Impact on Management of the HEART Risk Score in Chest Pain Patients
HEART-Impact
Cost-effectiveness Study of the HEART Score in the Management of Patients With Chest Pain Presenting in the Emergency Room
1 other identifier
interventional
3,666
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Aim of this study is to quantify the impact of the use of the HEART risk score on patient outcome and on costs in patients with chest pain presenting at the emergency room, as compared to not using the score.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2013
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 25, 2019
CompletedJanuary 25, 2019
August 1, 2018
1.3 years
December 20, 2012
April 26, 2017
August 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Events)
occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e. acute myocardial infarction (AMI), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) or death) within 6 weeks after presentation
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Cost-effectiveness (Costs, QoL, QALYs)
3 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Gender-related Differences in Risk for MACE
3 months
Pre-specified Subgroup Analyses
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
usual care
OTHERDaily practice of the cardiologist or attending emergency doctor, in order to diagnose a patient with chest pain. In this period attending doctors assess the risk of a patient with chest pain, based on his/hers experience and various criteria (for example described in European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation, without a formal risk score).
use of HEART risk score
OTHERsee intervention
Interventions
During 14 months, patients presenting with chest pain to the ED of participating hospitals will be included in the study. First, all hospitals will apply 'usual care' to all patients, i.e. risk assessment and subsequent management without application of the HEART score. Then, during a 14 month period, each 1,5 month 1 randomly allocated hospital will sequentially start to apply the HEART score in all chest pain patients (intervention period); during this intervention period patients with a HEART score 0-3 will not be admitted to the hospital, and patients with a HEART score above 3 will be treated according to current guidelines.
During 14 months, patients presenting with chest pain to the ED of participating hospitals will be included in the study. First, all hospitals will apply 'usual care' to all patients, i.e. risk assessment and subsequent management without application of the HEART score. Then, during a 14 month period, each 1,5 month 1 randomly allocated hospital will sequentially start to apply the HEART score in all chest pain patients (intervention period); during this intervention period patients with a HEART score 0-3 will not be admitted to the hospital, and patients with a HEART score above 3 will be treated according to current guidelines.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients presenting with chest pain to the (cardiac) ED of ten participating Dutch hospitals, older than 18 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Children (age \<18 years) are excluded from study participation. Subjects who are (for whatever reason) not able to fill in questionnaires are excluded from study participation. Legal incapacity of every patient will be assessed by the attending doctor, according to the guidelines of legal incapacity. In case of doubt, consultation of the cardiologist (primary local investigator) will be possible.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Amstelland Hospital
Amstelveen, Netherlands
VU Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Gelderse Vallei
Ede, Netherlands
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Atrium Medical Center
Heerlen, Netherlands
St. Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Diakonessenhuis
Utrecht, Netherlands
University Medical Center
Utrecht, Netherlands
Zuwe Hofpoort
Woerden, Netherlands
Related Publications (10)
Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JH, Gibler WB, Moll FL, Doevendans PA. Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011 Feb;7(1):2-8. doi: 10.2174/157340311795677662.
PMID: 22294968BACKGROUNDBackus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, Mast TP, van den Akker F, Mast EG, Monnink SH, van Tooren RM, Doevendans PA. Chest pain in the emergency room: a multicenter validation of the HEART Score. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010 Sep;9(3):164-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181ec36d8.
PMID: 20802272BACKGROUNDSix AJ, Backus BE, Doevendans PA. Rapid diagnostic protocol for patients with chest pain. Lancet. 2011 Jul 30;378(9789):398; author reply 398-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61204-X. No abstract available.
PMID: 21803199BACKGROUNDSix AJ, Backus BE, Kingma A, Kaandorp SI. Consumption of diagnostic procedures and other cardiology care in chest pain patients after presentation at the emergency department. Neth Heart J. 2012 Dec;20(12):499-504. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0322-6.
PMID: 23090421BACKGROUNDSix AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score. Neth Heart J. 2008 Jun;16(6):191-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03086144.
PMID: 18665203BACKGROUNDNieuwets A, Poldervaart JM, Reitsma JB, Buitendijk S, Six AJ, Backus BE, Hoes AW, Doevendans PA. Medical consumption compared for TIMI and HEART score in chest pain patients at the emergency department: a retrospective cost analysis. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 16;6(6):e010694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010694.
PMID: 27311905BACKGROUNDPoldervaart JM, Reitsma JB, Koffijberg H, Backus BE, Six AJ, Doevendans PA, Hoes AW. The impact of the HEART risk score in the early assessment of patients with acute chest pain: design of a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013 Sep 26;13:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-77.
PMID: 24070098BACKGROUNDBackus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, Bosschaert MA, Mast EG, Mosterd A, Veldkamp RF, Wardeh AJ, Tio R, Braam R, Monnink SH, van Tooren R, Mast TP, van den Akker F, Cramer MJ, Poldervaart JM, Hoes AW, Doevendans PA. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.255. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PMID: 23465250BACKGROUNDPoldervaart JM, Reitsma JB, Backus BE, Koffijberg H, Veldkamp RF, Ten Haaf ME, Appelman Y, Mannaerts HFJ, van Dantzig JM, van den Heuvel M, El Farissi M, Rensing BJWM, Ernst NMSKJ, Dekker IMC, den Hartog FR, Oosterhof T, Lagerweij GR, Buijs EM, van Hessen MWJ, Landman MAJ, van Kimmenade RRJ, Cozijnsen L, Bucx JJJ, van Ofwegen-Hanekamp CEE, Cramer MJ, Six AJ, Doevendans PA, Hoes AW. Effect of Using the HEART Score in Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):689-697. doi: 10.7326/M16-1600. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
PMID: 28437795RESULTPoldervaart JM, Langedijk M, Backus BE, Dekker IMC, Six AJ, Doevendans PA, Hoes AW, Reitsma JB. Comparison of the GRACE, HEART and TIMI score to predict major adverse cardiac events in chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:656-661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.080. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
PMID: 27810290RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Hesitance to refrain from admission and testing in patients with low scores could explain the low impact on health care costs.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Judith Poldervaart
- Organization
- University Medical Center Utrectht
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arno W Hoes, MD, PhD
UMC Utrecht
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Clinical Epidemiology & General Practice and Chair, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2012
First Posted
December 28, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 25, 2019
Results First Posted
January 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-08