Turkish Validity and Reliability of Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C)
1 other identifier
observational
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Perception of chronic pain and related disability; occurs through the interaction of physiological and psychological processes. Pain catastrophizing is a cognitive attribution style characterized by a negative mindset and magnification of pain. Catastrophizing in children has been associated with poor functioning and higher levels of pain. Catastrophizing during the transition to adulthood is defined as an important predictor of persistent pain and central sensitivity. The number of scales assessing pain and attitudes related to pain in children is quite low. In recent years, with the adaptation of the assessment scales used for adults to children or the development of new scales, the assessment of pain and pain-related attitudes in children has begun to be provided. Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), in 1995 Sullivan et al. for the purpose of comprehensive assessment in adults experiencing pain-related disasters. In 2003, Crombez et al. showed the validity and reliability of the scale in school-age children. For predictive validity, the scale was administered to children with chronic pain, and it was reported to predict the severity of pain and pain-related disability. Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C) scale; It is a self-report measure adapted from the Adult Pain Catastrophizing Scale used to assess negative thinking associated with pain. It contains 13 items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = "not at all true" to 4 = "very true". Substances; rumination (4 items, e.g. "When \[my child\] has pain, I can't get him out of my mind"), magnification (3 items, e.g. the child has pain\], thinking about other painful events"), and helplessness (6 items, e.g. "\[My child's\]\] When I have pain, I feel that I cannot continue"). Items are aggregated across subscales to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 52; higher scores are related to higher catastrophizing attitude. The pain catastrophizing scale was originally developed in German and later validity and reliability studies were conducted in different languages. The aim of this study is to question the Turkish validity and reliability of the "Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C)" scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2024
CompletedMarch 12, 2024
March 1, 2024
8 months
June 23, 2022
March 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C); It is a self-report measure adapted from the Adult Pain Catastrophizing Scale used to assess negative thinking associated with pain. It contains 13 items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = "not at all true" to 4 = "very true". Substances; rumination (4 items, e.g. "When \[my child\] has pain, I can't get him out of my mind"), magnification (3 items, e.g. the child has pain\], thinking about other painful events"), and helplessness (6 items, e.g. "\[My child's\]\] When I have pain, I feel that I cannot continue"). Items are aggregated across subscales to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 52; higher scores are associated with higher catastrophizing attitude.
12 months
Interventions
Personal and disease-related inquiries of the participants will be recorded in the demographic registration form. To assess the validity of the "Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C)" scale, the Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PEDSQL) 3.0 Arthritis Module, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) will be administered to the participants. In this way, the consistency of the developed scale with similar questionnaires that were previously reported to be valid will be examined. In order to determine the reliability of the "Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C)" scale, test-retest will be performed at one week intervals for the participants whose treatment has not undergone any change. The consistency of the scale will be determined by the data of the participants who have the first and second scale scores. Interviews will be conducted by face-to-face method.
Eligibility Criteria
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA); It is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood. It is a chronic autoimmune disease of unknown cause, in which arthritis occurs in one and/or more joints for at least 6 weeks before the age of 16. The average prevalence values found in studies conducted in various countries are between 16-150/100.000. In the study on the prevalence of JIA in our country, the rate was; It is stated as 64/100,000. Persistent pain is the most common and bothersome symptom of JIA, and pain in childhood arthritis is multifactorial.
You may qualify if:
- years old
- Agree to participate in the study
- Whose symptoms and medications are stable,
- Do not have a psychiatric disease that may affect cooperation,
- Patients with JIA who do not have heart failure and lung pathology at a level that will affect their daily living activities will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who cannot understand and follow the instructions will be excluded from the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pamukkale university
Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bilge Başakçı-Çalık, Prof
Prof.
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator PhD PT
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2022
First Posted
June 29, 2022
Study Start
October 15, 2022
Primary Completion
June 15, 2023
Study Completion
January 15, 2024
Last Updated
March 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03