Study Stopped
Investigator left the team
Study on the Efficacy of Infiltration of Upper Cluneal Nerves in Chronic Pain Related to Cluneal Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Lower back pain is a very common complaint in the Chronic Pain Clinic. Its etiology is nonspecific in 85% of the cases. In 1957, Strong and Davila reported that the superior cluneal nerves (SCNs) and middle cluneal nerves (MCNs) can be entrapped around the iliac crest, suggesting a causal relationship between this entrapment (SCN-Entrapment, SCN-E) and low back pain symptom. This is known today as "cluneal syndrome". Cluneal syndrome remains poorly investigated and is currently a diagnostic challenge. Various types of lumbar movements exacerbate its occurence. The most common theory regarding the origin of this pain evokes that is primarily due to a mechanical cause linked to stenosis or adhesions of fibrous tissue around the cluneal nerves causing distress. The hypothesis is that the investigator can reduce the pain related to the syndrome of superior cluneal origin thanks to a "volume effect" which aims to detach adhesions and/or aponeurotic stenoses that cause a distress of cluneal nerves. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the cluneal nerve block using theThomas Dahl Nielsen ultrasound based technique in patients with chronic low-back pain related to SCN-E. To this end, the investigator will compare physiological serum injection versus local anaesthetic injection, with the aim of reducing short-term pain and improving quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jun 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 21, 2023
February 1, 2023
4 months
June 8, 2022
February 16, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction of pain intensity in the acute phase of the treatment.
The pain intensity will be assessed using the numeric analogue scale (NAS) at 5 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes and will be compared with (the pain intensity at) the baseline. The patient rate the pain from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable)
up to 1 hour post-infiltration
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Reduction of pain in the late phase of the treatment.
up to 3 months post-infiltration
Impact of Pain on daily life
up to 3 months post-infiltration
Incidence of Side effects
up to 3 months post-infiltration
Study Arms (2)
Physiological serum Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe cluneal nerve block is performed under ultrasound using the Thomas Dahl Nielsen and Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen method. The patients are placed in ventral decubitus. A sensor of high linear frequency is moved toward the middle and posterior to where the aponeurosis of the transverse muscle and the thoraco-lumbar fascia meet, following the appearance of the thoracolumbar fascia and then the appearance of the posterior ilio-costalis muscle under the fascia lumbar area. The infiltration is carried out "in-plane", with a lateral towards the median axis direction, in a way, that it penetrates perpendicularly the fascia The physiological serum (NaCl 0.9%) will be injected, on each side, into the aponeurosis and the muscle in the area where the superior cluneal nerves pass. An easy separation of the thoraco- lumbar fascia and the ilio-costalis muscle is achieved during injection by slightly raising the needle towards the median axis as the space opens up gradually.
Ropivacaine Group
EXPERIMENTALThe cluneal nerve block is performed under ultrasound using the Thomas Dahl Nielsen and Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen method. The patients are placed in ventral decubitus. A sensor of high linear frequency is moved toward the middle and posterior to where the aponeurosis of the transverse muscle and the thoraco-lumbar fascia meet, following the appearance of the thoracolumbar fascia and then the appearance of the posterior ilio-costalis muscle under the fascia lumbar area. The infiltration is carried out "in-plane", with a lateral towards the median axis direction, in a way, that it penetrates perpendicularly the fascia The local anaesthetic (Ropivacaine) will be injected into the aponeurosis and the muscle in the area where the superior cluneal nerves pass. An easy separation of the thoraco- lumbar fascia and the ilio-costalis muscle is achieved during injection by slightly raising the needle towards the median axis as the space opens up gradually.
Interventions
The patients will receive 15 ml of Ropivacaine 0.375 % on each side.
The patients will receive 15 ml of physiological serum (NaCl 0.9 %) on each side.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient signed Inform Consent
- Patient diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral superior cluneal syndrome :
- Diagnostic points will be :
- a maximum pain at the trigger point on the back iliac crest, approximately 7 cm from the median line and 4.5 cm from the poster superior iliac crest. Palpation on this point causes pain reminding the patient's long-term pain),
- Palpation "rolled-palpated" at the buttocks provokes either pain, paraesthesia, or discomfort.
- The criteria of facial syndrome, sacro-iliac syndrome or radiculopathy are excluded.
- Low back pain during back movements.
You may not qualify if:
- Pain not associated to superior cluneal syndrome.
- Infection at the puncture point.
- Pain of suspected neoplastic origin.
- Allergy to local anaesthetics.
- Refusal of the patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (8)
Karri J, Singh M, Orhurhu V, Joshi M, Abd-Elsayed A. Pain Syndromes Secondary to Cluneal Nerve Entrapment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Aug 21;24(10):61. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00891-7.
PMID: 32821979BACKGROUNDRandomised trial of ultrasounded guidelines above or cluneal nerve block "Superior Cluneal Nerve Entrapment - Pubmed." Accessed February 7, 2021.
BACKGROUNDTalu GK, Ozyalcin S, Talu U. Superior cluneal nerve entrapment. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):648-50. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2000.18189.
PMID: 11097676BACKGROUNDIsu T, Kim K, Morimoto D, Iwamoto N. Superior and Middle Cluneal Nerve Entrapment as a Cause of Low Back Pain. Neurospine. 2018 Mar;15(1):25-32. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836024.012. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
PMID: 29656623BACKGROUNDRandomised trial of ultrasound-guided excess cluneal nerve block" Superior Cluneal Nerve Entrapment - Pubmed."
BACKGROUNDMorimoto D, Isu T, Kim K, Imai T, Yamazaki K, Matsumoto R, Isobe M. Surgical treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment neuropathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jul;19(1):71-5. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.SPINE12420. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
PMID: 23621641BACKGROUNDJournal of Prolotherapy "The Management of Cluneal Nerve closed Pain with Prolotherapy," July 10, 2018
BACKGROUNDHauser RA, Lackner JB, Steilen-Matias D, Harris DK. A Systematic Review of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 7;9:139-59. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S39160. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27429562BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Panayota Kapessidou, MD,PhD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Walid EL FOUNAS, MD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aikaterini AMANATIDOU, MD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2022
First Posted
June 21, 2022
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
October 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02