NCT05341674

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to develop an artificial intelligence-based autonomous socket recommendation program that will provide a more comfortable and easier test socket production with high time-cost efficiency and to share experiences about socket designs in these processes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
101

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 10, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 10, 2022

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 22, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 22, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

April 10, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Software ( Artificial Intelligence Based Autonomous Socket Proposal Program)

    The foresight of the software to be developed will be evaluated. It will be evaluated how suitable a socket design can be suggested for the stump dimensions entered into the system. Thanks to the software, the time taken for socket design will be compared with the time taken for sockets produced with classical methods. The time/cost effectiveness of the software will be evaluated.

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

Model of the stump scanned with a 3d scanner

For the artificial intelligence-based software planned to be created, the stumps of all patients were scanned with the Artec Eva Lite brand 3D scanner. The scanned patterns were saved as point clouds

Other: the stumps of all patients were scanned with the Artec Eva Lite brand 3D scanner.

Socket matched to stump

The socket parts of the prostheses used by the same patients (with other group) were also scanned with the same scanner device and recorded.

Interventions

the stumps of all patients were scanned with the Artec Eva Lite brand 3D scanner.

Model of the stump scanned with a 3d scanner

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients aged between 18-45 years with amputation who came to Hasan Kalyoncu University and who met the inclusion criteria of the study.

You may qualify if:

  • \- Conscious patients \>18 years old having undergone amputation surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe visual and perception impairment
  • Surgical intervention with functional sequelae in the extremities
  • Pain that does not allow tests to be done
  • Patients with diseases with neurological dysfunction (stroke, multiple sclerosis, etc.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hasan Kalyoncu University

Gaziantep, Şahinbey, 27000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Ten Kate J, Smit G, Breedveld P. 3D-printed upper limb prostheses: a review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Apr;12(3):300-314. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1253117. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

  • O'Brien L, Cho E, Khara A, Lavranos J, Lommerse L, Chen C. 3D-printed custom-designed prostheses for partial hand amputation: Mechanical challenges still exist. J Hand Ther. 2021 Oct-Dec;34(4):539-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

  • Vujaklija I, Farina D. 3D printed upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Jul;15(7):505-512. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1494568. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

  • Abbady HEMA, Klinkenberg ETM, de Moel L, Nicolai N, van der Stelt M, Verhulst AC, Maal TJJ, Brouwers L. 3D-printed prostheses in developing countries: A systematic review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022 Feb 1;46(1):19-30. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000057.

Study Officials

  • Murat ÇINAR, Doctor

    Hasan Kalyoncu University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, PhD,

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2022

First Posted

April 22, 2022

Study Start

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion

June 10, 2021

Study Completion

March 1, 2022

Last Updated

April 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations