Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Analgesia and Local Infiltrative Analgesia Methods on Pain Control
Comparison of Epidural Analgesia and Local Infiltrative Analgesia
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the major orthopedic surgeries that cause severe postoperative pain. 60% of the patients undergoing TKA have severe pain and 30% have moderate pain postoperatively. Many methods are used in the effective treatment of pain after TKA. The administration of analgesic drugs to the wound site in the form of local infiltration is included in the pain treatment both as an independent technique and in addition to multimodal analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Epidural analgesia (EA) is known for its place in the treatment of pain after TKA and its suppressive effect on the stress response. Similar to the study, no publication was found in the literature that evaluated the suppression of surgical stress response and the effectiveness of local infiltrative analgesia (LIA) in lower extremity surgery. Therefore, it was aimed in the study to compare the effects of EA and LIA on postoperative pain and stress response in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2022
CompletedApril 29, 2022
April 1, 2022
10 months
April 18, 2022
April 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual analog scale
Following surgery, the patient's pain level will be recorded in a visual analog scale (VAS) at 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours. VAS assessment was done by asking the patient to mark a point on a 10 cm horizontal line that shows (initial "no pain", end "unbearable pain") the start and end points and is equivalent to the pain on this line.
From 4 hours to 24 hours postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Epidural
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group were entered the epidural space from the midline using the loss of resistance method with an 18-Gauge Touhy (Egemen®, Combifix Standard Spinal Epidural Combined Set, İzmir, Turkey) needle from the L4-L5 or L5-S1 vertebral space.
local infiltrative analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORAt the end of the operation, a 20-gauge infiltrative analgesia catheter connected to an ON-Q elastomeric pump that provides 5 mL/hour infusion prepared with 60 mL of 0.9% NaCl + 60 mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine (Bustesin®, 0.5% Spinal Heavy Vem Pharmaceuticals, Turkey) was placed on the fascia by the surgeon in such a way that all the holes of the catheter were under the skin and parallel to the incision line.
Interventions
Patients in this group were entered the epidural space from the midline using the loss of resistance method with an 18-Gauge Touhy (Egemen®, Combifix Standard Spinal Epidural Combined Set, İzmir, Turkey) needle from the L4-L5 or L5-S1 vertebral space. After the free cerebrospinal fluid flow is observed by passing the spinal needle through the epidural needle, spinal anaesthesia was maintained with 10-15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (Bustesin®, 0.5% Spinal Heavy Vem Pharmaceuticals, Turkey). After the epidural catheter was fixed in such a way that it remained 5 cm in the epidural space, the adapter was inserted and fixed. Whether the catheter is in place or not was checked by 2 mL (40 mg) Lidocaine (Aritmal®, 2% 100 mg/5 mL amp., Biosel, Turkey) + 1/2000000 adrenaline test dose.
spinal anesthesia was maintained with 10-15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine (Bustesin 0.5% Spinal Heavy; Vem Pharmaceutical Industry and Trade Ltd.) after free cerebrospinal fluid flow was observed by entering the subarachnoid space with a 22 G spinal needle (Egemen Quincke Sharpened Spinal Anesthesia Needle; İzmir) from the L4-L5 or L5-S1 vertebral space. At the end of the operation, a 20-gauge infiltrative analgesia catheter connected to an ON-Q elastomeric pump that provides 5 mL/hour infusion prepared with 60 mL of 0.9% NaCl + 60 mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine (Marcaine 0.5%; AstraZeneca Industry and Trade Ltd.) was placed on the fascia by the surgeon in such a way that all the holes of the catheter were under the skin and parallel to the incision line. Pain pump and the catheter was withdrawn at the end of the postoperative 24th hour.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA II and III,
- Aged between 18-80 years,
- who were scheduled to undergo unilateral knee arthroplasty,
- who giving consent.
You may not qualify if:
- who will undergo an extra surgical procedure or who will undergo bilateral knee arthroplasty,
- those with local anaesthetic sensitivity,
- morbidly obese,
- those with additional pathology that may constitute a contraindication to the application of regional anaesthesia,
- those who did not give voluntary consent,
- had a history of anticoagulant drug use,
- had a history of cerebrovascular disease,
- who received steroid therapy for any disease, were diabetic,
- had a homeostasis assessment score (HOMA) above 2.5.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsun Research and Education Hospital
Samsun, 55090, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Berninger MT, Friederichs J, Leidinger W, Augat P, Buhren V, Fulghum C, Reng W. Effect of local infiltration analgesia, peripheral nerve blocks, general and spinal anesthesia on early functional recovery and pain control in total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 18;19(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2154-z.
PMID: 30021587RESULTPeng XQ, Fei ZG, Sun CG, Zhou QJ. Efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia for pain management in total knee and hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20640. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020640.
PMID: 32481477RESULTGibbison B, Angelini GD, Lightman SL. Dynamic output and control of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in critical illness and major surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;111(3):347-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet077. Epub 2013 May 9.
PMID: 23661405RESULTFusco P, Cofini V, Petrucci E, Scimia P, Fiorenzi M, Paladini G, Behr AU, Borghi B, Flamini S, Pizzoferrato R, Colafarina O, Di Francesco A, Tabacco T, Necozione S, Marinangeli F. Continuous wound infusion and local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain and rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 May;84(5):556-564. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12110-3. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
PMID: 28984095RESULTLi C, Qu J, Pan S, Qu Y. Local infiltration anesthesia versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 May 16;13(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0770-9.
PMID: 29769140RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Zahide Doganay, Professor
Samsun Research and Education Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2022
First Posted
April 25, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 3, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Researched data and statistical analyzes will be available from the journal in which the clinical study was published.