NCT05407870

Brief Summary

During endoscopy, the patient is sedated to relieve pain and improve the ease of the procedure. Sedation endoscopy using propofol is effective, but has the disadvantage that cardiopulmonary side effects are frequently observed. However, etomidate is known to have hemodynamic and respiratory stability.The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of etomidate and propofol in sedated gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
138

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 2, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 9, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 24, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 24, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 12, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

June 2, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

EtomidatePropofol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Respiratory adverse event

    the number and proportion of cases of respiratory depression

    during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • ESD clinical outcomes

    From enrollment to the first clinic visit (within 60 days)

  • Adverse events and procedure interruptions

    during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

  • Sedation-related profile

    From initial administering the sedative drug to endoscopy room discharge (up to 2 hours); dose (ml)

  • Satisfaction assessment

    From initial administering the sedative drug to endoscopy room discharge; satisfaction score (0-10, 10 is the highest score)

  • Hemodynamic changes

    From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (up to 2 hours)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Propofol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

induction - 0.5mg/kg Propofol maintenance - 0.25mg/kg Propofol

Drug: Propofol Injection

Etomidate

EXPERIMENTAL

induction - 0.25mg/kg Propofol + 0.05mg/kg Etomidate maintenance - 0.05mg/kg Etomidate

Drug: Etomidate Injection

Interventions

Proofol and etomidate are drugs used for sedation and have the same white color. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection is performed using propofol in the control group and etomidate in the experimental group. Efficacy and safety of sedatives were confirmed using propofol and etomidate.

Etomidate

Proofol and etomidate are drugs used for sedation and have the same white color. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection is performed using propofol in the control group and etomidate in the experimental group. Efficacy and safety of sedatives were confirmed using propofol and etomidate.

Propofol

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 19-80
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) score of I, II, III
  • Scheduled endoscopy

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • Previous study History of hypersensitivity to drugs or substances containing soy or egg ingredients
  • Those who think that tracheal intubation will be difficult
  • Obstructive sleep apnea
  • History of side effects from previous sedatives
  • People with severe liver disease, kidney disease, or heart disease
  • Those who want a non-sleeping endoscope
  • A person who refuses to provide consent
  • SBP \< 80mmHg or SpO2 \< 90%
  • Patients with adrenocortical dysfunction, chronic steroid users

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Korea University Anam Hospital

Seoul, Seoung-buk Gu, 02841, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

EtomidatePropofol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2022

First Posted

June 7, 2022

Study Start

June 9, 2022

Primary Completion

November 24, 2022

Study Completion

November 24, 2022

Last Updated

November 12, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations