Simultaneous Implant Placement With Autogenous Bone Ring
RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is aiming to evaluate bone gain and secondary stability in autogenous bone ring technique using trephine bur compared to control group of sticky bone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2023
CompletedJune 27, 2022
June 1, 2022
11 months
May 29, 2022
June 22, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change bone gain
bone gain (increase bone volume) Measuring the crestal bone height by CT.
Immediate post-operative and 6 months post-operative CT scans will be done to evaluate the bone density, apical bone gain will be measured
Study Arms (2)
Group I: autogenous bone rings
ACTIVE COMPARATORsinus lifting was augmented by bone rings were harvested from chin
GroupII : autogenous sticky bone
ACTIVE COMPARATORsinus lifting was augmented by autogenous sticky bone was harvested from chin and immediate implant placement
Interventions
All patients involved in this study will be divided in to two group each group will receive a different technique of sinus lifting use autogenous bone ring technique with study group and autogenous sticky bone with control group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with edentulous vertically deficient posterior maxillary ridge a 4-5 mm. height of alveolar bone.
- Both males as well as females without any active periodontal disease.
- All patients are in a good health with no systemic, immunologic or debilitating diseases that could affect normal bone healing.
- All selected patients are non-smokers and non-alcoholics.
- Patients are free from T.M.J troubles, abnormal oral habits such as bruxism.
- The edentulous ridges are covered with optimal thickness of mucoperiosteum with no signs of inflammation, ulceration or scar tissue.
- Remaining natural teeth have good periodontal tissue support and occlusion showed sufficient inter arch space for future prosthesis.
You may not qualify if:
- On the local level, patients with maxillary sinus diseases, former sinus surgery and unfavorable inter maxillary relationship will be excluded.
- General contraindications to implant surgery.
- Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation.
- Untreated periodontitis.
- Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
- Uncontrolled diabetes.
- Pregnant or nursing.
- Substance abuse.
- Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
- Severe bruxism or clenching.
- Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised.
- Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
- Lack of opposite occluding dentition/prosthesis in the area intended for implant placement.
- Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.
- Need of bone augmentation procedures at implant placement.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cairo University
Cairo, Giza Governorate, 12613, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Starch-Jensen T, Deluiz D, Vitenson J, Bruun NH, Tinoco EMB. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2021 Mar 31;12(1):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2021.12101. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
PMID: 33959236RESULTOmara M, Abdelwahed N, Ahmed M, Hindy M. Simultaneous implant placement with ridge augmentation using an autogenous bone ring transplant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;45(4):535-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
PMID: 26644216RESULT
Related Links
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- This trial is considered a randomized double blind clinical trial due to the following: 1. The participant will be blinded to the technique that will be used during the surgical operation. 2. The outcome assessor will be blinded 3. The operator (DR.O.S.) will not be blinded for both techniques during the surgical operation, as the two techniques are different. (Dr. M.O.). The purpose of double blinding procedure is to reduce assessment bias and to increase accuracy and objectivity of clinical outcomes.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Simultaneous Implant Placement With Autogenous Bone Ring Transplant vs Autologous Sticky Bone Graft in Maxillary Sinus Lifting
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2022
First Posted
June 3, 2022
Study Start
September 1, 2022
Primary Completion
August 1, 2023
Study Completion
September 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share