NCT05403840

Brief Summary

There is uncertainty in terms of the superiority of conventional valve surgery or percutaneous transcatheter intervention for the treatment of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in high risk patients. The post procedural haemodynamics of the different treatment options in those at high surgical risk is poorly understood. This study seeks to characterise the physiological changes and functional outcomes of patients undergoing either surgery or transcatheter intervention.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Typical duration for all trials

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2022

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 3, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 6, 2022

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 6, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 6, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 3, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

May 24, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in left ventricular efficiency as measured by ventricular arterial coupling

    VA coupling is calculated by the ratio of effective arterial elastance (Ea), a measure of afterload, to LV end systolic elastance (Ees), a relatively load independent measure of LV chamber performance. Both these measures are expressed in mmHg/ml and as continuous variables. Normal determined Ea and Ees values in resting subjects are 2.2 ± 0.8 mmHg/ml and 2.3 ± 1.0 mmHg/ml, respectively. When Ea/Ees ratio is approximately equal to 1.0, LV and arterial system are optimally coupled to produce stroke work, a measure of the efficiency of LV work, corresponding to the product of systolic arterial pressure and stroke volume, and related to oxygen consumption. When Ea/Ees ratio is \<1.0, the stroke work remains close to optimal values, but when EA/EES ratio is \>1.0, the stroke work significantly falls, and the LV becomes progressively less efficient. We will compare VA coupling before and after intervention and will be analyzed as continuous variables with appropriate statistical tests.

    From baseline to immediately following intervention and 6 months follow up

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)

    Baseline to 6 months post intervention

  • Change in N-terminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP Levels)

    From baseline to immediately following intervention and 6 months follow up

  • Residual Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Severity

    Immediately following intervention and 6 months follow up

  • Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class

    Baseline to 6 months follow up

  • Change in Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD)

    Baseline to 6 months follow up

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

MVRR: Patients due to undergo surgical MV repair/replacement

Procedure: Mitral valve surgery

TMVI: Patients due to undergo transcatheter MV intervention

Procedure: Transcatheter mitral valve intervention

Interventions

Surgical mitral valve repair or replacement

MVRR: Patients due to undergo surgical MV repair/replacement

Transcatheter mitral valve repair or replacement

TMVI: Patients due to undergo transcatheter MV intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation accepted for either surgery or transcatheter valve intervention as standard of care and judged to be at high or prohibitive surgical risk.

You may qualify if:

  • Severe mitral regurgitation as per European Society of Cardiology guidelines
  • Patients undergoing MVRR or TMVI as standard of care
  • Patients at high, prohibitive surgical risk as judged by the Heart Team

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy and patients under the age of 18 years
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Moderate or severe mitral stenosis, aortic, pulmonary valve disease
  • Patients currently enrolled in any other study where involvement in this study would involve deviation from either protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Co-investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2022

First Posted

June 3, 2022

Study Start

June 6, 2022

Primary Completion

June 6, 2024

Study Completion

January 6, 2025

Last Updated

June 3, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

To be determined.