Efficacy and Safety of Etomidate Sedation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etomidate Compared to Propofol in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: a Prospective, Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Non-inferiority Study
1 other identifier
interventional
138
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During endoscopy, the patient is sedated to relieve pain and improve the ease of the procedure. Sedation endoscopy using propofol is effective, but has the disadvantage that cardiopulmonary side effects are frequently observed. However, etomidate is known to have hemodynamic and respiratory stability.The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of etomidate and propofol in sedated gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 9, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 24, 2022
CompletedNovember 12, 2024
September 1, 2024
6 months
June 2, 2022
November 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Respiratory adverse event
the number and proportion of cases of respiratory depression
during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
Secondary Outcomes (6)
ESD clinical outcomes
From enrollment to the first clinic visit (within 60 days)
Adverse events and procedure interruptions
during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
Sedation-related profile
From initial administering the sedative drug to endoscopy room discharge (up to 2 hours); dose (ml)
Satisfaction assessment
From initial administering the sedative drug to endoscopy room discharge; satisfaction score (0-10, 10 is the highest score)
Hemodynamic changes
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (up to 2 hours)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORinduction - 0.5mg/kg Propofol maintenance - 0.25mg/kg Propofol
Etomidate
EXPERIMENTALinduction - 0.25mg/kg Propofol + 0.05mg/kg Etomidate maintenance - 0.05mg/kg Etomidate
Interventions
Proofol and etomidate are drugs used for sedation and have the same white color. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection is performed using propofol in the control group and etomidate in the experimental group. Efficacy and safety of sedatives were confirmed using propofol and etomidate.
Proofol and etomidate are drugs used for sedation and have the same white color. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection is performed using propofol in the control group and etomidate in the experimental group. Efficacy and safety of sedatives were confirmed using propofol and etomidate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 19-80
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) score of I, II, III
- Scheduled endoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Previous study History of hypersensitivity to drugs or substances containing soy or egg ingredients
- Those who think that tracheal intubation will be difficult
- Obstructive sleep apnea
- History of side effects from previous sedatives
- People with severe liver disease, kidney disease, or heart disease
- Those who want a non-sleeping endoscope
- A person who refuses to provide consent
- SBP \< 80mmHg or SpO2 \< 90%
- Patients with adrenocortical dysfunction, chronic steroid users
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, Seoung-buk Gu, 02841, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2022
First Posted
June 7, 2022
Study Start
June 9, 2022
Primary Completion
November 24, 2022
Study Completion
November 24, 2022
Last Updated
November 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share