NCT05410132

Brief Summary

The research goals of this randomized controlled trial are to determine the feasibility and the mechanism of change of iMBT that has been developed using the Acceptance Checklist for Clinical Effectiveness Pilot Trials. The primary research question is as follows: What is the effectiveness of the iMBT in relation to improvements on depressive symptoms among people with clinical depression, relative to a usual care control after the intervention and in 3-month follow-up? Secondary questions include the following: Which facet(s) of mindfulness (i.e., observe, describe, act with awareness, non-react and non-judgement) improved during the intervention? How does the growth trajectory of different facets of mindfulness relate to the improvement of well-being and reduction of ill-being? The investigators hypothesize that: H1 Participants in iMBT group will have greater reduction in depressive symptoms and increase in all facets of mindfulness and mental well-being, than the usual care group at post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. H2 Using latent growth analysis, the intraindividual growth trajectory of the monitor and acceptance facets of mindfulness would mediate the effect of iMBT on the intraindividual changes in depressive symptoms. H3 Using multi-group analysis, in accord with Acceptance and Monitor theory, the relationship between the growth trajectory of monitor facets of mindfulness and the growth trajectory of depressive symptoms will be moderated by the level of acceptance. People with greater acceptance of inner experience will benefit more from the change of monitor facets of mindfulness in iMBT.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
116

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 24, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 26, 2022

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 8, 2022

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

May 26, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

mental well-beingdepressionInternet-based Mindfulness-based Trainingonline

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) (Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001). It is a 9-item measure to access the severity of depression. PHQ-9 has been validated and used widely in the general population for screening and measuring depression severity. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 denote mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe level of depression respectively (range: 0-27).

    at baseline

  • Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) (Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001). It is a 9-item measure to access the severity of depression. PHQ-9 has been validated and used widely in the general population for screening and measuring depression severity. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 denote mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe level of depression respectively (range: 0-27).

    2nd week

  • Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) (Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001). It is a 9-item measure to access the severity of depression. PHQ-9 has been validated and used widely in the general population for screening and measuring depression severity. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 denote mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe level of depression respectively (range: 0-27).

    4th week

  • Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) (Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001). It is a 9-item measure to access the severity of depression. PHQ-9 has been validated and used widely in the general population for screening and measuring depression severity. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 denote mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe level of depression respectively (range: 0-27).

    6th week

  • Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) (Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001). It is a 9-item measure to access the severity of depression. PHQ-9 has been validated and used widely in the general population for screening and measuring depression severity. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 denote mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe level of depression respectively (range: 0-27).

    18th week

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Mindfulness

    at baseline, 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 18th week

  • Mental Well-being

    at baseline, 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 18th week

  • Credibility and Expectancy

    at baseline, 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 18th week

  • Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale

    at baseline, 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 18th week

  • Non-attachment

    at baseline, 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 18th week

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Internet-based mindfulness-based training group (iMBT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the iMBT group will be expected to complete an Internet-based mindfulness-based training delivered over a 6-week period via an internet e-learning mental health platform. They will be assessed at four different time points: (1) before intervention (T0), (2) 2,4 weeks since the commencement of group (T1,2), (3) 6 weeks after (i.e., when the intervention ends) (T3), (4) at 3-month follow-up(T4).

Other: Internet-delivered Mindfulness Based Training (iMBT)

Treatment-as-usual control group (TAU)

NO INTERVENTION

The TAU group will be advised to seek assistance from their usual healthcare provider when needed. They will be offered access to the Internet-based mindfulness-based course content after the study has ended.

Interventions

The iMBT developed for this study will be adapted from our team's previous study and the manual of mindfulness based cognitive therapy. The program is designed to be brief in nature, for example, participants will be asked to practice meditations for 15 minutes a day instead of the original 45 minutes a day, and each module is shortened to approximately 1 hour instead of the original 2.5 hours. This iMBT is comprised of six weekly modules on education about mindfulness, guidance on using mindfulness skills to manage symptoms, guided meditations (e.g., mindful breathing, mindful eating, mindful walking, body scan, acceptance, choiceless awareness and disengaging from thoughts exercise), and guidance on using informal mindfulness skills in day-to-day life. Readings, audio and graphics are included to explain the concept of mindfulness and overcome common difficulties associated with mindfulness practice.

Internet-based mindfulness-based training group (iMBT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants aged 18 years old or above
  • Have access to computer and mobile phone (since this is an internet-based therapy)
  • Score \>9 on PHQ9
  • Have the ability to read and type Chinese

You may not qualify if:

  • Self-reported presence of psychosis or bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, drug or alcohol dependence, current use of antipsychotic medications
  • Self-reported frequent suicidal ideation (more than half of the days in the past two weeks)
  • Completion of an online mental health program/research for depression in the past 3 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Psychology

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (25)

  • Ferrari AJ, Somerville AJ, Baxter AJ, Norman R, Patten SB, Vos T, Whiteford HA. Global variation in the prevalence and incidence of major depressive disorder: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Psychol Med. 2013 Mar;43(3):471-81. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712001511. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

    PMID: 22831756BACKGROUND
  • Liu Q, He H, Yang J, Feng X, Zhao F, Lyu J. Changes in the global burden of depression from 1990 to 2017: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease study. J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Jul;126:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 10.

