NCT05344079

Brief Summary

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the major orthopedic surgeries that cause severe postoperative pain. 60% of the patients undergoing TKA have severe pain and 30% have moderate pain postoperatively. Many methods are used in the effective treatment of pain after TKA. The administration of analgesic drugs to the wound site in the form of local infiltration is included in the pain treatment both as an independent technique and in addition to multimodal analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Epidural analgesia (EA) is known for its place in the treatment of pain after TKA and its suppressive effect on the stress response. Similar to the study, no publication was found in the literature that evaluated the suppression of surgical stress response and the effectiveness of local infiltrative analgesia (LIA) in lower extremity surgery. Therefore, it was aimed in the study to compare the effects of EA and LIA on postoperative pain and stress response in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 3, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2017

Completed
5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 18, 2022

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

April 18, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

analgesiaknee arthroplastyepiduralinfiltrativestress

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual analog scale

    Following surgery, the patient's pain level will be recorded in a visual analog scale (VAS) at 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours. VAS assessment was done by asking the patient to mark a point on a 10 cm horizontal line that shows (initial "no pain", end "unbearable pain") the start and end points and is equivalent to the pain on this line.

    From 4 hours to 24 hours postoperative

Study Arms (2)

Epidural

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this group were entered the epidural space from the midline using the loss of resistance method with an 18-Gauge Touhy (Egemen®, Combifix Standard Spinal Epidural Combined Set, İzmir, Turkey) needle from the L4-L5 or L5-S1 vertebral space.

Device: 18-Gauge Touhy (Egemen®, Combifix Standard Spinal Epidural Combined Set, İzmir, Turkey)

local infiltrative analgesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

At the end of the operation, a 20-gauge infiltrative analgesia catheter connected to an ON-Q elastomeric pump that provides 5 mL/hour infusion prepared with 60 mL of 0.9% NaCl + 60 mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine (Bustesin®, 0.5% Spinal Heavy Vem Pharmaceuticals, Turkey) was placed on the fascia by the surgeon in such a way that all the holes of the catheter were under the skin and parallel to the incision line.

Device: 20-gauge infiltrative analgesia catheter connected to an ON-Q elastomeric pump

Interventions

Patients in this group were entered the epidural space from the midline using the loss of resistance method with an 18-Gauge Touhy (Egemen®, Combifix Standard Spinal Epidural Combined Set, İzmir, Turkey) needle from the L4-L5 or L5-S1 vertebral space. After the free cerebrospinal fluid flow is observed by passing the spinal needle through the epidural needle, spinal anaesthesia was maintained with 10-15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (Bustesin®, 0.5% Spinal Heavy Vem Pharmaceuticals, Turkey). After the epidural catheter was fixed in such a way that it remained 5 cm in the epidural space, the adapter was inserted and fixed. Whether the catheter is in place or not was checked by 2 mL (40 mg) Lidocaine (Aritmal®, 2% 100 mg/5 mL amp., Biosel, Turkey) + 1/2000000 adrenaline test dose.

Epidural

spinal anesthesia was maintained with 10-15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine (Bustesin 0.5% Spinal Heavy; Vem Pharmaceutical Industry and Trade Ltd.) after free cerebrospinal fluid flow was observed by entering the subarachnoid space with a 22 G spinal needle (Egemen Quincke Sharpened Spinal Anesthesia Needle; İzmir) from the L4-L5 or L5-S1 vertebral space. At the end of the operation, a 20-gauge infiltrative analgesia catheter connected to an ON-Q elastomeric pump that provides 5 mL/hour infusion prepared with 60 mL of 0.9% NaCl + 60 mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine (Marcaine 0.5%; AstraZeneca Industry and Trade Ltd.) was placed on the fascia by the surgeon in such a way that all the holes of the catheter were under the skin and parallel to the incision line. Pain pump and the catheter was withdrawn at the end of the postoperative 24th hour.

local infiltrative analgesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsIt is known that gender difference is different in both stress response and pain perception. Therefore, only female patients and patients who will undergo a single TKA were included in the study in order to standardize the study. (Rosen S, Ham B, Mogil JS. Sex differences in neuroimmunity and pain. J Neurosci Res 2017;95:500-508)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA II and III,
  • Aged between 18-80 years,
  • who were scheduled to undergo unilateral knee arthroplasty,
  • who giving consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • who will undergo an extra surgical procedure or who will undergo bilateral knee arthroplasty,
  • those with local anaesthetic sensitivity,
  • morbidly obese,
  • those with additional pathology that may constitute a contraindication to the application of regional anaesthesia,
  • those who did not give voluntary consent,
  • had a history of anticoagulant drug use,
  • had a history of cerebrovascular disease,
  • who received steroid therapy for any disease, were diabetic,
  • had a homeostasis assessment score (HOMA) above 2.5.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Samsun Research and Education Hospital

Samsun, 55090, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Berninger MT, Friederichs J, Leidinger W, Augat P, Buhren V, Fulghum C, Reng W. Effect of local infiltration analgesia, peripheral nerve blocks, general and spinal anesthesia on early functional recovery and pain control in total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 18;19(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2154-z.

  • Peng XQ, Fei ZG, Sun CG, Zhou QJ. Efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia for pain management in total knee and hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20640. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020640.

  • Gibbison B, Angelini GD, Lightman SL. Dynamic output and control of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in critical illness and major surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;111(3):347-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet077. Epub 2013 May 9.

  • Fusco P, Cofini V, Petrucci E, Scimia P, Fiorenzi M, Paladini G, Behr AU, Borghi B, Flamini S, Pizzoferrato R, Colafarina O, Di Francesco A, Tabacco T, Necozione S, Marinangeli F. Continuous wound infusion and local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain and rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 May;84(5):556-564. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12110-3. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

  • Li C, Qu J, Pan S, Qu Y. Local infiltration anesthesia versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 May 16;13(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0770-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Zahide Doganay, Professor

    Samsun Research and Education Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anesthesiologist, Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2022

First Posted

April 25, 2022

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

March 3, 2017

Study Completion

May 1, 2017

Last Updated

April 29, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Researched data and statistical analyzes will be available from the journal in which the clinical study was published.

Locations