NCT05367336

Brief Summary

The goal is to determine whether fentanyl and morphine have similar effects in reducing aspirin's effect upon platelets in emergency department patients with chest discomfort. Morphine has been shown to worsen outcomes in heart attack patients due to reduction of oral anti-platelet agent effectiveness and so many providers have switches to using fentanyl. However, it is largely unknown whether fentanyl has similar effects.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 31, 2022

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 18, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 18, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 25, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 21, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

September 23, 2021

Results QC Date

April 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 12, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Baseline Arachidonic Acid Maximum Aggregation (%) Result

    Arachidonic Acid Maximum Aggregation is assessed using light transmission aggregometry (LTA). This method involves adding arachidonic acid to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and measuring the change in light transmittance as platelets aggregate. The maximum aggregation percentage is recorded as the highest point of aggregation observed during the test. From a clinical perspective, normal aggregation is considered 70% or higher and values below 70% may indicate platelet dysfunction or the influence of antiplatelet medications such as aspirin. In this study, the control group is expected to show a significant decrease in Arachidonic Acid Maximum Aggregation (%) from the baseline to the 2-hour mark. However, this decrease is anticipated to be smaller in the groups receiving morphine and fentanyl.

    Baseline

  • 2 Hour Arachidonic Acid Maximum Aggregation (%) Result

    Arachidonic Acid Maximum Aggregation is assessed using light transmission aggregometry (LTA). This method involves adding arachidonic acid to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and measuring the change in light transmittance as platelets aggregate. The maximum aggregation percentage is recorded as the highest point of aggregation observed during the test. From a clinical perspective, normal aggregation is considered 70% or higher and values below 70% may indicate platelet dysfunction or the influence of antiplatelet medications such as aspirin. In this study, the control group is expected to show a significant decrease in Arachidonic Acid Maximum Aggregation (%) from the baseline to the 2-hour mark. However, this decrease is anticipated to be smaller in the groups receiving morphine and fentanyl.

    2 hours

Study Arms (3)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

not receiving any narcotics

Morphine

EXPERIMENTAL

the second group will be those receiving morphine

Drug: Morphine

Fentanyl

EXPERIMENTAL

the 3rd group will be those receiving fentanyl

Drug: Fentanyl

Interventions

second group will be receiving morphine

Morphine

third group receiving fentanyl

Fentanyl

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult Emergency Department patients undergoing 0 and 2 hour troponin testing
  • administered aspirin within 30 minutes of the initial blood draw.
  • patient presented via private vehicle
  • provide informed consent
  • over the age of 18

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients not expected to get a 2 hour troponin;
  • patients already on aspirin, clopidogrel, or stronger anti-coagulants;
  • patients who arrived via EMS (Emergency Medical Services) given it can be difficult to find the run reports to determine whether patient received fentanyl in the pre-hospital period;
  • pregnant patients;
  • patients on chronic narcotics;
  • patients already once enrolled in this study,
  • inability to provide consent in English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Spectrum Health Lakeland

Saint Joseph, Michigan, 49085, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

MorphineFentanyl

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Morphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Rachelle Pichot; Clinical Research Specialist
Organization
Corewell Health Lakeland

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2021

First Posted

May 10, 2022

Study Start

August 31, 2022

Primary Completion

February 18, 2025

Study Completion

February 18, 2025

Last Updated

May 21, 2025

Results First Posted

April 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared due to the early termination of the study and the limited number of participants enrolled. Sharing IPD from a small sample size could compromise participant confidentiality and privacy. Ensuring the protection of participants' personal data is a priority, and the small number of participants increases the risk of identifying individuals.

Locations