NCT05340946

Brief Summary

Comparison of the effect of two anaesthesia methods in preventing perioperative myocardial infarction in patients with cardiac risk undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 5, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 5, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 15, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 17, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 22, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 22, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

April 17, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • brain natriuretic peptide

    marker for myocardial infarction

    immediately preoperatively

  • brain natriuretic peptide

    marker for myocardial infarction

    after 48 hours post-operatively

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • visual analogue scale

    after 6 hour postoperatively

  • amount of analgesic consumption

    after 48 hour postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Group (G)

EXPERIMENTAL

received general anaesthesia followed by IV patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA).

Procedure: general anaesthesia

Group (F)

EXPERIMENTAL

received spinal anaesthesia followed by continuous ultrasound guided femoral never block once the anaesthesia-induced motor block resolved.

Procedure: spinal anaesthesia

Interventions

intraoperative general anaesthesia followed by postoperative IV patient analgesia

Also known as: intravenous patient controlled analgesia
Group (G)

patient received spinal followed by continuous ultrasound guided femoral never block.

Also known as: ultrasound guided femoral never block
Group (F)

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • presence and/or risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as planned lower extremity surgery was considered. Presence of CAD was ascertained by history of myocardial infarction and diagnosis of typical angina or atypical angina with a positive stress test \& ECG finding. Risk for CAD included age (\> 65 years old), hypertension, smoking habit, blood cholesterol (\>240 mg/dL), and diabetes.

You may not qualify if:

  • \) severe impairment of left ventricular function (ejection fraction \< 40 %). 2) renal failure requiring hemodialysis. 3) known allergies to the drugs used in the present study. 4) contraindications to regional blocks (localized infection, and use of an antiplatelet drug within 3 days before the surgery). 5) unusual blood coagulation tests.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Alexandria University Faculty of Medicin

Alexandria, 21615, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Interventions

Anesthesia, GeneralAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnesthesia, Spinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnesthesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaAnalgesiaAnesthesia, Conduction

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of two anaesthesia methods in preventing perioperative myocardial infarction in patients with cardiac risk undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome included perioperative levels of brain natriuretic peptide \& cardiac troponins. Secondary outcomes included postoperative operative pain assessment using visual analogue scale, total amount of analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction \& cardiovascular complications (myocardial infarction, arrhythmias , heart failure, hypotension, hypertension \& the need for inotropic agents ).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2022

First Posted

April 22, 2022

Study Start

September 5, 2021

Primary Completion

March 5, 2022

Study Completion

April 15, 2022

Last Updated

April 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations