Examination of Bromocriptine on Homeostatic and Hedonic Mechanisms of Food Intake in Individuals at High Risk for T2DM
A Multimodel Examination of Bromocriptine on Homeostatic and Hedonic Mechanisms of Food Intake in Individuals at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes
2 other identifiers
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The current project applies an integrative three-prong approach to investigate the potential of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) agonist bromocriptine to: 1) increase homeostatic satiation signaling, 2) alter neural circuitry to reduce hedonically motivated food intake, and 3) examines a genetic predisposition that may markedly impact the effectiveness of this medication in those at high risk for T2DM.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 19, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 10, 2022
CompletedSeptember 7, 2022
May 1, 2022
2 years
May 31, 2022
June 14, 2022
August 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Ad Libitum Food and Beverage Intake (g)
Ad libitum food intake of highly-palatable snacks is assessed during each intervention arm. Participants are left alone for 25 minutes to eat as much as they want from a selection of snacks (M\&Ms, Skittles, Doritos, cheddar popcorn) and a chocolate milkshake. Both snacks and milkshake are pre- and post-weighed to determine ad libitum food intake.
Within 15 minutes of completion of the ad libitum period
Hedonic Ratings of Food as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale
Testing the effects of the drug on hedonic ratings (pleasantness, desire to consume) of milkshake and snacks on a scale from -100 to 100. Pleasantness was assessed by asking 'How pleasant is this taste?', with responses ranging from -100 (most unpleasant imaginable) to 100 (most pleasant imaginable). Desire to consume was assessed by asking 'How much would you want to eat/drink this?', with responses ranging from -100 (least desirable imaginable) to 100 (most desirable imaginable).
Up to 5 minutes prior to ad libitum period start
Change in Voxel-wise Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Brain Activation in Response to Milkshake Anticipation and Receipt vs. Water
The fMRI paradigm assesses evoked BOLD response to cue-elicited anticipation and receipt of a milkshake and water. A region-of-interest (ROI) approach is used to assess changes in BOLD signal in the striatum. The striatal response is assessed for the two contrasts of interest: milkshake\>h2o anticipation and milkshake\>h2o receipt. Positive values reflect a higher striatal BOLD activation for the milkshake; negative reflects a higher striatal BOLD activation for the water. Parameter estimates of the relative BOLD response to each of these contrasts are extracted and compared between the two arms. The paradigm has 64 trials and each trial starts with the presentation of a cue for 1s signaling the impending delivery of either 3 mL of highly palatable milkshake or a control water solution over a period of 6s. Taste delivery is followed by a wait period and rinse (tasteless solution). The next trial begins after a 1-9s jitter. Order of milkshake and water trials is pseudo-randomized.
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Ad Libitum Food and Milkshake Intake (g) by TaqIA Allele Status (A1 vs. A2/A2)
Within 15 minutes of completion of the ad libitum period
Hedonic Ratings of Milkshake Pleasantness and Desire as Measured by a Visual Analog Scale by TaqIA Allele Status (A1 vs. A2/A2)
Up to 5 minutes prior to ad libitum period start
Change in Voxel-wise Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Brain Activation in Response to Milkshake Anticipation and Receipt vs. Water by TaqIA Allele Status (A1 vs. A2/A2)
Baseline and 2 Weeks
Study Arms (2)
Bromocriptine, then Placebo
OTHERDuring the first intervention visit, participants receive a single dose of 1.6mg of bromocriptine (2 0.8mg capsules). Following a 2-week washout period, participants return for the second intervention visit, where they receive 2 capsules of placebo (sugar free calcium supplement) matched in shape (circle) and color (white) to bromocriptine. Both bromocriptine and placebo are administered orally.
Placebo, then Bromocriptine
OTHERDuring the first intervention visit, participants receive 2 capsules of placebo (sugar free calcium supplement). Following a 2-week washout period, participants return for the second intervention visit, where they receive a single dose of 1.6mg of bromocriptine (2 0.8mg capsules). Both bromocriptine and placebo are administered orally.
Interventions
2 capsules, orally administered once
1.6mg (2 0.8mg capsules), orally administered once
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Baseline BMI between 25 and 35
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with current fMRI contraindications (e.g., metal implants, braces)
- Probable current Axis I psychopathology (e.g., major depression disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder)
- Habitual use of cigarettes or illicit drugs
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Diagnosis of serious medical problems (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke)
- Current weight loss dieting and/or weight fluctuations great than 10 lbs in the previous 6 weeks
- Do not consume dairy
- Allergy to bromocriptine, dairy, and nuts
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kyle Burger, PhD, RD, MPH
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kyle S Burger, MPH, RD, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2022
First Posted
June 6, 2022
Study Start
September 19, 2017
Primary Completion
September 19, 2019
Study Completion
September 19, 2019
Last Updated
September 7, 2022
Results First Posted
August 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.