NCT05380544

Brief Summary

Summary of the problem: Diabetes has been described as the fastest growing health crisis of our time. It currently affects more than 4.5million people in the UK. The direct cost to the NHS is already over £1 billion per year. One of the commonest complications of diabetes are foot ulcers. Despite current best treatment, these ulcers can be very difficult to heal, often taking months to heal and some never do. Even after healing ulcers return in up to 60% of people. In England someone undergoes an amputation of part of their foot every 2 hours and every 4 hours someone loses their leg due to diabetic foot ulcers. People are rarely able to be as active as before. This seriously affects their work, finances and quality of life. Research into improved treatments are a national priority. These treatments need to be safe, effective, tolerable for patients and value for money. Preliminary research has identified shockwave therapy as a promising new treatment in which high-power soundwaves (similar to ultrasound) are delivered to the ulcer. This may make ulcers heal faster. However, the effectiveness of shockwave therapy and the optimum dose is unknown. The aim of the study:

  1. 1.To carry out a preliminary (pilot) trial comparing sham (not active) shockwaves, low number of shockwaves and high number of shockwaves on diabetic foot ulcer healing
  2. 2.To understand beliefs, concerns, ideas and experience of shockwave therapy amongst patients and clinicians
  3. 3.To investigate the cost effectiveness (value for money) of shockwave therapy
  4. 4.High dose shockwave treatment
  5. 5.Low dose shockwave treatment
  6. 6."Sham" shockwave treatment

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
77

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
72mo left

Started Apr 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress40%
Apr 2022May 2032

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 13, 2022

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2022

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 19, 2022

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2023

Completed
8.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2032

Expected
Last Updated

October 2, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

April 22, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 1, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Eligibility ratio and recruitment ratio

    Number eligible patients/number patients screened / recruited

    19 months

  • Adherence to treatment

    Number participants who completed the treatment protocol/number participants in the trial.

    19 months

  • Percentage of missing data at each follow up point

    Number of missing data points over number of data points x100

    24 weeks

  • Follow up rates

    No. of participants who attended each follow-up appointments / no. of follow-up appointments .

    6 weeks

  • Follow up rates

    No. of participants who attended each follow-up appointments / no. of follow-up

    12 weeks

  • Follow up rates

    No. of participants who attended each follow-up appointments / no. of follow-up

    24 weeks

  • Patient and clinician acceptability of the trial process and ESWT

    Semi-structured in depth interviews

    24 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Time to DFU healing

    24 weeks

  • Proportion of DFUs healed at 6 months

    24 weeks

  • Reduction in ulcer size at each study visit

    24 weeks

  • Quality of life questionnaires

    24 weeks

  • Quality of life questionnaires

    24 weeks

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Sham shockwave therapy

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham shockwave therapy in standard ulcer care.

Device: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Low dose shockwave therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

100 shocks per cm2 plus standard ulcer care

Device: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

High dose shockwave therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

500 shocks per cm2 plus standard ulcer care

Device: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Interventions

ESWT will be given at 0.1mJ/mm2, 5 pulses/second and penetration of 5mm. Each intervention will be delivered in 3x30minute sessions over 7 days.

High dose shockwave therapyLow dose shockwave therapySham shockwave therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 120 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At least one unhealed diabetic foot ulcer below the level of the medial malleoli that has been present for more than 4 weeks
  • Absolute toe pressure greater than or equal to 50mmHg or an Ankle Pressure Brachial Index (ABPI) equal to or greater than 0.7(24, 25)
  • Capacity to consent to participate in the trial and given written informed consent
  • Willing to be randomised to either sham, low-dose or high-dose ESWT
  • Willing to consent to photography of the index DFU
  • Willing to comply with the follow up schedule

You may not qualify if:

  • Interdigital index ulcer. This is because the ESWT delivery paddle does not fit between digits.
  • Currently on or planned treatment for osteomyelitis.
  • Currently taking any therapeutic anticoagulation medications. This includes novel oral anticoagulants, therapeutic doses of heparin and vitamin-K antagonists. This is a contraindication to ESWT.
  • Diagnosis of malignancy in the treatment area or haematological, disseminated or lymphatic malignancy. This is a contraindication to ESWT.
  • All who are pregnant, trying to conceive or breastfeeding. This is a contraindication to ESWT.
  • Active participants in other trials that may conflict with the study outcomes, for example any other wound care trials.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Hull, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hitchman L, Iglesias C, Russell D, Smith G, Twiddy M, Chetter IC. A Pilot Three Arm Randomised Controlled Trial and Qualitative Study of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing (SOLEFUL): A Study Protocol. Int Wound J. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70176. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70176.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot

Interventions

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetic AngiopathiesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesFoot UlcerLeg UlcerSkin UlcerSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System DiseasesDiabetic Neuropathies

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic TherapyDiathermyHyperthermia, InducedTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Louise Hitchman, MBBSMRCSMSc

    Hull York Medical School

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Use of sham therapy for participant. Blinded outcome assessors.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Pilot RCT and Qualitative study
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2022

First Posted

May 19, 2022

Study Start

April 13, 2022

Primary Completion

October 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2032

Last Updated

October 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data on request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
Data shared dependent on request, following study completion.
Access Criteria
Formal written letter to the PI.

Locations