Effect of Different Approaches of Delivering Local Dental Anesthesia on Pain Perception in Children.
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of three different approaches of local anesthesia (LA) administration (Warm\[37°C\] LA, Buffered LA, and BUZZY device) on pain perception to young children ( 6-12 years old) using sound -eye -motor and Wong-Baker FPR scales.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started May 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedApril 29, 2022
April 1, 2022
1 year
April 14, 2022
April 25, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain Behavoir
The pain will be analyzed by sound ,eye motor scale An assistant will be trained to measure and calibrate the SEM scale. The assistant will be blinded to the study group to avoid bias.
During the anesthetic procedure
Self-perception of pain
The pain will be analyzed by the Wong Baker Faces scales . A set of six cartoon faces will be shown to the child with varying facial expressions ranging from a very smiling face to a very sad face. A brief explanation will be given to the child about each face after which the child will be instructed to choose the face that will describe his/ her feelings while receiving local anesthesia
Immediately after anesthesia
Study Arms (4)
Control: Traditional local anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter proper isolation and drying of the injection site, the topical anesthetic gel (20% benzocaine) will be applied to the injection site using sterile cotton tipped applicator for 60 seconds, then the anesthesia (2% mepivacaine hcl with 1:100000 epinephrine) will be administere
Group A (Warm group)
EXPERIMENTALThe topical anesthetic gel (20% benzocaine) will be applied to the injection site using sterile cotton tipped applicator for 60 seconds. The cartridge of anesthetic solution will be placed in the baby bottle warmer in 300 ml of cold water (21°C). The anesthetic fluid will be warmed to reach 37°C (98.6°F) ,then the local anesthesia((2% mepivacaine hcl with 1:100000 epinephrine) will be administered
Group B (Buffered group)
EXPERIMENTALThe topical anesthetic gel (20% benzocaine) will be applied to the injection site for 60 seconds,0.1ml of 8.4% of sodium bicarbonate will be removed from the 50 ml vial by one ml insulin syringe and directly injected into the local anesthetic cartridge. The cartridge will be shacked 5 times to mix the solution, then the local anesthesia(2% mepivacaine hcl with 1:100000 epinephrine) will be administered.
Group C (Buzzy group)
EXPERIMENTALAfter the child setting on the dental chair,(20% benzocaine) topical anesthetic gel will be applied to the injection site for 60 seconds. He will be familiar with the Buzzy device by explaining how it works in simple words. The wings of the device will be kept in the freezer. Once the child is ready, the frozen wings will be attached to the device and Buzzy will be placed extra-orally above the area/cheek where local anesthetic will be delivered. Once Buzzy is being held in place by hand, press the button or switch on the top of Buzzy, then the anesthesia (2% mepivacaine hcl with 1:100000 epinephrine) will be administered.
Interventions
20% Benzocaine gel will be applied on the area of infiltration
0.1ml of 8.4% of sodium bicarbonate will be removed from the 50ml vial by one ml insulin syringe , directly injected into the local anesthetic cartridge and will be shacked 5 times to mix the solution.
Bee-shaped apparatus consisting of two parts: the main vibrating body of a bee and detachable ice wings. External application of Buzzy device during administration of dental anesthetic.
Mepivacaine HCL 2% with Epinephrine 1:100,000 Local Anesthetic. Local Dental anesthetic infiltration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children requiring maxillary infiltration LA for dental treatment.
- Cooperative children (positive or definitely positive on Frankel's scale).
- Children are in apparently good health and not taking any medications that will alter their pain perception.
- Children have no history of allergy to Mepivacaine
You may not qualify if:
- The person responsible does not authorize the participation of the child as a research volunteer.
- Be using pain modulating drugs.
- Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to local anesthetics.
- Patients with a history of systemic diseases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry
Al Mansurah, 35511, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Leff DR, Nortley M, Dang V, Bhutiani RP. The effect of local cooling on pain perception during infiltration of local anaesthetic agents, a prospective randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2007 Jul;62(7):677-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05056.x.
PMID: 17567343BACKGROUNDRoeber B, Wallace DP, Rothe V, Salama F, Allen KD. Evaluation of the effects of the VibraJect attachment on pain in children receiving local anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2011 Jan-Feb;33(1):46-50.
PMID: 21406147BACKGROUNDRam D, Hermida LB, Peretz B. A comparison of warmed and room-temperature anesthetic for local anesthesia in children. Pediatr Dent. 2002 Jul-Aug;24(4):333-6.
PMID: 12212876BACKGROUNDAravena PC, Barrientos C, Troncoso C, Coronado C, Sotelo-Hitschfeld P. Effect of warming anesthetic on pain perception during dental injection: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Local Reg Anesth. 2018 Feb 22;11:9-13. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S147288. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29503582BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sahar H Zidan
Dentist at Ministry of Health B.D.S (2013), Diploma (2016)
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nadia M Farrag
Professor of Pediatric Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ahmed H Wahba
Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The observer and the recipients will be blinded to the study group to avoid bias (double blind randomized controlled trial)
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2022
First Posted
April 21, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
April 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04