Can Patient Expectations Influence Pain Reduction After Epidural Injections in Patients With Low Back Pain?
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigators hypothesize that patients with higher expectations regarding their epidural injection experience a higher pain reduction of their lower back pain and/or leg pain after an epidural injection. Patients' expectations of an epidural injection can influence their level of pain reduction. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the prognostic significance of patient expectations on pain reduction after epidural injections ('expected benefits', see under) in patients with low back pain and/or leg pain. Investigators furthermore hypothesize that patients that have a higher match between their expectations of improvement and actual improvement are more satisfied. A secondary objective of this study is to investigate the prognostic significance of a high match between expectations of improvement and actual improvement on patient satisfaction of the treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2022
CompletedOctober 3, 2022
September 1, 2022
5 months
May 30, 2022
September 30, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction of the average pain severity
The reduction of the average pain severity score of the Brief Pain Inventory Short form \[Time Frame: 10 days after injection in comparison to baseline\]. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short form will be used to assess pain intensity after lumbar epidural injection. BPI assess for pain and its scale is measured between 0 - 10, where '0' indicates no pain and '10' indicates severe pain in the last 24 hours. A decrease in the BPI score of 2 or more from the baseline score is considered clinically significant and indicates an improvement in severity of the patient's pain.15 We will examine the prognostic significance of patient expectations ('expected benefits', see under) on pain reduction after epidural injections in patients with low back pain and/or leg pain.
10 days after injection
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Brief Pain Inventory Short form: average pain interference score
10 days after injection
The reduction of the immediate pain severity score of the Brief Pain Inventory Short form
1 hour after injection
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
10 days after injection
Patients' satisfaction
10 days after injection
Study Arms (2)
New patient with lower back pain
known patient with lower back pain
Interventions
patient receives an epidural injection due to lower back pain
patient receives a periradicular injection due to lower back pain
Eligibility Criteria
Patients of our pain management center that get a transforaminal, translaminar or caudal injection of the spine.
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years old.
- Patients treated with a fluoroscopic guided lumbar epidural injection (transforaminal/translaminar/caudal) for back and/or leg pain
You may not qualify if:
- patients who did not complete the questionnaires
- patient did not sign the general consent form (EOC\_M-AFRI-001/A)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Lugano, 6900, Switzerland
Related Publications (15)
Urits I, Burshtein A, Sharma M, Testa L, Gold PA, Orhurhu V, Viswanath O, Jones MR, Sidransky MA, Spektor B, Kaye AD. Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 11;23(3):23. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0757-1.
PMID: 30854609RESULTGBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
PMID: 30496104RESULTHurwitz EL, Randhawa K, Yu H, Cote P, Haldeman S. The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(Suppl 6):796-801. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5432-9. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
PMID: 29480409RESULTLast AR, Hulbert K. Chronic low back pain: evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Jun 15;79(12):1067-74.
PMID: 19530637RESULTAndersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999 Aug 14;354(9178):581-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4.
PMID: 10470716RESULTChou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, Fu R, Dana T, Kraegel P, Griffin J, Grusing S, Brodt ED. Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):493-505. doi: 10.7326/M16-2459. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PMID: 28192793RESULTWieser S, Horisberger B, Schmidhauser S, Eisenring C, Brugger U, Ruckstuhl A, Dietrich J, Mannion AF, Elfering A, Tamcan O, Muller U. Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005. Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Oct;12(5):455-67. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0258-y. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
PMID: 20526649RESULTBredow J, Bloess K, Oppermann J, Boese CK, Lohrer L, Eysel P. [Conservative treatment of nonspecific, chronic low back pain : Evidence of the efficacy - a systematic literature review]. Orthopade. 2016 Jul;45(7):573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3248-7. German.
PMID: 27075679RESULTAbdi S, Datta S, Trescot AM, Schultz DM, Adlaka R, Atluri SL, Smith HS, Manchikanti L. Epidural steroids in the management of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review. Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):185-212.
PMID: 17256030RESULTFalco FJ, Irwin L, Zhu J. Lumbar spine injection and interventional procedures in the management of low back pain. Clin Occup Environ Med. 2006;5(3):655-702, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.coem.2006.04.001.
PMID: 16963381RESULTBrunner M, Schwarz T, Zeman F, Konig M, Grifka J, Benditz A. Efficiency and predictive parameters of outcome of a multimodal pain management concept with spinal injections in patients with low back pain: a retrospective study of 445 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jul;138(7):901-909. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2916-y. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
PMID: 29511801RESULTAuer CJ, Glombiewski JA, Doering BK, Winkler A, Laferton JA, Broadbent E, Rief W. Patients' Expectations Predict Surgery Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;23(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9500-4.
PMID: 26223485RESULTNg Kuet Leong VS, Kastner A, Petzke F, Przemeck M, Erlenwein J. The influence of pain expectation on pain experience after orthopedic surgery: an observational cohort study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Oct;86(10):1019-1030. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14084-7. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
PMID: 32613811RESULTLaferton JAC, Oeltjen L, Neubauer K, Ebert DD, Munder T. The effects of patients' expectations on surgery outcome in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prognostic factor meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2022 Mar;16(1):50-66. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1854051. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
PMID: 33228474RESULTTan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004 Mar;5(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005.
PMID: 15042521RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eva Koetsier, PhD
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Valeria Scheiwiller
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2022
First Posted
June 2, 2022
Study Start
April 20, 2022
Primary Completion
September 30, 2022
Study Completion
September 30, 2022
Last Updated
October 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share