NCT05402631

Brief Summary

Investigators hypothesize that patients with higher expectations regarding their epidural injection experience a higher pain reduction of their lower back pain and/or leg pain after an epidural injection. Patients' expectations of an epidural injection can influence their level of pain reduction. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the prognostic significance of patient expectations on pain reduction after epidural injections ('expected benefits', see under) in patients with low back pain and/or leg pain. Investigators furthermore hypothesize that patients that have a higher match between their expectations of improvement and actual improvement are more satisfied. A secondary objective of this study is to investigate the prognostic significance of a high match between expectations of improvement and actual improvement on patient satisfaction of the treatment.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 20, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 30, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 2, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 3, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

May 30, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

ExpectationsInfluence of Expectations on OutcomeBack PainEpidural InjectionsPeriradicular Injections

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Reduction of the average pain severity

    The reduction of the average pain severity score of the Brief Pain Inventory Short form \[Time Frame: 10 days after injection in comparison to baseline\]. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short form will be used to assess pain intensity after lumbar epidural injection. BPI assess for pain and its scale is measured between 0 - 10, where '0' indicates no pain and '10' indicates severe pain in the last 24 hours. A decrease in the BPI score of 2 or more from the baseline score is considered clinically significant and indicates an improvement in severity of the patient's pain.15 We will examine the prognostic significance of patient expectations ('expected benefits', see under) on pain reduction after epidural injections in patients with low back pain and/or leg pain.

    10 days after injection

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Brief Pain Inventory Short form: average pain interference score

    10 days after injection

  • The reduction of the immediate pain severity score of the Brief Pain Inventory Short form

    1 hour after injection

  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    10 days after injection

  • Patients' satisfaction

    10 days after injection

Study Arms (2)

New patient with lower back pain

Procedure: Epidural InjectionProcedure: Periradicular Injection

known patient with lower back pain

Procedure: Epidural InjectionProcedure: Periradicular Injection

Interventions

patient receives an epidural injection due to lower back pain

New patient with lower back painknown patient with lower back pain

patient receives a periradicular injection due to lower back pain

New patient with lower back painknown patient with lower back pain

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients of our pain management center that get a transforaminal, translaminar or caudal injection of the spine.

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18 years old.
  • Patients treated with a fluoroscopic guided lumbar epidural injection (transforaminal/translaminar/caudal) for back and/or leg pain

You may not qualify if:

  • patients who did not complete the questionnaires
  • patient did not sign the general consent form (EOC\_M-AFRI-001/A)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

Lugano, 6900, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (15)

  • Urits I, Burshtein A, Sharma M, Testa L, Gold PA, Orhurhu V, Viswanath O, Jones MR, Sidransky MA, Spektor B, Kaye AD. Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 11;23(3):23. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0757-1.

  • GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

  • Hurwitz EL, Randhawa K, Yu H, Cote P, Haldeman S. The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(Suppl 6):796-801. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5432-9. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

  • Last AR, Hulbert K. Chronic low back pain: evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Jun 15;79(12):1067-74.

  • Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999 Aug 14;354(9178):581-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4.

  • Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, Fu R, Dana T, Kraegel P, Griffin J, Grusing S, Brodt ED. Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):493-505. doi: 10.7326/M16-2459. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

  • Wieser S, Horisberger B, Schmidhauser S, Eisenring C, Brugger U, Ruckstuhl A, Dietrich J, Mannion AF, Elfering A, Tamcan O, Muller U. Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005. Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Oct;12(5):455-67. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0258-y. Epub 2010 Jun 5.

  • Bredow J, Bloess K, Oppermann J, Boese CK, Lohrer L, Eysel P. [Conservative treatment of nonspecific, chronic low back pain : Evidence of the efficacy - a systematic literature review]. Orthopade. 2016 Jul;45(7):573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3248-7. German.

  • Abdi S, Datta S, Trescot AM, Schultz DM, Adlaka R, Atluri SL, Smith HS, Manchikanti L. Epidural steroids in the management of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review. Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):185-212.

  • Falco FJ, Irwin L, Zhu J. Lumbar spine injection and interventional procedures in the management of low back pain. Clin Occup Environ Med. 2006;5(3):655-702, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.coem.2006.04.001.

  • Brunner M, Schwarz T, Zeman F, Konig M, Grifka J, Benditz A. Efficiency and predictive parameters of outcome of a multimodal pain management concept with spinal injections in patients with low back pain: a retrospective study of 445 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jul;138(7):901-909. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2916-y. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

  • Auer CJ, Glombiewski JA, Doering BK, Winkler A, Laferton JA, Broadbent E, Rief W. Patients' Expectations Predict Surgery Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;23(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9500-4.

  • Ng Kuet Leong VS, Kastner A, Petzke F, Przemeck M, Erlenwein J. The influence of pain expectation on pain experience after orthopedic surgery: an observational cohort study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Oct;86(10):1019-1030. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14084-7. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

  • Laferton JAC, Oeltjen L, Neubauer K, Ebert DD, Munder T. The effects of patients' expectations on surgery outcome in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prognostic factor meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2022 Mar;16(1):50-66. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1854051. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

  • Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004 Mar;5(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Back PainPatient Satisfaction

Interventions

Injections, Epidural

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Injections, SpinalInjectionsDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Eva Koetsier, PhD

    Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Valeria Scheiwiller

    Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2022

First Posted

June 2, 2022

Study Start

April 20, 2022

Primary Completion

September 30, 2022

Study Completion

September 30, 2022

Last Updated

October 3, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations