Prospective Study of Video-assisted Rib Planting in Chest Wall Stabilization
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the advantages and disadvantages of video-assisted rib planting and traditional internal fixation of rib fractures in chest wall stabilization. The investigators design a new surgical method of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for rib fractures, evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the new surgical techniques with a prospective study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2022
CompletedApril 22, 2022
April 1, 2022
2 months
February 14, 2022
April 15, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The pain score after operation
The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS),which is used to evaluate pain scores 6h,12h,and 24h after the operation. 0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.
6 hours after operation
The pain score after operation
The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS). 0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.
12 hours after operation
The pain score after operation
The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS). 0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.
24 hours after operation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The postoperative drainage
7 days at most
Other Outcomes (5)
The operation time
During surgery
The length of incision
During surgery
The intraoperative bleeding
During surgery
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
video-assisted rib planting
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Give the patient intercostal nerve block and laryngeal mask anesthesia, after that, put the patient in lateral position. Make a 4-6cm posterolateral incision along the lower edge of the scapula,sever latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior and reach the rib surface. Lift the scapula with the abdominal retractor (or xiphoid retractor), Free adhesion tissue inside the scapula and put in the thoracoscopic lens. Free the tissue of the upper and lower edges of the ribs carefully, reset ribs and insert rib plate, which is fixed by 90° electric drill and locking screw.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥3 unilateral rib displacement fractures
- years old
- ASA score I-II
- Preoperative arterial oxygen partial pressure \>60mmHg
- Carbon dioxide partial pressure \<50mmHg
You may not qualify if:
- The distance from the broken end of the posterior rib fracture to the spine is less than 2cm
- Airway stenosis
- Abnormal coagulation system
- History of peptic ulcer or bleeding
- History of allergy to anesthesia related drugs
- History of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Weigang Zhaolead
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
Shanghai, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Weigang Zhao
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2022
First Posted
April 22, 2022
Study Start
February 22, 2021
Primary Completion
April 30, 2021
Study Completion
January 6, 2022
Last Updated
April 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04