Validity of an AI-based Program to Identify Foods and Estimate Food Portion Size
PortionSizeAI
Testing the Validity of an Artificial Intelligence-based Program to Identify Foods and Estimate Food Portion Size Among Adults, a Pilot Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the accuracy of the Nutrition Artificial Intelligence in the Openfit app during meals in a controlled laboratory setting
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 3, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 18, 2023
CompletedNovember 18, 2023
November 1, 2023
1 month
April 12, 2022
August 24, 2023
November 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Identification of Food Plated Using the Openfit Mobile App
Agreement surrounding identification of food and beverages provided compared with known identification, at the item level, and across all items where identification is determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated) For a food identified through the Nutrition AI to be considered an exact food match, the name of the food identified must match or be a close match to the food served. For example, a fruit cocktail identified as a fruit salad is an acceptable match. Proportions will be used to assess whether the percentage of food items plated that were correctly identified by Nutrition AI is different to the percentage of foods correctly identified by a criterion method (human rater). Descriptive data will also be used to describe the frequency at which food plated was correctly identified for all food items across all participants. In total there was 255 food items tested across all participants.
One study visit of ~2 hours
Portion Size Estimation (kcal) of Food Plated Using the Openfit Mobile App
Error between mean estimates of food plated (kcal) and known food plated (kcal), determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without user correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated) Mean error and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed to determine errors in estimation of food plated from the Nutrition AI compared to estimations from the criterion measure (weighed food).
One study visit of ~2 hours
User Satisfaction of the Openfit Mobile App for Recording Food Plated
After completing assessment of food plated, participants will complete a user satisfaction survey (USS). The USS was adapted from a previous version used to assess the usability of a mobile application for dietary assessment. The USS includes five quantitative questions and three open response questions. The quantitative questions will each be scored using a 6-point Likert scale, with 1 being the lowest and worst score, and 6 being the highest and best score. Data for each of the five quantitative responses in the USS will be averaged across participants and presented separately as mean (SD). Open responses will be evaluated using qualitative methods to identify common themes.
One study visit of ~2 hours
Usability of the Openfit Mobile App for Recording Food Plated
Participants will complete the Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSUQ). The CSUQ is frequently used to assess the usability of mobile applications. The CSUQ consists of 19 questions, each scored using a 7-point Likert scale (with 1 being the lowest and best score and 7 being the highest and worst score) and participants will rate satisfaction, usefulness, information quality, and interface quality of the Openfit app. The average of these 19 questions (1 being the best average score and 7 being the worst average score) provides an overall usability score.
One study visit of ~2 hours
Study Arms (1)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTAL* Training and use of Openfit * Using the app to estimate food intake from simulated meals in a laboratory at PBRC or LSU (participants will not eat food during the meals) * Rating the usability and satisfaction of the app
Interventions
For this pilot study, using a convenience sample, the investigators will recruit up to 25 adults to use the Nutrition AI technology in Openfit to identify and estimate portion size of foods provided in a laboratory setting at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (PBRC) and/or Louisiana State University (LSU). Laboratory members within the Ingestive Behavioral Laboratory will also test the ability of Nutrition AI to identify foods and to quantify foods provided in the laboratory. Meals will be simulated, and participants will not consume the foods provided.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female
- Aged 18-62 years
- Self-reported body mass index (BMI) 18.5-50 kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- Any condition or circumstance that could impede study completion
- Unfamiliar with or not able to use an iPhone
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808, United States
Related Publications (1)
Lozano CP, Canty EN, Saha S, Broyles ST, Beyl RA, Apolzan JW, Martin CK. Validity of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Application to Identify Foods and Estimate Energy Intake Among Adults: A Pilot Study. Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Sep 29;7(11):102009. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102009. eCollection 2023 Nov.
PMID: 38026571DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chloe Panizza Lozano
- Organization
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chloe P Lozano, PhD
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2022
First Posted
April 25, 2022
Study Start
April 27, 2022
Primary Completion
June 3, 2022
Study Completion
June 3, 2022
Last Updated
November 18, 2023
Results First Posted
November 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Any identifiers might be removed from the participants identifiable information and after such removal, the information could be used for future research studies or given to another investigator for future research without additional informed consent from the subject or legally authorized representative.