Implementing Oral Care Bundle on Critical Care Nurses' Practice and Mechanically Ventilated Patients' Outcomes
The Effect of Implementing Oral Care Bundle on Critical Care Nurses' Practice and Mechanically Ventilated Patients' Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Oral care is a fundamental aspect of nursing that impact the health and comfort of patients over both the short and long term. Caring for very sick patients in a busy stressful environment may result in oral care having a lower priority for nurses than other aspects of care (Sarangi, Simon, \& Sarangi, 2021). Negligence of these interventions can cause long-term oral problems and nosocomial diseases most notably VAP (Abd Alraheem, 2020). A study conducted by Ayşe et al. (2019) reported that the application of regular oral care for the MV patients as a part of care protocols decreased bacterial colonization and had a protective and improving effect on oral health. A recent study conducted by Rizk, Saad-eldeen and Helmy (2020) concluded that VAP is a serious ICU acquired infection with significant impact and required effective preventive action. A systematic review conducted by Kharel, Bist and Mishra (2021) concluded that VAP is a critical issue in ICU with a high-cost burden and various interventional educational programs like staff training and hygiene awareness can reduce the future risk of VAP. A recent study conducted by Abd Alraheem (2020) illustrated that 53.3% of the MV patients had average oral alteration. Asystematic review conducted by Kharel et al. (2021) to assess VAP among ICU patients in WHO South east Asian region illustrated that the VAP incidence rate ranged from 0.2% to 11.6% differing greatly between countries. The highest VAP prevalence rate was reported from the medical ICU, India, where as the lowest was from the palliative care ICU, South Korea. In Egypt, analysis of VAP was done in some Egyptian University Hospitals by Fathy, Abdelhafeez, EL-Gilany and Abd Elhafez, (2013) who reported that the incidence of VAP ranged from 16% to 75%, the lowest ratio was in Alexandria University 16% and the highest one in Ain Shams University 75%. The incidence in Mansoura University Hospitals (MUH) was 22.6%. Another recent study conducted by Elkolaly, Bahr, El-Shafey, Basuoni, and Elber (2019) reported that the incidence of VAP in Tanta University Hospitals is still high (38.4%). Many studies investigated the effect of oral care with chlorhexidine on the incidence of VAP and oral health in MV patients (Abd Alraheem, 2020; Collins et al., 2020; Heck, 2012; Moustafa, Tantawey, El-Soussi and Ramadan, 2016; Plantinga et al., 2016). However, the recent reappraisal of the evidence suggests that chlorhexidine does not reduce VAP, causes excess mortality in non-cardiac surgery patients (Dale et al., 2019) and unexpected high incidence of oral mucosal lesions (Plantinga et al., 2016). Moreover, from my empirical experience, chlorhexidine is not available in all Egyptian hospitals because of its economic burden. A study conducted by Moustafa et al. (2016) recommended regular updates about evidence-based guidelines for oral care and its effect on VAP prevention and oral health. The debate of the literature about oral care inspired us to investigate this area.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedApril 28, 2022
April 1, 2022
8 months
April 22, 2022
April 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
oral health
The oral assessment scale will be used to assess the oral health. It is composed of 6 items including the lips, tongue, saliva, mucous membrane, gums, and teeth.
one week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Ventilator associated pneumonia
one week
Study Arms (2)
An intervention group
EXPERIMENTALAn intervention group: will include 41 patients who will receive the oral care bundle.
A control group
NO INTERVENTIONA control group: will include 41 patients who will receive the traditional oral care.
Interventions
oral care bundle encompasses oral assessment, tooth brushing, oral / lip moisturization, and suctioning oropharyngeal secretions above the cuff.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient \> 18 years old.
- Orally intubated mechanically ventilated patients for at least 48 hours.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded from the study if they have:
- A clinical diagnosis of pneumonia at the time of admission and/or a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score of 6 or greater.
- Contraindication to oral care intervention such as severe oral trauma, oral ulcerations, facial fractures, or unstable cervical fractures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mansoura Emergency Hospital
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2022
First Posted
April 28, 2022
Study Start
February 1, 2022
Primary Completion
October 1, 2022
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04