Omalizumab Efficacy in Patients With Refractory Nasal Polyps
Omalizumab in Patients With Refractory Nasal Polyp
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and concomitant asthma, they have a poor therapeutic response and a higher recurrence rate, and treatment in these patients often fails. investigators conducted this study to survey the efficacy of Omalizumab (anti IgE) on patients with refractory nasal polyp to confirm its efficacy entering to treatment guidelines.SNOT-22 score will measure at screening; on day 1; and at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (point range, 0-110, with lower scores indicating better disease control and quality of life .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jun 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 23, 2023
CompletedJune 6, 2022
May 1, 2022
7 months
February 11, 2022
May 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
SNOT-22 (Table 2) score will measure at Questionable screening; on day 1 before treatment with omalizumab (point range, 0-110, );sino-nasal out come Test 22Quastionnaire
considering how severe the problem and how frequently it happens and determined how bad it is with choose the number; no problem :0 very mild:1 mild : 2 moderate:3 severe:4 as bad a it can be: 5 1-need to blow nose 2-sneezing 3-runny nose 4- cough 5-post nasal discharge 6-thick nasal discharge 7-ear fullness 8-dizzness 9- ear pain 10-facial pain or pressure 11-difficulty falling asleep 12-waking up at night 13-lack of a good night sleep 14-waking up tired 15-fatigue 16-reduce productivity 17-reduce concentration 18-frustrated 19-sad 20-embarrassed 21-sense of taste and smell 22-blockageor congestion of nose
day 1
SNOT-22 (Table 2) score will measure at Questionable screening; ;sino-nasal out come Test 22Quastionnaire week24 after treatment with omalizumab (point range, 0-110, )
considering how severe the problem and how frequently it happens and determined how bad it is with choose the number; no problem :0 very mild:1 mild : 2 moderate:3 severe:4 as bad a it can be: 5 1-need to blow nose 2-sneezing 3-runny nose 4- cough 5-post nasal discharge 6-thick nasal discharge 7-ear fullness 8-dizzness 9- ear pain 10-facial pain or pressure 11-difficulty falling asleep 12-waking up at night 13-lack of a good night sleep 14-waking up tired 15-fatigue 16-reduce productivity 17-reduce concentration 18-frustrated 19-sad 20-embarrassed 21-sense of taste and smell 22-blockageor congestion of nose
up to 24 weeks
assesment last score of the Test-22 Questionnaire before and after treatment with omalizumab that is related to sino-nasal and auricular function,sleep quality,psychological impact, and productivity.
patients are asked to recall their experience over a period of time and rate their symptoms on a severity scale from 0 to 5.they are also requested to identify up to 5 items that have the greatest impact on their health.
average 1 month
Study Arms (2)
use of omalizumab in patients with refractory nasal polyp
EXPERIMENTAL15 patients group with arrival criteria
control group patients with refractory nasal polyp
EXPERIMENTAL15 patient that with arrival criteria cant arrive in the patients group
Interventions
subcutaneous injection every 2 or 4 weeks, depending on the pretreatment serum total IgE level and body weight
score will measure at screening; on day 1; and at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (point range, 0-110)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients which have been investigated in Nemazee hospital immune-allergy clinic
- Patients who completed the informed consent form
- The Patients aged 18-75 years with a history of sinus surgery at least once and usage of intranasal corticosteroid for at least 4 weeks
- The patients having a total nasal polyp score (NPS) 5 or more ( NPS \>2 for each nostril)
- The patients having a nasal congestion score (NCS) of 2 or higher (with additional symptoms of postnasal drip, runny nose, and/or loss of sense of smell
- The patients having a SNOT-22 score of 20 or higher on arrival
You may not qualify if:
- The patients with other sinonasal or pulmonary disorders (except asthma), including current upper respiratory tract infection, cystic fibrosis, or other dyskinetic ciliary syndrome
- History of past or current malignancy
- History of a cardiac condition, hepatitis or liver cirrhosis
- History of recent or current infection requiring hospitalization (\<4 weeks, antibiotic (\<2 weeks) or antifungal treatment, or parasitic infection (\<6 months)
- History of recent use of systemic corticosteroid (SCS) (\<2 months), immunosuppressant, biologic, or leukotriene antagonist or modifier
- Hist.ory of recent nasal surgery (\<6 months); known allergy to omalizumab; or those who were immunocompromised
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Imam Reza Allergy and Immunology clinic, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Shiraz, Fars, 7186767431, Iran
Related Publications (1)
Gevaert P, Omachi TA, Corren J, Mullol J, Han J, Lee SE, Kaufman D, Ligueros-Saylan M, Howard M, Zhu R, Owen R, Wong K, Islam L, Bachert C. Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in nasal polyposis: 2 randomized phase 3 trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Sep;146(3):595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
PMID: 32524991RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
hossein esmailzade
SUMS
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- clinicalprofessor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2022
First Posted
June 6, 2022
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 23, 2022
Study Completion
January 23, 2023
Last Updated
June 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- CSR
- Time Frame
- data of SNOT22 is analysis
- Access Criteria
- improvement of SNOT22 score in patients versus control group
age-sex-BMI- SNOT22 questionnaire