Diuretic Treatment in Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload Guided by Serial Spot Urine Sodium Assessment
DECONGEST
2 other identifiers
interventional
107
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a pragmatic, multicenter, interventional, parallel-arm, randomized, open-label trial to investigate whether a diuretic regimen, based on serial assessment of sodium concentration (UNa) on spot urine samples after diuretic administration and with low-threshold use of combination diuretic therapy, improves decongestion versus usual care in acute heart failure (AHF), potentially leading to better clinical outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2022
Typical duration for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 12, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 8, 2025
CompletedAugust 8, 2025
July 1, 2025
2.1 years
June 6, 2022
June 30, 2025
July 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mortality, Days in Hospital & Decongestion
The net treatment benefit is calculated for the hierarchical composite primary endpoint. Every patient from the intervention group is pair-wise compared with each patient from the control group to declare a winner or tie. The following criteria are sequentially assessed to declare a winner or a tie: 1. Any subject surviving until 30 days after randomization wins from a subject who died. If both subjects did not survive until day 30, there is a tie. 2. In a pair of subjects, both surviving up till day 30, the subject with the highest number of days alive and out of hospital or care facility during the 30-day follow-up window is declared the winner. 3. In a pair of subjects, both surviving up till day 30 with the same number of days alive and out of hospital/care facility, the subject with the greatest relative reduction in NTproBNP from baseline is the winner (rounded to the closest percentage with a minimal difference of 5%). If the difference is \<5%, there is a tie.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Renal Safety Endpoint
30 days
Hemodynamic Safety Endpoint
30 days
Natriuretic Peptide Change After 30 Days
30 days
Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) Change After 30 Days
30 days
Number of Participants With Successful Clinical Decongestion
30 days
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALApplication of a standardized diuretic schedule with following key components: * UNa assessment in spot urine sample after every bolus of loop diuretics with continuation of intravenous diuretics until absence of clinical signs of fluid overload AND UNa \<80 mmol/L * Loop diuretic dosing according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with higher dose for lower eGFR * Upfront use of intravenous acetazolamide 500 mg OD unless hypernatremia or metabolic acidosis * Upfront use of oral chlorthalidone 50 mg OD if eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m² OR hypernatremia * Full nephron blockade with intravenous acetazolamide 500 mg OD, intravenous bumetanide 4 mg TID, oral chlorthalidone 100 mg OD, and intravenous canrenoate 200 mg OD in case of diuretic resistance, defined as UNa \<80 mmol/L and persistent clinical signs of fluid overload * Provision of 500 mL intravenous Dextrose 5% with 3 g MgSO4 and 40 mmol KCl daily during intravenous diuretics
Control arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care for AHF. It is recommended to administer an intravenous loop diuretic dose at least BID (or through continuous infusion), with the aim of achieving a urine output 3-5 L per day until the patient is considered in an optimal volume status as is recommended by current guidelines. Urine electrolyte assessment in the control arm is not allowed as it is a key component of the studied intervention.
Interventions
Sodium concentration is measured on a urine spot sample, collected 30-120 min after administration of every protocol-specified intravenous bumetanide dose.
Upfront use of intravenous acetazolamide 500 mg OD as part of the diuretic treatment, unless hypernatremia (\>145 mmol/L) or metabolic acidosis (bicarbonate \<22 mmol/L) is present at the moment of the scheduled administration.
An intravenous bolus of bumetanide is administered TID, with dosing according to eGFR: 2 mg for an eGFR \>45 mL/min/1.73m²; 3 mg for an eGFR 30-45 mL/min/1.73m²; and 4 mg for an eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m². At any time diuretic resistance is encountered (persistent clinical signs of fluid overload with UNa \<80 mmol/L), a dose of 4 mg TID is used.
In case of hypernatremia (\>145 mmol/L) or low eGFR (\<30 mL/min/1.73m²), oral chlorthalidone 50 mg OD is added to the diuretic treatment. At any time diuretic resistance is encountered (persistent clinical signs of fluid overload with UNa \<80 mmol/L), oral chlorthalidone is provided at a dose of 100 mg OD. Chlorthalidone is never administered in case of hypotonic hyponatremia with serum sodium concentration \<135 mmol/L.
At any time diuretic resistance is encountered (persistent clinical signs of fluid overload with UNa \<80 mmol/L), intravenous canrenoate 200 mg OD is provided. Canrenoate is never administered in case of hypotonic hyponatremia with serum sodium concentration \<135 mmol/L or if serum potassium levels are \>5.5 mmol/L. If canrenoate is administered, oral mineralocorticoid receptor drugs are temporarily withhold until switch to oral diuretic treatment.
A maintenance infusion with 500 mL dextrose 5% and 3 g MgSO4 is started at an infusion rate of 20 mL/h upon the moment of first protocol-specified administration of intravenous diuretics and continued until switch to oral diuretic therapy. 40 mmol KCl is added if serum potassium levels are \<4 mmol/L. In case of hypotonic hyponatremia with serum sodium concentration \<130 mmol/L, dextrose 5% will not be provided and MgSO4 will be administered in 50 mL of normal saline (NaCl 0.9%).
If serum potassium levels are \<3.5 mmol/L at any time during the administration of intravenous diuretics, oral potassium supplements are provided as needed to keep serum potassium levels \>4 mmol/L
In case of hypotonic hyponatremia with serum sodium concentration \<125 mmol/L, a bolus of 150 mL hypertonic saline 3% is administered and repeated OD if necessary, until sodium levels are ≥135 mmol/L.
Upon complete resolution of clinical signs of fluid overload with UNa \<80 mmol/L, intravenous diuretics are switched to an oral schedule including: * Loop diuretics with dose \& frequency at the discretion of the treating physician * Chlorthalidone 50 mg if added for diuretic resistance at any time during the intravenous diuretic phase * Spironolactone 25 mg or another equivalent mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist
It is recommended to administer an intravenous loop diuretic dose at least BID (or through continuous infusion), with the aim of achieving a urine output 3-5 L per day until the patient is considered in an optimal volume status as is recommended by current guidelines.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 y/o and able to provide informed consent
- Hospital admission (anticipated stay \>24 h after randomisation) with diagnosis of acute heart failure according to the treating physician
- At least one of the following three signs of volume overload:
- bilateral oedema 2+, indicating clear pitting
- ascites that is amenable for drainage, confirmed by echography (no obligation to perform abdominal echocardiography, but necessary when presence of ascites is used as an entry criterion for the study)
- uni- or bilateral pleural effusions that are amenable for drainage, confirmed by chest X-ray or lung ultrasound (no obligation to perform chest X-ray, but necessary when presence of pleural effusions is used as an entry criterion for the study)
- Plasma NTproBNP level \>1,000 ng/L
You may not qualify if:
- No possibility to collect reliable urine spot samples after diuretic administration
- Administration of any diuretic within 6 h before randomisation, except for a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist or sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor as part of the patient's maintenance treatment for heart failure. Patients can still be included after withholding these diuretics for 6 h, after which randomisation can be performed if they qualify all other criteria.
- Severe kidney dysfunction, defined as an eGFR \<15 mL/min/1.73m² calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula and/or previous, current, or planned future renal replacement therapy
- Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg, or need for inotropes/vasopressor therapy at randomisation
- Any acute coronary syndrome within 30 days prior to enrolment, defined as typical chest pain with a troponin rise above the 99th percentile of normal and/or electrocardiographic changes suggestive of cardiac ischemia
- History of heart or kidney transplantation
- History of mechanical circulatory support
- Known obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, acute mechanical cause of acute heart failure (e.g., papillary muscular rupture), acute myocarditis, or constrictive pericarditis according to the treating physician
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Concomitant participation in another interventional study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vrije Universiteit Brussellead
- Roche Diagnostics GmbHcollaborator
- Jessa Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University Hospital Brussels
Jette, Brussels Capital, 1090, Belgium
Jessa Hospital
Hasselt, Limburg, 3500, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
Vanhentenrijk S, Verbeeck J, Kalpakos T, Vandoren V, Braeckeveldt L, L'hoyes W, Choustoulakis E, Roosens B, Tang WHW, Verwerft J, Verbrugge FH. Rationale and Design of the DECONGEST (Diuretic Treatment in Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload Guided by Serial Spot Urine Sodium Assessment) Study. J Card Fail. 2025 Apr;31(4):651-660. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.044. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
PMID: 39218247BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof. Dr. Frederik H. Verbrugge
- Organization
- University Hospital Brussels - Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frederik H Verbrugge, M.D.; Ph.D.; M.Sc.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Clinic/Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2022
First Posted
June 9, 2022
Study Start
June 12, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2024
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 8, 2025
Results First Posted
August 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- The study protocol will be shared through clinicaltrials.gov immediately upon release. The statistical analysis plan will be shared before database lock at the end of the study.
IPD will be made available upon reasonable request in adherence with transparency conventions in medical research and through requests to the chief investigator (Frederik H. Verbrugge, frederik.verbrugge@uzbrussel.be). The executive committee of DECONGEST has developed a comprehensive analysis plan and numerous prespecified analyses, which will be presented in future scientific presentations and publications. At a later time point, the full database will be made available in adherence with the ratified transparency policy.