NCT05361278

Brief Summary

The process of removing bacteria and their products from the root canals is an essential step that is achieved through the combination of mechanical preparation and irrigation with chemicals. However, mechanical preparation alone can not reduce the microbial formations inside root canals, so at least about 35% of the root canal walls remain without the preparation tools reaching them. Many irrigants were used to irrigate the root canals, as sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine are the most famous. Although most studies have proven the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite with its different concentrations in accomplishing this task, some of them showed the inability of the irrigant fluid to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis inside the canals. These bacteria are highly resistant, and therefore endodontic treatment fails in the long term.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2021

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 21, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 19, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 4, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 4, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 29, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Anterior Primary TetthInfected canalschlorhexidineSodium hypochlorite

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of chlorhexidine solution.

    Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.

    24 hours after sample incubation

  • Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of activated chlorhexidine solution.

    Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.

    24 hours after sample incubation

  • Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of chlorhexidine gel.

    Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.

    24 hours after sample incubation

  • Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of activated chlorhexidine gel.

    Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.

    24 hours after sample incubation

  • Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of sodium hypochlorite solution.

    Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.

    24 hours after sample incubation

Study Arms (5)

Chlorhexidine irrigation solution

EXPERIMENTAL

CHx 2% solution will be used.

Other: Chlorhexidine solution

Activated chlorhexidine irrigation solution

EXPERIMENTAL

CHx 2% solution will be used with ultrasonic activation.

Other: Activated chlorhexidine solution

Chlorhexidine irrigation gel

EXPERIMENTAL

CHx 2% gel will be used.

Other: Chlorhexidine gel

Activated chlorhexidine irrigation gel

EXPERIMENTAL

CHx 2% gel will be used with ultrasonic activation.

Other: Activated chlorhexidine gel

Sodium hypochlorite irrigation solution

OTHER

NaOCl 5,25% solution will be used.

Other: Sodium hypochlorite solution

Interventions

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file. * Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine solution. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Chlorhexidine irrigation solution

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head. * Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine solution. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Activated chlorhexidine irrigation solution

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx gel between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the gel after using the last file. * Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine gel. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Chlorhexidine irrigation gel

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx gel between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the gel after using the last file with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head. * Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine gel. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Activated chlorhexidine irrigation gel

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file. * Irrigating the canal with 3 ml of 5% sodium thiosulfate solution to remove residual of sodium hypochlorite. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Sodium hypochlorite irrigation solution

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 9 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Definitely positive or positive ratings of Frank scale.
  • Physiological root resorption no more than the apical third
  • Symptoms or signs of pulpal necrosis with or without radial lesions (swelling - fistua - abnormal movement).
  • At least 2 mm of bone surrounding the permanent bud.
  • Children who have not taken antibiotics in the past 3 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Systematic or mental disorders.
  • Definitely negative or negative ratings of Frankel scale
  • Existence external or internal abnormal absorption.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Damascus University

Damascus, 30621, Syria

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Goud S, Aravelli S, Dronamraju S, Cherukuri G, Morishetty P. Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Aloe Vera, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, and 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Against Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study. Cureus. 2018 Oct 22;10(10):e3480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3480.

    PMID: 30648031BACKGROUND
  • Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):424-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00410.x.

    PMID: 11556507BACKGROUND
  • Ruksakiet K, Hanak L, Farkas N, Hegyi P, Sadaeng W, Czumbel LM, Sang-Ngoen T, Garami A, Miko A, Varga G, Lohinai Z. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite in Root Canal Disinfection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endod. 2020 Aug;46(8):1032-1041.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 12.

    PMID: 32413440BACKGROUND
  • Walia V, Goswami M, Mishra S, Walia N, Sahay D. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Sodium Hypochlorite, the Diode Laser and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals - An In Vivo Study. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Fall;10(4):268-274. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.44. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

    PMID: 31875118BACKGROUND
  • Tirali RE, Bodur H, Ece G. In vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine dihydrochloride in elimination of microorganisms within dentinal tubules of primary and permanent teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 May 1;17(3):e517-22. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17566.

    PMID: 22143724BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental CariesBacterial Infections

Interventions

Sodium Hypochlorite

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesBacterial Infections and MycosesInfections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hypochlorous AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsOxidesOxygen CompoundsSodium Compounds

Study Officials

  • Rahaf ِA kharsa, DDs

    MSc student in Pedodontics, University of Damascus

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mohannad G Laflouf, Phd

    Professor of Pedodontics, Department of Pedodontics, University of Damascus

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2022

First Posted

May 4, 2022

Study Start

January 15, 2021

Primary Completion

December 21, 2021

Study Completion

February 19, 2022

Last Updated

May 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations