VOICE Study in China 'Towards a Partnership Between Parents of Very Premature Infants and Healthcare Professionals'
VOICE
VOICE: Values, Opportunities, Integration, Control and Evaluation: Towards a Partnership Between Parents of Very Premature Infants and Healthcare Professionals in China
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Admission to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is associated with significant levels of parental stress and anxiety. Parents are often uncertain to perform care giving activities and might feel uncertain to fulfill the desirable parental role during NICU admission. Furthermore, transition of the NICU to another unit or hospital is stressful for parents often related to poor information and communication. A VOICE program is developed aiming to increase the empowerment of parents, to improve partnership between parents of very premature infants and healthcare professionals. Aim: To conduct a feasibility RCT study to evaluate the implementation and the effect of the VOICE program on parental stress and anxiety in the NICU. Methods: Design is a feasibility RCT to test the procedures, compliance, determine sample size, estimating recruitment and retention, and to get first insight in the effects of the VOICE program on the outcome measures. VOICE will be implemented as a structured empowerment and partnership program for parents from admission of the infant to the NICU till the first visit to the out-patient clinic. The program exists of five structured and focused meetings, following the acronym VOICE (Values, Opportunities, Integration, Control and Evaluation). These interdisciplinary meetings with parents aim to increase the involvement of parents in the care and decision making of participants' infant in the NICU. The primary outcome measures will be parental stress and anxiety measured by the Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (Chinese version). The secondary outcome measures will be parent satisfaction with care measured by the Empowerment of Parents in the Intensive Care (EMPATHIC-30) scale, length-of-stay in the NICU, hours of parental visitation and activities, compliance of NICU staff to the VOICE program. An embedded qualitative study will be designed to explore the experiences of parents and NICU staff about the implemented VOICE program. Individual interviews with parents and focus groups sessions with NICU staff will be conduction. This will help to identify methodological issues such as recruitment and retention and any enablers and barriers to the intervention which may impede the future RCT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2023
CompletedMay 23, 2022
May 1, 2022
6 months
April 30, 2022
May 19, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of Hospital Anxiety and Depression before and after intervention
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale is a 14-item scale measuring hospital anxiety and depression. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each subscale has a score ranging from 0 to 21. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0-3, generating a scale range of 0-42 points, with higher scores representing greater symptom severity. Score of 0-7 indicates normal levels of anxiety and depression; 8-10 indicate borderline abnormal anxiety and depression levels, and 11-21 suggest abnormal levels of anxiety and depression.
Time Frame of measurement : T1 = Baseline pre-intervention (first week of admission) , T2 = After intervention (4 weeks after discharge)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Postnatal Depression
Measure time point: After invervention(4 weeks after discharge)
Parent satisfaction
Measure time point: After invervention(4 weeks after discharge)
Length-of-stay in the NICU
Measure time point: After invervention(4 weeks after discharge)
Hours of parental daily visitation and their activities
Daily during intervention
Weight gain during hospitalization
T1 = at admission ,T2 = at discharge
Study Arms (2)
VOICE care
EXPERIMENTALThe VOICE conversations contain minimal 5 consecutive conversations with parents. The conversations are not rigid or strictly protocolized but rather focus on issues related to the situation of the admission period of the infant and the conversations should be individualized based on the parent needs. Thus, depending on the situation of the infant and the home situation of the parents. The content of the VOICE conversations is built up based on the admission pathway of the infant. Every VOICE conversation has its own focus, and these are presented in the 5 VOICE conversation guides. Basically, every VOICE conversation is about the support of parents and infant. The principles of the VOICE conversations are Values, Opportunities, Integration, Control and Evaluation. The VOICE program focuses on a systematic and planned communications with parents during the NICU admission and follow-up 2-4 weeks after NICU discharge.
Standard care
NO INTERVENTIONStandard care is defined as the standard family centered care (FCC) practices currently implemented in the NICU. Parents are allowed to visit the NICU for 3 hours every day and provide basic care to their infant. Standard care involves meetings with the doctors three times a week and the content is mainly directed to the medical condition and treatments of the infant. No other meetings between parents and doctors/nurses exists. The FCC principles implicate that parents and NICU staff work closely together on the NICU. This also involves unscheduled information and communication contact moments where short questions of parents will be addressed.
Interventions
I phase:build a relationship with parents and where the Values of the parents and NICU staff is shared. II phase: discuss with the parents the Opportunities the parents can have to be more involved in the care of their baby. III phase: Integration of the involvement of the parents in the care of their baby. The experiences of parents need to be shared with the NICU staff. Any raising issue about the involvement of care by the parents can be discussed and see if improvement is needed. IV phase:Control of the knowledge about the care of their baby before going home and if the parents have any issues which need to be arranged before discharge. V phase:Evaluation. During this conversation the overall experiences of the parents will be discussed and if there are any further questions related to the care of their baby at home will be explored and discussed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents of infants born \< 32 weeks GA
- Parents of infants admitted to NICU within 7days after birth
- Parents speaking and writing Chinese.
You may not qualify if:
- Parent of infants with an expected NICU length-of-stay less than 4 weeks
- Parents of infants having a major life-threatening congenital anomaly
- Parents of infants with a critical illness and unlikely to survive
- Parents with an inability to participate (health, family, social, or language issues that might inhibit their ability to collaborate with the NICU staff
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (21)
Alkozei A, McMahon E, Lahav A. Stress levels and depressive symptoms in NICU mothers in the early postpartum period. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov;27(17):1738-43. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.942626. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
PMID: 25005861BACKGROUNDAyers S, Joseph S, McKenzie-McHarg K, Slade P, Wijma K. Post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth: current issues and recommendations for future research. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Dec;29(4):240-50. doi: 10.1080/01674820802034631.
PMID: 18608815BACKGROUNDCox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.
PMID: 3651732BACKGROUNDCraig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
PMID: 18824488BACKGROUNDDavis L, Edwards H, Mohay H, Wollin J. The impact of very premature birth on the psychological health of mothers. Early Hum Dev. 2003 Aug;73(1-2):61-70. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(03)00073-2.
PMID: 12932894BACKGROUNDEngelhard IM, van den Hout MA, Schouten EG. Neuroticism and low educational level predict the risk of posttraumatic stress disorder in women after miscarriage or stillbirth. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006 Sep-Oct;28(5):414-7. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.07.001.
PMID: 16950377BACKGROUNDEngelhard IM, van Rij M, Boullart I, Ekhart TH, Spaanderman ME, van den Hout MA, Peeters LL. Posttraumatic stress disorder after pre-eclampsia: an exploratory study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002 Jul-Aug;24(4):260-4. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(02)00189-5.
PMID: 12100837BACKGROUNDGonya J, Martin E, McClead R, Nelin L, Shepherd E. Empowerment programme for parents of extremely premature infants significantly reduced length of stay and readmission rates. Acta Paediatr. 2014 Jul;103(7):727-31. doi: 10.1111/apa.12669.
PMID: 24766486BACKGROUNDGreene MM, Rossman B, Patra K, Kratovil A, Khan S, Meier PP. Maternal psychological distress and visitation to the neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr. 2015 Jul;104(7):e306-13. doi: 10.1111/apa.12975. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
PMID: 25684177BACKGROUNDHelder OK, Verweij JC, van Staa A. Transition from neonatal intensive care unit to special care nurseries: experiences of parents and nurses. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 May;13(3):305-11. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182257a39.
PMID: 21705956BACKGROUNDJiang S, Warre R, Qiu X, O'Brien K, Lee SK. Parents as practitioners in preterm care. Early Hum Dev. 2014 Nov;90(11):781-5. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
PMID: 25246323BACKGROUNDKoren, P. E., DeChillo, N., & Friesen, B. J. (1992). Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: A brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37(4), 305-321.
BACKGROUNDLatour JM, Duivenvoorden HJ, Hazelzet JA, van Goudoever JB. Development and validation of a neonatal intensive care parent satisfaction instrument. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;13(5):554-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318238b80a.
PMID: 22460771BACKGROUNDLatour JM, Hazelzet JA, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Goudoever JB. Perceptions of parents, nurses, and physicians on neonatal intensive care practices. J Pediatr. 2010 Aug;157(2):215-220.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
PMID: 20359714BACKGROUNDMelnyk BM, Feinstein NF. Reducing hospital expenditures with the COPE (Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment) program for parents and premature infants: an analysis of direct healthcare neonatal intensive care unit costs and savings. Nurs Adm Q. 2009 Jan-Mar;33(1):32-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000343346.47795.13.
PMID: 19092521BACKGROUNDO'Brien K, Bracht M, Robson K, Ye XY, Mirea L, Cruz M, Ng E, Monterrosa L, Soraisham A, Alvaro R, Narvey M, Da Silva O, Lui K, Tarnow-Mordi W, Lee SK. Evaluation of the Family Integrated Care model of neonatal intensive care: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Canada and Australia. BMC Pediatr. 2015 Dec 15;15:210. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0527-0.
PMID: 26671340BACKGROUNDSchappin R, Wijnroks L, Uniken Venema MM, Jongmans MJ. Rethinking stress in parents of preterm infants: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054992. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
PMID: 23405105BACKGROUNDStowe ZN, Nemeroff CB. Women at risk for postpartum-onset major depression. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Aug;173(2):639-45. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90296-1.
PMID: 7645646BACKGROUNDWeis J, Zoffmann V, Egerod I. Improved nurse-parent communication in neonatal intensive care unit: evaluation and adjustment of an implementation strategy. J Clin Nurs. 2014 Dec;23(23-24):3478-89. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12599. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
PMID: 24698260BACKGROUNDWhite T , Matthey S , Boyd K , et al. Postnatal depression and post-traumatic stress after childbirth: Prevalence, course and co-occurrence[J]. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology, 2006, 24(2):107-120.
BACKGROUNDEldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27965879BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiao-ming Peng
Hunan Children's Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2022
First Posted
May 23, 2022
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
November 30, 2022
Study Completion
January 31, 2023
Last Updated
May 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is not a plan to make IPD available.