    PMID: 31439359BACKGROUND
  • Patel V, Chisholm D, Parikh R, Charlson FJ, Degenhardt L, Dua T, Ferrari AJ, Hyman S, Laxminarayan R, Levin C, Lund C, Medina Mora ME, Petersen I, Scott J, Shidhaye R, Vijayakumar L, Thornicroft G, Whiteford H; DCP MNS Author Group. Addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1672-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00390-6. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

    PMID: 26454360BACKGROUND
  • Russ TC, Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Starr JM, Kivimaki M, Batty GD. Association between psychological distress and mortality: individual participant pooled analysis of 10 prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2012 Jul 31;345:e4933. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4933.

    PMID: 22849956BACKGROUND
  • Kazdin AE. Addressing the treatment gap: A key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jan;88:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004.

    PMID: 28110678BACKGROUND
  • Magaard JL, Seeralan T, Schulz H, Brutt AL. Factors associated with help-seeking behaviour among individuals with major depression: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0176730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176730. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28493904BACKGROUND
  • Andersson G, Titov N. Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):4-11. doi: 10.1002/wps.20083.

    PMID: 24497236BACKGROUND
  • Fairburn CG, Patel V. The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination. Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jan;88:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.012.

    PMID: 28110672BACKGROUND
  • Johansson R, Andersson G. Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012 Jul;12(7):861-9; quiz 870. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.63.

    PMID: 22853793BACKGROUND
  • Andersson G, Carlbring P, Titov N, Lindefors N. Internet Interventions for Adults with Anxiety and Mood Disorders: A Narrative Umbrella Review of Recent Meta-Analyses. Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;64(7):465-470. doi: 10.1177/0706743719839381. Epub 2019 May 16.

    PMID: 31096757BACKGROUND
  • Donker T, Blankers M, Hedman E, Ljotsson B, Petrie K, Christensen H. Economic evaluations of Internet interventions for mental health: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2015 Dec;45(16):3357-76. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001427. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

    PMID: 26235445BACKGROUND
  • Tate DF, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Gustafson A. Cost effectiveness of internet interventions: review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):40-5. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9131-6.

    PMID: 19834778BACKGROUND
  • Andersson G, Topooco N, Havik O, Nordgreen T. Internet-supported versus face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for depression. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16(1):55-60. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1125783. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

    PMID: 26610160BACKGROUND
  • Chambers R, Gullone E, Allen NB. Mindful emotion regulation: An integrative review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Aug;29(6):560-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jun 23.

    PMID: 19632752BACKGROUND
  • Lindsay EK, Creswell JD. Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT). Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;51:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

    PMID: 27835764BACKGROUND
  • Lang AJ. What mindfulness brings to psychotherapy for anxiety and depression. Depress Anxiety. 2013 May;30(5):409-12. doi: 10.1002/da.22081. Epub 2013 Feb 19. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23423991BACKGROUND
  • Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin G, Masse M, Therien P, Bouchard V, Chapleau MA, Paquin K, Hofmann SG. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Aug;33(6):763-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

    PMID: 23796855BACKGROUND
  • Boggs JM, Beck A, Felder JN, Dimidjian S, Metcalf CA, Segal ZV. Web-based intervention in mindfulness meditation for reducing residual depressive symptoms and relapse prophylaxis: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 24;16(3):e87. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3129.

    PMID: 24662625BACKGROUND
  • Spijkerman MP, Pots WT, Bohlmeijer ET. Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;45:102-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

    PMID: 27111302BACKGROUND
  • Pots WT, Meulenbeek PA, Veehof MM, Klungers J, Bohlmeijer ET. The efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as a public mental health intervention for adults with mild to moderate depressive symptomatology: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e109789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109789. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25333885BACKGROUND
  • Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Witt AA, Oh D. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;78(2):169-83. doi: 10.1037/a0018555.

    PMID: 20350028BACKGROUND
  • Barth J, Munder T, Gerger H, Nuesch E, Trelle S, Znoj H, Juni P, Cuijpers P. Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001454. Epub 2013 May 28.

    PMID: 23723742BACKGROUND
  • Wahbeh H, Svalina MN, Oken BS. Group, One-on-One, or Internet? Preferences for Mindfulness Meditation Delivery Format and their Predictors. Open Med J. 2014;1:66-74. doi: 10.2174/1874220301401010066. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

    PMID: 27057260BACKGROUND
  • Teper R, Inzlicht M. Meditation, mindfulness and executive control: the importance of emotional acceptance and brain-based performance monitoring. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Jan;8(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss045. Epub 2012 Apr 15.

    PMID: 22507824BACKGROUND
  • Gu J, Strauss C, Bond R, Cavanagh K. How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;37:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 31.

    PMID: 25689576BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionPsychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorPersonal Satisfaction

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2022

First Posted

June 8, 2022

Study Start

March 24, 2022

Primary Completion

March 30, 2024

Study Completion

March 30, 2024

Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations