Evaluation of BiCROS Fitting Benefits
Evaluate the Benefit of a BiCROS Hearing Aid Fitting
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
2
Brief Summary
22 candidates for BiCROS hearing aids will be recruited and fitted with a hearing aid and a CROS device. Following a real-world trial, each participant will be tested on a range of outcome measures including speech recognition in noise, ratings of listening effort, and ratings of preference.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 11, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 21, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 11, 2025
CompletedJune 11, 2025
March 1, 2023
8 months
April 8, 2022
April 24, 2024
June 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Speech Intelligibility in Noise Measured With US Matrix Test (Noise From a Defined Loudspeaker)
Measuring the Signal to Noise Ratio change in decibels (dB) for speech from the front loudspeaker and noise from the better ear's side with the US matrix Test. Results of the speech test will be the SRT (speech recognition threshold) in dB SNR (signal to noise ratio). The target speaker will be presented from 0° azimuth and is adaptive (start level at 65dB (A)). The noise will be presented on the better ear at an azimuth of 90° or 270° (depending on the site of the better ear), at a level of 65 dB (A).
At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Speech Intelligibility in Noise Measured With US Matrix Test (Diffuse Noise)
At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Reports of Subjective Quality of Hearing as Assessed by the SSQ
At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Reports of Subjective Quality of Hearing as Assessed by the Bern Benefit Questionnaires
At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Sound Quality Ratings for Total Impression and Clarity Using Gabriellson et al (1990) Ratings Scales
At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Subjective Preference of Hearing Aid Condition
At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
BiCROS fitting with beamformer
EXPERIMENTALEach participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the unaidable ear and with a compatible hearing aid on the other ear. A beamformer (directional microphone) will be enabled during this measurement. Although each ear receives a different device configuration depending on the condition, the participant is assigned as a whole, and assignment is not by ears.
BiCROS fitting omni
EXPERIMENTALEach participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the unaidable ear and with a compatible hearing aid on the other ear. The microphones will be omnidirectional. Although each ear receives a different device configuration depending on the condition, the participant is assigned as a whole, and assignment is not by ears.
Monaural hearing aid fitting with beamformer
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach participant will be fitted with a hearing aid on the better hearing ear and no device on the unaidable ear. A beamformer (directional microphone) will be enabled during the measurement. Although each ear receives a different device configuration depending on the condition, the participant is assigned as a whole, and assignment is not by ears.
Monaural hearing aid fitting omni
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach participant will be fitted with a hearing aid on the better hearing ear and no device on the unaidable ear. The microphone will be omnidirectional. Although each ear receives a different device configuration depending on the condition, the participant is assigned as a whole, and assignment is not by ears.
Unaided condition
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention, the participants are not fitted with a CROS device and/or hearing aid.
Interventions
A participant will wear a hearing aid with and without a CROS device on the unaidable ear.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- unaidable hearing loss in worse ear (\>N6)
- aidable hearing loss (N3 to N5) on the other ear
- fluent English speaker
You may not qualify if:
- \- aidable hearing loss in both ears
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sonova AGlead
- Western University, Canadacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
National Centre for Audiology
London, Ontario, N6G 1H1, Canada
Sonova Innovation Centre Toronto
Mississauga, Ontario, L5L1J3, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Susan Scollie
- Organization
- National Centre for Audiology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan Scollie
Western University, Canada
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Participants were wearing the BiCROS fitting during home trial, where no masking was possible. For in-lab tests, the CROS device was deactivated for the monaural condition, allowing for some masking. The unaided condition could not be masked. Participants were not aware which beamformer configuration was active during in-lab tests.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2022
First Posted
May 18, 2022
Study Start
July 11, 2022
Primary Completion
March 21, 2023
Study Completion
March 21, 2023
Last Updated
June 11, 2025
Results First Posted
June 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share