NCT05344937

Brief Summary

Men over 40 years of age, and women over 50, smokers or former smokers with a smoking rate greater than 10 packs/year and the presence of microhematuria \>25 red blood cells per field in the microscopic analysis are at high risk of bladder cancer, so cystoscopy and uroTAC is advised in the AUA Guidelines. The investigators hypothesize if cystoscopy can be omitted in case of having a negative biomarker test and a normal uro-CT. Main objective: To determine sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of "Uromonitor" (molecular DNA based urine marker) in the included population, in relation to the presence of urothelial cancer in the bladder, comparing it with cystoscopy.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
343

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 19, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2022

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 2, 2022

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

April 19, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of Uromonitor in diagnosis of bladder cancer in high risk micro hematuria

    Specificity, sensibility, negative and positive predictive value of Uromonitor in high risk microhematuria patients

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • acuracy of Uromonitor in diagnosis of high grade bladder tumours in this population

    18 months

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Men and women seen for being at risk of lung cancer are included, and who present microhematuria above 25 red blood cells per field, so they are also at high risk for bladder cancer.

You may qualify if:

  • Men over 40 years of age or Women over 50 years of age.
  • Smokers or former smokers
  • Smoking rate \>10 packs/year
  • Microhematuria with \>25 red blood cells per hpf.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who refuse to undergo cystoscopy.
  • Patients who refuse or cannot perform imaging tests of the upper section due to allergy or chronic kidney disease.
  • History of macroscopic hematuria.
  • History of microscopic hematuria already known and studied.
  • Known cause of microhematuria: e.g. urinary infection, bladder lithiasis
  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinica Universidad de Navarra

Madrid, 28027, Spain

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, Downs TM, Gross CP, Hamilton BD, Kobashi KC, Lipman RR, Lotan Y, Ng CK, Nielsen ME, Peterson AC, Raman JD, Smith-Bindman R, Souter LH. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-786. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001297. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

    PMID: 32698717BACKGROUND
  • Laukhtina E, Shim SR, Mori K, D'Andrea D, Soria F, Rajwa P, Mostafaei H, Comperat E, Cimadamore A, Moschini M, Teoh JY, Enikeev D, Xylinas E, Lotan Y, Palou J, Gontero P, Babjuk M, Witjes JA, Kamat AM, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Pradere B; European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU): Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Novel Urinary Biomarker Tests in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):927-942. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Nov 6.

    PMID: 34753702BACKGROUND
  • Sieverink CA, Batista RPM, Prazeres HJM, Vinagre J, Sampaio C, Leao RR, Maximo V, Witjes JA, Soares P. Clinical Validation of a Urine Test (Uromonitor-V2(R)) for the Surveillance of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 24;10(10):745. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10100745.

    PMID: 32987933BACKGROUND

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

Urine DNA

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Felipe Villacampa, MD

    Clinica Universidad de Navarra

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Felipe Villacampa

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Month
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2022

First Posted

April 25, 2022

Study Start

May 2, 2022

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

May 1, 2024

Last Updated

May 2, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Locations