Effects Of Muscle Energy Versus Counter Strain Technique on Pain, Function and Satisfaction Level in Planter Fasciitis
Comparative Effects Of Muscle Energy Technique And Counter Strain Technique On Pain, Functional Status And Satisfaction Level In Planter Fasciitis Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous studies has discussed the effects of muscle energy technique and counterstrain technique in upper trapezius and low back pain but no comparative study is found on planter fasciitis patients. In this study we are going to compare the effects of muscle energy technique and counterstrain technique with routine physical therapy in relation with pain, functional status and satisfaction level in planter fasciitis patients
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedApril 7, 2023
April 1, 2023
6 months
June 8, 2022
April 5, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain Intensity
Pain intensity will be measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Change in pain intensity will be measured at baseline, at end of first week, at end of second week
Function
Functional status will be measured by Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
Change in Functional Status will be measured at baseline, at end of first week, at end of second week
Satisfaction Level
Satisfaction level will be measured by Short-Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18)
Level of satisfaction will be observed at end of First Session, at end of first week, at end of second week
Study Arms (2)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive muscle energy technique along with routine physical therapy. This protocol will be given for 3 alternative days for 2 weeks . Each session will be of 50 mins. Data will be collected at baseline , at 1st week and at 2nd week.
Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will receive counterstrain technique along with routine physical therapy. This protocol will be given for 3 alternative days for 2 weeks . Each session will be of 50 mins. Data will be collected at baseline , at 1st week and at 2nd week.
Interventions
For Gastrocnemius muscle, subject will be in supine position keeping knee fully extended and therapist on affected side in walking position. The subject's ankle joint will be dorsiflexed until a resistance feel and will ask to hold this position and exert 20% of force towards plantar flexion for a period of 5 to 7 seconds. Resistance will be released and relaxation of 5 seconds will be given during which the ankle will was passively dorsiflexed to a new barrier. 5 repetitions will be given.
Therapist places thumb on tender point at plantar fascia insertion while patient in supine position with ipsilateral knee flexed. Plantar flex the toes and ankle while monitoring sore site with thumb, curling around tender point until monitoring thumb feels symptomatic relief. Supination/pronation of foot will be added if necessary. The position of ease will be maintained for 90 secs until tissues beneath monitoring thumb softens. Tender spot is re-evaluated once the foot is returned to neutral without moving the thumb. It will be repeated 3 times for 30 secs resting interval in-between
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 20 to 68 years.
- Both male and female.
- Patients are clinical diagnosed by the orthopedic surgeon.
- Patients present with pain that persist for more than 4 weeks in heel and planter surface of foot.
- Pain with the first steps after inactivity
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with history of ankle and foot fracture.
- Congenital or acquired deformity of ankle and foot.
- Patients with arthritis.
- Pervious history of surgery for planter fasciitis.
- Patients use an assistive device for walking.
- Patients use corticosteroid injection in heel.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ayesha Jamil, M.Phil
University of Lahore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2022
First Posted
June 21, 2022
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 months and ending on 36th month
Immediately after publication