearance, and administration of antibiotics, within 1 hour of presentation . The use of central venous pressure assessment is fallacious for gauging adequacy of fluid resuscitation in cirrhosis, and the difficulty of performing echocardiographic assessments in the setting of ascites and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is also well described .

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 15, 2020

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 26, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 1, 2022

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 1, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

April 26, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 28, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess IVC dynamics.

    To compare the IVC dynamics in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension

    At enrolment

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess IVC dynamics.

    To compare the IVC dynamics in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension

    At 6 hours

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess IVC dynamics.

    To compare the IVC dynamics in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension

    At 24 hours

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess IVC dynamics.

    To compare the IVC dynamics in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension

    At 48 hours.

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess dynamic changes in cardiac output, stroke volume and E/e' echocardiographic parameters.

    To compare the cardiac output in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension

    At enrolment

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess dynamic changes in cardiac output, stroke volume and E/e' echocardiographic parameters.

    To compare the cardiac output in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension

    At 24 hours

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess dynamic changes in cardiac output, stroke volume and E/e' echocardiographic parameters.

    To compare the cardiac output in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension

    At 48 hours.

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess new onset of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or acute kidney injury (AKI)

    To compare the new onset of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or acute kidney injury (AKI)in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension

    At enrolment

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess new onset of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or acute kidney injury (AKI)

    To compare the new onset of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or acute kidney injury (AKI)in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension

    At 48 hours.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Urinary marker of AKI (NGal)

    At enrolment

  • Change in urinary markers of AKI (NGal)

    At 24 hours.

  • Change in urinary markers of AKI(NGal)

    At 48 hours.

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension., and assess vasopressor requirement

    At enrolment

  • To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension., and assess vasopressor requirement

    At 24 hours

Study Arms (2)

20% Albumin arm

EXPERIMENTAL

20% Albumin in a dose of 20-40 gm per day as infusion over 12-24 h

Drug: 20% albuminDrug: Balanced salt solution

Balanced salt solution arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Fluid resuscitation protocol includes use of an immediate 500 ml bolus of crystalloid i.e., balanced salt solution (BSS) or 0.9% normal saline (Rescue phase), followed by 20 ml/kg fluid in the first 6 hours titrated to target MAP of \> 65mmHg.The second phase of fluid resuscitation (Optimization phase) will be performed as per IVC targets, attainment of lactate clearance, and LUS score to prevent overload.

Drug: Balanced salt solution

Interventions

Albumin arm for resuscitation fluid

20% Albumin arm

Only Balanced salt solution will be used.

20% Albumin armBalanced salt solution arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical/Imaging or Biopsy proven liver cirrhosis of any etiology who consent for enrolment.
  • Hypotension (Mean arterial pressure \<65mmHg or Systolic blood pressure \<90mmHg)
  • Aged between18-65 yrs

You may not qualify if:

  • Already received colloid or more than 2 litres of fluid without baseline echocardiographic assessment.
  • Already on vasopressors/inotropes
  • Severe pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
  • Active bleeding like variceal bleed
  • Cerebrovascular events
  • Chronic renal disease - End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)/ patient on renal replacement therapy
  • Admission to ICU following liver transplantation, burns, cardiac surgery
  • Brain death or likely brain death within 24 hours
  • Previous adverse reaction to human albumin solution
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Informed consent refused by patient or attendants

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Chandigarh, 160012, India

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Borzio M, Salerno F, Piantoni L, Cazzaniga M, Angeli P, Bissoli F, Boccia S, Colloredo-Mels G, Corigliano P, Fornaciari G, Marenco G, Pistara R, Salvagnini M, Sangiovanni A. Bacterial infection in patients with advanced cirrhosis: a multicentre prospective study. Dig Liver Dis. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(01)80134-1.

    PMID: 11303974BACKGROUND
  • Navasa M, Fernandez J, Rodes J. Bacterial infections in liver cirrhosis. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Oct;31(7):616-25.

    PMID: 10604106BACKGROUND
  • Wong F, Bernardi M, Balk R, Christman B, Moreau R, Garcia-Tsao G, Patch D, Soriano G, Hoefs J, Navasa M; International Ascites Club. Sepsis in cirrhosis: report on the 7th meeting of the International Ascites Club. Gut. 2005 May;54(5):718-25. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.038679.

    PMID: 15831923BACKGROUND
  • Moreau R, Hadengue A, Soupison T, Kirstetter P, Mamzer MF, Vanjak D, Vauquelin P, Assous M, Sicot C. Septic shock in patients with cirrhosis: hemodynamic and metabolic characteristics and intensive care unit outcome. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):746-50. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00008.

    PMID: 1597026BACKGROUND
  • ARISE Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group; Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Higgins AM, Holdgate A, Howe BD, Webb SA, Williams P. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1496-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

    PMID: 25272316BACKGROUND
  • Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RD, Jahan R, Harvey SE, Bell D, Bion JF, Coats TJ, Singer M, Young JD, Rowan KM; ProMISe Trial Investigators. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1301-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

    PMID: 25776532BACKGROUND
  • Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):172-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2331.

    PMID: 18628220BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver CirrhosisAcute-On-Chronic Liver FailureShock, SepticShock

Interventions

AlbuminsHanks Balanced Salt Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Liver DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesFibrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsLiver Failure, AcuteLiver FailureHepatic InsufficiencySepsisInfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Central Study Contacts

Madhumita Premkumar, DM

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor, Department of Hepatology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2022

First Posted

July 1, 2022

Study Start

August 15, 2020

Primary Completion

October 1, 2023

Study Completion

December 1, 2023

Last Updated

July 1, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Locations