NCT05356247

Brief Summary

The current study is a feasibility pilot of the Lausanne Trialogue Play paradigm Intervention - Brief (LTP-Brief), a family systems therapy implemented in a community mental health setting. We will study the ultrabrief, virtual therapy to assess the feasibility of a future pilot RCT. Feasibility metrics include resource, scientific, and management considerations, as well as an examination of pre-post change in future child and family outcomes of interest.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 2, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2022

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 12, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

March 22, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Child Mental HealthFamily SystemsCoparentingSingle arm pre-post designCOVID-19 Family Recovery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (21)

  • COVID-19-related Family Stressors

    Descriptive (no criterion for success): Family Stressor Scale. Minimum score=16, maximum score=48. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes.

    Time 0, 3

  • COVID-19-related Family Positive Adaptation

    Descriptive (no criterion for success): COVID-19 Family Positive Adaptation Scale. Minimum score=14, maximum score=42. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes.

    Time 0, 3

  • Therapeutic Alliance

    Descriptive (no criterion for success): Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR). Minimum score=12, maximum score=60. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes.

    Time 1, 2, 3, 5

  • Form Research-Clinical Partnership (1) - Clinical-Research Meetings

    Criterion for success: Meet once monthly throughout the course of the study.

    Time -1 to end of study

  • Form Research-Clinical Partnership (2) - Protocol Development - a

    Criterion for success: Administrative approval from SKCCMH for study (via approval of ethics approval).

    Time -1

  • Form Research-Clinical Partnership (3) - Protocol Development - b

    Criterion for success: Submission of protocol for registration to clinicaltrials.gov and/or journal publications.

    Time -1

  • Research-Clinical Communication (1) - Clients Referred to LTP-B

    Criterion for success: 95% of clients referred to LTP-B to be asked permission to be contacted by the research team.

    Time -1

  • Research-Clinical Communication (2) - Clients Transferred to Research Team

    Criterion for success: 95% of clients that agree to research are transferred to the research team for contact.

    Time -1

  • Research-Clinical Communication (3) - Clinical Visits Shared

    Criterion for success: 95% of participants' scheduled clinical visits to be shared with the research team.

    Time -1 to end of study

  • Research-Clinical Communication (4) - Videos Shared

    Criterion for success: 95% of participant videos (previously consented) to be successfully shared with the research team.

    Time 1, 2, 3

  • Clinical Service Flow (1) - Clients Referred

    Criterion for success: 3 families to be referred to the LTP-B per month.

    Time -1

  • Clinical Service Flow (2) - Service Provision

    Criterion for success: 2 families to be seen by the LTP-B team per month.

    Time -1

  • Participant Recruitment (1) - Agree to Research Contact

    Criterion for success: 90% of clients referred to LTP-B to agree to be contacted for purposes of research.

    Time -1

  • Participant Recruitment (2) - Participants Enrolled

    Criterion for success: 90% of clients participating in LTP-B to enroll in the research study.

    Time -1

  • Participant Recruitment (3) Families Enrolled Per Month

    Criterion for success: 1.8 families enrolled per month.

    Time -1

  • Adherence to Intervention

    Criterion for success: 90% of participants to complete all three main LTP-B sessions (Family assessment, videofeedback, check in)

    Times 1, 2, 3

  • Retention: Post-Intervention

    Criterion for success: 90% of participants to remain in study until the end of post-intervention assessment.

    Time 3

  • Retention: Follow-Up

    Criterion for success: 80% of participants to remain in study until the end of follow-up assessment.

    Time 4

  • Retention: Brief Surveys

    Criterion for success: 80% of participants to complete all brief surveys.

    Time 1, 2, 5

  • Acceptability

    Criterion for success: 80 % of participants reporting at least "agree" on indicators of attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, and ethicality on an Implementation Acceptability Scale. Minimum score=7, maximum scores=35. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes.

    Time 3, 4

  • Descriptive (no criterion for success): Behavioral Coding of Family Interactions (Frascarolo et al., 2018)

    Family interactions will be behaviourally coded by trained coders based on the LTP Assessments (initial family assessment), using previously validated approaches (e.g., Frasarolo et al., 2018).

    Week 1

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Brief Dyadic Adjustment

    Time 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  • Coparenting Relationship Quality

    Time 0, 3, 4

  • Brief Coparenting Relationship Quality

    Time 1, 2, 5

  • Parent-Child Positivity

    Time 0, 3, 4

  • Parent-Child Negativity

    Time 0, 3, 4

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

LTP-B Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Families will take part in an online semi-structured assessment and video feedback paradigm of family interactions, with an emphasis on co-parenting and parent-child relations.

Behavioral: Lausanne Trialogue Play Brief

Interventions

The brief treatment program will consist of an LTP family assessment with video feedback to caregivers to address family interaction patterns and child mental health. Families will participate in four sessions conducted online using the Zoom for Healthcare platform. In the first session, families will engage in a family assessment in different groupings that will be recoded on zoom and used later in the treatment. In the second session, taking place one week later, families will take part in a mini assessment to learn more about the difficulties of the child. In the third session, the clinical team will share videos of the family assessment to the parents and discuss the families strengths, concerns, and goals for moving forward. In the fourth session, taking place one month after the third session, families will participate in a check-in session, debriefing the family assessment.

Also known as: LTP-B
LTP-B Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Months - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • The sample will comprise of families referred to the outpatient mental health services at Sick Kids Center for Community Mental Health (SKCCMH), a non-profit children's mental health treatment centre in Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Participants will include children ages 0 months to 15.11 years old, and their caregivers, though the majority will fall in the range of 3- to 14-years-old.
  • The first 25 families to be referred to the LTP-B service and who agree to participate in research will be included.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

York University

Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Problem Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorChild Behavior

Study Officials

  • Heather Prime, PhD

    York University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Heather Prime, PhD

CONTACT

Diane Philipps, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2022

First Posted

May 2, 2022

Study Start

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion

September 1, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2023

Last Updated

July 12, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Locations