Comparing a Diagnostic and Treatment Strategy of Upfront CTCA With SOC in Patients With Chest Pain and Suspected CAD
CLEAR-CAD
Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of a Diagnostic and Treatment Strategy of Upfront CTCA Plus Selective Non-invasive Functional Imaging Compared With Standard Care in Patients With Chest Pain and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
6,444
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Patients with chest pain usually undergo multiple diagnostic examinations to demonstrate or rule out atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD). In addition to high healthcare costs, some of the examinations do not assess the presence of CAD, which means that patients may be undertreated and are at risk for myocardial infarction. A uniform diagnostic and treatment strategy that uses computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) as initial examination may reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and may reduce healthcare costs. In addition, we hypothesize that this strategy improves angina-related health status and reduces the number of invasive coronary angiograms (CAG's). Objectives:
- To show that the intervention is non-inferior to the control with regards to clinical outcomes
- To show superiority of the intervention with regards to clinical outcomes Study design: National multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial. Study population: Patients with suspected stable CAD. Intervention: upfront CTCA to diagnose CAD and guide optimal medical therapy (OMT). Patients with obstructive CAD and refractory angina despite OMT will undergo non-invasive ischemia imaging to guide revascularization. Control: Standard of care. Diagnosis and treatment are at the discretion of the attending cardiologist. Main study end point: Composite of all-cause mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2026
ExpectedJuly 20, 2023
July 1, 2023
3 years
April 19, 2022
July 19, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite of all-cause mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction
1 Year
Study Arms (2)
CTCA
EXPERIMENTALStandard care
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \>18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Presentation with acute coronary syndrome
- Acute coronary syndrome within last 3 months
- History of obstructive coronary artery disease on imaging
- History of PCI and/or CABG
- Severe renal failure
- Severe allergy to ionidated contrast medium
- Known pregnancy
- Patients with an estimated life expectancy of less than 1 year
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2022
First Posted
April 25, 2022
Study Start
September 14, 2022
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Last Updated
July 20, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07