Evaluation of Gel and Solution of Chlorhexidine in Disinfection Root Canals of Primary Anterior Teeth.
Evaluation of Irrigation Effectiveness for Gel and Solution of Chlorhexidine in Disinfection Root Canals of Primary Anterior Teeth.
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The process of removing bacteria and their products from the root canals is an essential step that is achieved through the combination of mechanical preparation and irrigation with chemicals. However, mechanical preparation alone can not reduce the microbial formations inside root canals, so at least about 35% of the root canal walls remain without the preparation tools reaching them. Many irrigants were used to irrigate the root canals, as sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine are the most famous. Although most studies have proven the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite with its different concentrations in accomplishing this task, some of them showed the inability of the irrigant fluid to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis inside the canals. These bacteria are highly resistant, and therefore endodontic treatment fails in the long term.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2022
CompletedMay 4, 2022
April 1, 2022
11 months
April 29, 2022
April 29, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of chlorhexidine solution.
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
24 hours after sample incubation
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of activated chlorhexidine solution.
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
24 hours after sample incubation
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of chlorhexidine gel.
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
24 hours after sample incubation
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of activated chlorhexidine gel.
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
24 hours after sample incubation
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of sodium hypochlorite solution.
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
24 hours after sample incubation
Study Arms (5)
Chlorhexidine irrigation solution
EXPERIMENTALCHx 2% solution will be used.
Activated chlorhexidine irrigation solution
EXPERIMENTALCHx 2% solution will be used with ultrasonic activation.
Chlorhexidine irrigation gel
EXPERIMENTALCHx 2% gel will be used.
Activated chlorhexidine irrigation gel
EXPERIMENTALCHx 2% gel will be used with ultrasonic activation.
Sodium hypochlorite irrigation solution
OTHERNaOCl 5,25% solution will be used.
Interventions
* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file. * Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine solution. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.
* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head. * Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine solution. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.
* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx gel between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the gel after using the last file. * Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine gel. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.
* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx gel between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the gel after using the last file with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head. * Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine gel. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.
* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle. * Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file. * Irrigating the canal with 3 ml of 5% sodium thiosulfate solution to remove residual of sodium hypochlorite. * Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear. * Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Definitely positive or positive ratings of Frank scale.
- Physiological root resorption no more than the apical third
- Symptoms or signs of pulpal necrosis with or without radial lesions (swelling - fistua - abnormal movement).
- At least 2 mm of bone surrounding the permanent bud.
- Children who have not taken antibiotics in the past 3 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Systematic or mental disorders.
- Definitely negative or negative ratings of Frankel scale
- Existence external or internal abnormal absorption.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Damascus University
Damascus, 30621, Syria
Related Publications (5)
Goud S, Aravelli S, Dronamraju S, Cherukuri G, Morishetty P. Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Aloe Vera, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, and 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Against Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study. Cureus. 2018 Oct 22;10(10):e3480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3480.
PMID: 30648031BACKGROUNDGomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):424-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00410.x.
PMID: 11556507BACKGROUNDRuksakiet K, Hanak L, Farkas N, Hegyi P, Sadaeng W, Czumbel LM, Sang-Ngoen T, Garami A, Miko A, Varga G, Lohinai Z. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite in Root Canal Disinfection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endod. 2020 Aug;46(8):1032-1041.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 12.
PMID: 32413440BACKGROUNDWalia V, Goswami M, Mishra S, Walia N, Sahay D. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Sodium Hypochlorite, the Diode Laser and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals - An In Vivo Study. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Fall;10(4):268-274. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.44. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
PMID: 31875118BACKGROUNDTirali RE, Bodur H, Ece G. In vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine dihydrochloride in elimination of microorganisms within dentinal tubules of primary and permanent teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 May 1;17(3):e517-22. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17566.
PMID: 22143724BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rahaf ِA kharsa, DDs
MSc student in Pedodontics, University of Damascus
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohannad G Laflouf, Phd
Professor of Pedodontics, Department of Pedodontics, University of Damascus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2022
First Posted
May 4, 2022
Study Start
January 15, 2021
Primary Completion
December 21, 2021
Study Completion
February 19, 2022
Last Updated
May 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share