Efficacy and Safety of Depemokimab (GSK3511294) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (ANCHOR-2)
ANCHOR-2
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 100 mg SC Depemokimab in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) - ANCHOR-2 (depemokimAb iN CHrOnic Rhinosinusitis)
2 other identifiers
interventional
264
9 countries
84
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of depemokimab (GSK3511294) in participants with Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2022
84 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 6, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 9, 2025
CompletedSeptember 9, 2025
August 1, 2025
2.2 years
March 7, 2022
July 9, 2025
August 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps (NP) Score at Week 52 (Centrally Read)
Total endoscopic nasal polyps (NP) score evaluated the size and extent of nasal polyps via endoscopy. The assessments were performed by central video image recordings of nasal endoscopy. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior meatus). The scores were graded based on NP size, recorded as sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), calculated by summing the scores \[0 to 4\] in each nostril; with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Nasal Obstruction Score Using Verbal Response Scale From Weeks 49 Through to Week 52
This endpoint evaluated the change from baseline in the mean nasal obstruction score using a Verbal Response Scale (VRS) from Week 49 through to Week 52. Participants used a VRS to rate nasal obstruction severity, with scores averaged over the specified period to assess treatment impact on nasal obstruction symptoms. Participants were asked to indicate the severity of nasal obstruction at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Score for Rhinorrhea (Runny Nose) Using Verbal Response Scale From Week 49 Through to Week 52
Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Score for Loss of Smell From Week 49 Through to Week 52
Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Lund Mackay (LMK) Computed Tomography (CT) Score at Week 52
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 Total Score at Week 52
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Nasal Obstruction Score From Week 21 Through to Week 24
Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 21 to Week 24
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Depemokimab
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a 100 milligram (mg) dose of depemokimab subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) standard of care (SOC) treatment throughout the study.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study.
Interventions
Depemokimab (GSK3511294) was administered using a pre-filled syringe.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants with 18 years of age and older inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Endoscopic bilateral NP score of at least 5 out of a maximum score of 8 (with a minimum score of 2 in each nasal cavity) assessed by the investigator.
- Participants who have had at least one of the following at Visit 1: Previous nasal surgery for the removal of NP; Have used at least three consecutive days of systemic corticosteroids in the previous 2 years for the treatment of NP; Medically unsuitable or intolerant to systemic corticosteroid.
- Participants (except for those in Japan) must be on daily treatment with intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) (including intranasal liquid steroid wash/douching) for at least 8 weeks prior to screening.
- Participants presenting with severe NP symptoms defined as symptoms of nasal congestion/blockade/obstruction with moderate or severe severity and loss of smell or rhinorrhea (runny nose) based on clinical assessment by the investigator.
- Presence of symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis as described by at least 2 different symptoms for at least 12 weeks prior to Visit 1, one of which should be either nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior/posterior nasal drip), plus facial pain/pressure and/or reduction or loss of smell.
- Male or eligible female participants
You may not qualify if:
- As a result of medical interview, physical examination, or screening investigation the physician responsible considers the participant unfit for the study.
- Cystic fibrosis.
- Antrochoanal polyps.
- Nasal cavity tumor (malignant or benign)
- Fungal rhinosinusitis
- Severe nasal septal deviation occluding one nostril preventing full assessment of nasal polyps in both nostrils.
- Participants who had a sino-nasal or sinus surgery changing the lateral wall structure of the nose making impossible the evaluation of nasal polyp score.
- Acute sinusitis or upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) at screening or in 2 weeks prior to screening.
- Ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound or chemical induced rhinitis).
- Participants who have had an asthma exacerbation requiring admission to hospital within 4 weeks of Screening.
- Participants who have undergone any intranasal and/or sinus surgery (for example polypectomy, balloon dilatation or nasal stent insertion) within 6 months prior to Visit 1; nasal biopsy prior to Visit 1 for diagnostic purposes only is excepted.
- Participants where NP surgery is contraindicated in the opinion of the Investigator.
- Participants with other conditions that could lead to elevated eosinophils such as hyper-eosinophilic syndromes including (but not limited to) eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) (formerly known as Churg-Strauss Syndrome) or Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
- Participants with a known, pre-existing parasitic infestation within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
- A known immunodeficiency (e.g. human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), other than that explained by the use of corticosteroids (CSs) taken as therapy for asthma.
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (84)
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Roseville, California, 95661, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33012, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 55446, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76109, United States
GSK Investigational Site
McAllen, Texas, 78503, United States
GSK Investigational Site
McKinney, Texas, 75070, United States
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506-9200, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Changsha, 410013, China
GSK Investigational Site
Chengdu, 610041, China
GSK Investigational Site
Guangzhou, 510000, China
GSK Investigational Site
Hangzhou, 310000, China
GSK Investigational Site
Nanjing, 210009, China
GSK Investigational Site
Shanghai, 200003, China
GSK Investigational Site
Shanghai, 200031, China
GSK Investigational Site
Suzhou, China
GSK Investigational Site
Wuhan, 430060, China
GSK Investigational Site
Xiamen, 361004, China
GSK Investigational Site
Zhongshan, 528400, China
GSK Investigational Site
Zibo Shandong Province, 255036, China
GSK Investigational Site
Bologna, 40139, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Catania, 95123, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, 20132, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Napoli, 80131, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Padua, 35100, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Pisa, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Roma, 00128, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Roma, 00168, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Rozzano MI, 20089, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Varese, 21100, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, 471-8513, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Chiba, 262-0015, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Chiba, 272-0143, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Gunma, 373-8585, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, 650-0047, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, 665-0827, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Ibaraki, 309-1793, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Nagano, 395-8505, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Shiga, 525-8585, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Shizuoka, 420-0853, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 142-8666, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
?Od?, 90-153, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80-214, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Katowice, 40-611, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Krakow, 30-033, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Krakow, 31-513, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Lubin, 59-300, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Nadarzyn, 05-830, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Poznan, 60-355, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Strzelce Opolskie, 47-100, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Brasov, 500091, Romania
GSK Investigational Site
Brasov, 500283, Romania
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 014146, Romania
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 014452, Romania
GSK Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca, 400349, Romania
GSK Investigational Site
Timișoara, 300643, Romania
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08022, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08041, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08907, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Jerez de la Frontera, 11407, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28034, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28040, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28041, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Pamplona, 31008, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Santander, 39008, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Seville, 41009, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Valladolid, 47005, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Lund, SE-221 85, Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, SE-114 86, Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, SE-171 76, Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Ankara, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)
GSK Investigational Site
CapaIstanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
GSK Investigational Site
Izmir, 35330, Turkey (Türkiye)
GSK Investigational Site
Tekirdağ, 59100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Gevaert P, Cornet M, Mullol J, De Corso E, Keles Turel N, Desrosiers M, et al. . ANCHOR-1/-2 primary data including pooled analysis ms. Lancet. PMID: 40037388 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00197-7
BACKGROUNDJackson DJ, Bourdin A, Blackorby A, Leslie A, Vichiendilokkul A, Howarth P, Karkoszka N, Fujieda S, Cornet M. Safety and Tolerability of Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Patients with Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Pooled Results from SWIFT-1/-2 and ANCHOR-1/-2. Adv Ther. 2025 Dec 29. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03457-4. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41461999DERIVEDGevaert P, Desrosiers M, Cornet M, Mullol J, De Corso E, Keles Turel N, Maspero J, Fujieda S, Zhang L, Sousa AR, Woods SJ, Davis AM, Schalkwijk S, Edwards D, Ranganathan P, Follows R, Marshall C, Han JK; ANCHOR-1 and ANCHOR-2 trial investigators. Efficacy and safety of twice per year depemokimab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (ANCHOR-1 and ANCHOR-2): phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel trials. Lancet. 2025 Mar 15;405(10482):911-926. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00197-7. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
PMID: 40037388DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- This will be a double-blind study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2022
First Posted
March 16, 2022
Study Start
April 18, 2022
Primary Completion
July 12, 2024
Study Completion
August 6, 2024
Last Updated
September 9, 2025
Results First Posted
September 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Anonymized IPD will be made available within 6 months of publication of primary, key secondary and safety results for studies in product with approved indication(s) or terminated asset(s) across all indications.
- Access Criteria
- Anonymized IPD is shared with researchers whose proposals are approved by an Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension may be granted, when justified, for up to 6 months.
Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents of the eligible studies via the Data Sharing Portal. Details on GSK's data sharing criteria can be found at: https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/innovation/trials/data-transparency/