NCT04795349

Brief Summary

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is well established. Increasing rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) has increased de-escalation of surgical techniques. The objective of the study is to evaluate new radiologic techniques that can accurately detect complete response in order to eliminate breast surgery. . . Currently, there are several imaging techniques for NAC response assessment (magnetic resonance imaging -MRI-, mammography and ultrasound), with good correlation in partial response, but they lack power in predicting complete pathological response. The investigators propose to use IVIM (Intravoxel incoherent motion), Kurtosis (DKI by Diffusion Kurtosis imaging) and diffusion tensor image (DTI) in MRI, contrast enhancement mammography and shear wave elastography for the evaluation of the response to systemic treatment in breast cancer patients. In order to validate the technique, in those patients with a radiological complete response by all the radiological imaging methods, a vacuum-assisted biopsy will be performed before surgery. After that, a comparison will be done between the results of the pre surgical biopsy and the definitive pathology of the specimen. So the investigators can evaluate if patients with complete radiological response after NAC, can be spared breast surgery.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 25, 2021

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2021

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

February 25, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 11, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingContrast mammographyElastography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Complete Radiological Response

    To evaluate if patients with complete radiological response after NAC, in this setting can be spared breast surgery.

    6 months after NAC initiation

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • MRI Measurements

    6 months after NAC initiation

  • Elastography

    6 months after NAC initiation

  • MRI Comparison

    6 months after NAC initiation

Study Arms (1)

NAC Patients.

EXPERIMENTAL

Breast cancer patients after NAC completion, prior to surgery

Procedure: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

Interventions

In those patients with a radiological complete response by all the radiological imaging methods, a stereotactic biopsy will be performed before surgery. After that, a comparison will be done between the results of the pre surgical biopsy and the definitive pathology of the specimen.

NAC Patients.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women with Pathologic diagnosis of breast cancer with indication of neoadjuvant chemotherapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Breast cancer recurrence
  • Other synchronic tumour.
  • Inflammatory cancer.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clínica Universidad de Navarra

Madrid, 28027, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Heil J, Kuerer HM, Pfob A, Rauch G, Sinn HP, Golatta M, Liefers GJ, Vrancken Peeters MJ. Eliminating the breast cancer surgery paradigm after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: current evidence and future challenges. Ann Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.012.

    PMID: 31912797BACKGROUND
  • Croshaw R, Shapiro-Wright H, Svensson E, Erb K, Julian T. Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3160-3. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1919-5. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

    PMID: 21947594BACKGROUND
  • Marinovich ML, Houssami N, Macaskill P, Sardanelli F, Irwig L, Mamounas EP, von Minckwitz G, Brennan ME, Ciatto S. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 6;105(5):321-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs528. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

    PMID: 23297042BACKGROUND
  • Sun K, Chen X, Chai W, Fei X, Fu C, Yan X, Zhan Y, Chen K, Shen K, Yan F. Breast Cancer: Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging-Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation with Clinical-Pathologic Factors. Radiology. 2015 Oct;277(1):46-55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141625. Epub 2015 May 4.

    PMID: 25938679BACKGROUND
  • Furman-Haran E, Nissan N, Ricart-Selma V, Martinez-Rubio C, Degani H, Camps-Herrero J. Quantitative evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by diffusion tensor imaging: Initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr;47(4):1080-1090. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25855. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

    PMID: 28901594BACKGROUND
  • Katyan A, Mittal MK, Mani C, Mandal AK. Strain wave elastography in response assessment to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Radiol. 2019 Jul;92(1099):20180515. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180515. Epub 2019 May 16.

    PMID: 31045431BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Carolina Sobrido, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2021

First Posted

March 12, 2021

Study Start

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion

December 1, 2022

Study Completion

December 1, 2022

Last Updated

March 12, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Locations