NCT05376735

Brief Summary

The primary aim of the proposed Randomised Control study is to investigate the effects of a socially assisted robot (i.e. Purrble) and a bespoke Single Session Intervention (SSI) on students' anxiety (measured by GAD7) over the period of the academic term (in comparison to a wait-listed student group). Secondary aims include investigating the effects of the Purrble and SSI on students' depression, emotion regulation processes, and quantitative and qualitative (interviews) measures of engagement with the intervention.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable anxiety

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable anxiety

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 3, 2022

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 16, 2022

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 17, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 19, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 27, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

May 3, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

emotion regulationin-situ interventionuniversity students

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Anxiety (measured by GAD7) -- pre/mid/post

    The primary aim is to investigate the effects of Purrble + SSI intervention on students' changes in anxiety over the period of academic term (in comparison to a wait-listed student group). Overall changes in anxiety throughout the deployment will be measured by the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7), a seven-item instrument that is used to measure or assess the severity of generalised anxiety disorder. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of their symptoms over the past two weeks (Splitzer et al 2006). The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day," respectively, and then adding together the scores for the seven questions. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent cut-points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater.

    Three times during the 4-week long deployment period: pre, mid and post deployment

  • Anxiety (measured by GAD2) -- weekly

    The primary aim is to investigate the effects of Purrble + SSI intervention on students' changes in anxiety over the period of academic term (in comparison to a wait-listed student group). Weekly changes in anxiety will be measured with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2): a very brief and easy to perform initial screening tool for generalized anxiety disorder. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of their symptoms over the past two weeks (Kroenke et al 2007). A score of 3 points is the preferred cut-off for identifying possible cases and in which further diagnostic evaluation for generalized anxiety disorder is warranted. Using a cut-off of 3 the GAD-2 has a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 83% for diagnosis generalized anxiety disorder.

    Once a week for the 4-week long deployment period

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Depression -- pre/mid/post

    Three times during the 4-week long deployment period: pre, mid and post deployment

  • Depression -- weekly

    Once a week for the 4-week long deployment period

  • Emotion regulation (beliefs ) -- pre/mid/post

    Three times during the 4-week long deployment period: pre, mid and post deployment

  • Emotion regulation (self-efficacy) -- pre/mid/post

    Three times during the 4-week long deployment period: pre, mid and post deployment

  • Engagement with the Purrble intervention - open ended

    Once a week for the 4-week long deployment period

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Purrble intervention + Single Session Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The Purrble intervention takes the form of an interactive plush toy, designed to be handed over to the child and support in-the-moment soothing. When the Purrble is picked up, it emits a frantic heartbeat that slows down if the person uses calm stroking movements. If the Purrble is soothed for long enough, it transitions into a purring vibration indicating a calm, content state. The Single Session Intervention has been co-produced with university students and clinical experts (Prof Jessica Schleider), combining the theories of emotion regulation with the qualitative experiences of students in open trial. The result follows a traditional SSI structure (cf., Schleider et al 2020), including 1. Initial guided reflection exercise 2. Short interactive psychoeducation 3. Personalised action plan The SSI will be accessible by students on a website and be both desktop and mobile browser friendly. The full process should not take students longer than 30 minutes.

Behavioral: Purrble interventionBehavioral: Single Session Intervention

Treatment as usual / Waiting list

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in the control group will be given a Purrble \& access to the online SSI intervention before the academic term ends, after 4 week follow-up questionnaires are completed.

Interventions

The intervention takes the form of an interactive plush toy, designed to be handed over to the child and support in-the-moment soothing. The Purrble is introduced to the student as an anxious creature that may need kind attention from humans. When picked up, the Purrble emits a frantic heartbeat that slows down if the child uses calm stroking movements. If it's soothed for long enough, it transitions into a purring vibration indicating a calm, content state. Logic model underlying the intervention: Level 1: in-the-moment soothing support to students in emotional moments when they would attempt to practice emotion regulation (ER) strategies to calm down. Level 2: mechanisms that facilitate long-term engagement with the intervention, building on positive subjective experience of Level 1. Level 3: shift in students' ER practices and implicit beliefs about emotion, after repeated experience of Levels 1-2.

Purrble intervention + Single Session Intervention

The SSI has been co-produced with university students and clinical experts, combining the theories of ER with the qualitative experiences of students in open trial. The result follows a traditional SSI structure (cf., Schleider et al 2020), including * Initial guided reflection exercise (helping understand one's experience with Purrble in the 1st week). * Short interactive psychoeducation, introducing the concept of window of tolerance, the Process Model of Emotions (Gross2015), and specific ways in which Purrble can help students down-regulate emotions within the context of the process model. * Action plan to identify: moments when Purrble could be useful, what ER strategies they would like to use in those moments, what obstacles they may encounter, and how to overcome them. The SSI will be accessible by students on a website and be both desktop and mobile browser friendly. The full process should not take students longer than 30 minutes.

Also known as: SSI
Purrble intervention + Single Session Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Currently registered as a student at Oxford University (under- or postgraduate) at the time of the study
  • Currently living in the UK at the time of the study
  • Aged 18-25
  • GAD7 score \>= 10 (Löwe, 2008)
  • Consistent internet and computer/laptop/smartphone access
  • Able to read and write in English

You may not qualify if:

  • Not an Oxford University student currently living in the UK at the time of the study
  • Not within age range
  • GAD7 score \< 10 (Löwe, 2008)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Auerbach RP, Mortier P, Bruffaerts R, Alonso J, Benjet C, Cuijpers P, Demyttenaere K, Ebert DD, Green JG, Hasking P, Murray E, Nock MK, Pinder-Amaker S, Sampson NA, Stein DJ, Vilagut G, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC; WHO WMH-ICS Collaborators. WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: Prevalence and distribution of mental disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Oct;127(7):623-638. doi: 10.1037/abn0000362. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

    PMID: 30211576BACKGROUND
  • Torous J, Nicholas J, Larsen ME, Firth J, Christensen H. Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):116-119. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102891. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

    PMID: 29871870BACKGROUND
  • Brown JSL. Student mental health: some answers and more questions. J Ment Health. 2018 Jun;27(3):193-196. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1470319. Epub 2018 May 16. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29768071BACKGROUND
  • Musiat P, Goldstone P, Tarrier N. Understanding the acceptability of e-mental health--attitudes and expectations towards computerised self-help treatments for mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 11;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-109.

    PMID: 24725765BACKGROUND
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

    PMID: 16717171BACKGROUND
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

    PMID: 11556941BACKGROUND
  • Goldin PR, Ziv M, Jazaieri H, Werner K, Kraemer H, Heimberg RG, Gross JJ. Cognitive reappraisal self-efficacy mediates the effects of individual cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Dec;80(6):1034-40. doi: 10.1037/a0028555. Epub 2012 May 14.

    PMID: 22582765BACKGROUND
  • Ford BQ, Lwi SJ, Gentzler AL, Hankin B, Mauss IB. The cost of believing emotions are uncontrollable: Youths' beliefs about emotion predict emotion regulation and depressive symptoms. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Aug;147(8):1170-1190. doi: 10.1037/xge0000396. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

    PMID: 29620380BACKGROUND
  • Kelders SM, Kip H, Greeff J. Psychometric Evaluation of the TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale (TWEETS): Evaluation Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e17757. doi: 10.2196/17757.

    PMID: 33021487BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anxiety DisordersEmotional Regulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental DisordersSelf-ControlSocial BehaviorBehavior

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2022

First Posted

May 17, 2022

Study Start

May 16, 2022

Primary Completion

July 17, 2022

Study Completion

September 19, 2022

Last Updated

May 27, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share