Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU2)
INSPiRE-ICU2
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Assessor-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU2)
1 other identifier
interventional
282
1 country
16
Brief Summary
This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S device system versus intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jun 2022
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 14, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 3, 2026
CompletedMarch 24, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.9 years
April 5, 2022
May 21, 2025
March 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Time Sedation Depth is Maintained Within the Target Range, in Absence of Rescue Sedation, as Assessed According to the RASS Scale, in Isoflurane- vs Propofol-treated Patients
The Target Range is RASS -1 to -4. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is used to measure the level of agitation or sedation in patients, particularly in critical care settings. It is a 10-point scale ranging from -5 to +4: +4 Combative - Violent, immediate danger to staff. +3 Very agitated - Pulls or removes tubes or catheters; aggressive. +2 Agitated - Frequent non-purposeful movement, fights ventilator. +1 Restless - Anxious but movements are not aggressive. 0 Alert and calm. -1 Drowsy - Not fully alert, but has sustained awakening (eye-opening/eye contact) to voice for more than 10 seconds. -2 Light sedation - Briefly awakens with eye contact to voice for less than 10 seconds. -3 Moderate sedation - Movement or eye opening to voice, but no eye contact. -4 Deep sedation - No response to voice, but movement or eye opening to physical stimulation. -5 Unarousable - No response to voice or physical stimulation.
From start to end of study treatment (up to 48 (±6) hours)
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Use of Opioids During the Study Treatment Period
From 60 minutes prior to Baseline until end of study treatment (60 minutes + up to 48 (±6) hours)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on the Wake up Time at End of Study Drug Treatment
Up to 4 hours after stop of study drug treatment (up to 54 (±6) hours)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Cognitive Recovery After End of Study Drug Treatment
At 60 minutes (±10 minutes) after end of study drug treatment (up to 49 (±6) hours)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Spontaneous Breathing Effort During the Study Drug Treatment Period
From start to end of study treatment, up to 48 (±6) hours
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Time From Sedation Termination to Extubation in Patients for Whom Study Drug is Terminated for Extubation
From end of study drug treatment to extubation (up to 7 Days after randomization)
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Isoflurane
EXPERIMENTALInhaled isoflurane administered via Sedaconda ACD-S
Propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropofol administered as intravenous infusion
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults ≥18 years of age;
- Patients who are anticipated to require \>12 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation in the ICU; and
- Receipt of continuous sedation due to clinical need for sedation to RASS \<0.
You may not qualify if:
- Need for RASS -5;
- Sedation for invasive mechanical ventilation immediately prior to Baseline for \>72 hours;
- Severe neurological condition before ICU admission that causes the patient to lack ability to participate in the study (ie, unable to be assessed for RASS and CPOT);
- Ventilator tidal volume \<200 or \>1000 mL at Baseline;
- Need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R), high frequency oscillation ventilation (HFOV), or high frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) at Screening;
- Comfort care only (end of life care);
- Contraindication to propofol or isoflurane;
- Known or family history of MH;
- Severe hemodynamic compromise, defined as the need for norepinephrine ≥0.3 mcg/kg/min (or equivalent vasopressor dose) to maintain blood pressure within acceptable range, assumed to be mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg unless prescribed clinically;
- Allergy to isoflurane or propofol, or have propofol infusion syndrome.
- History of ventricular tachycardia/Long QT Syndrome;
- Requirement of IV benzodiazepine or barbiturate administration for seizures or dependencies, including alcohol withdrawal
- Neuromuscular disease that impairs spontaneous ventilation (eg, C5 or higher spinal cord injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc);
- Concurrent enrollment in another study that, in the Investigator's opinion, would impact the patient's safety or assessments of this study;
- Participation in other study involving investigational drug(s) or devices(s) within 30 days prior to Randomization;
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sedana Medicallead
Study Sites (16)
Memorial Health Services
Long Beach, California, 90807, United States
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Stanford University
Redwood City, California, 94063, United States
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92023, United States
University of Miami
Coral Gables, Florida, 33146, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
The Cooper Health System
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Memorial Hermann Health Services
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23284, United States
Related Publications (16)
Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
PMID: 30113379BACKGROUNDShehabi Y, Howe BD, Bellomo R, Arabi YM, Bailey M, Bass FE, Bin Kadiman S, McArthur CJ, Murray L, Reade MC, Seppelt IM, Takala J, Wise MP, Webb SA; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group and the SPICE III Investigators. Early Sedation with Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2506-2517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904710. Epub 2019 May 19.
PMID: 31112380BACKGROUNDKress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.
PMID: 10816184BACKGROUNDMehta S, Burry L, Cook D, Fergusson D, Steinberg M, Granton J, Herridge M, Ferguson N, Devlin J, Tanios M, Dodek P, Fowler R, Burns K, Jacka M, Olafson K, Skrobik Y, Hebert P, Sabri E, Meade M; SLEAP Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients cared for with a sedation protocol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012 Nov 21;308(19):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13872.
PMID: 23180503BACKGROUNDSackey PV, Martling CR, Carlsward C, Sundin O, Radell PJ. Short- and long-term follow-up of intensive care unit patients after sedation with isoflurane and midazolam--a pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):801-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181652FEE.
PMID: 18431266BACKGROUNDMesnil M, Capdevila X, Bringuier S, Trine PO, Falquet Y, Charbit J, Roustan JP, Chanques G, Jaber S. Long-term sedation in intensive care unit: a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jun;37(6):933-41. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2187-3. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
PMID: 21445642BACKGROUNDMeiser A, Volk T, Wallenborn J, Guenther U, Becher T, Bracht H, Schwarzkopf K, Knafelj R, Faltlhauser A, Thal SC, Soukup J, Kellner P, Druner M, Vogelsang H, Bellgardt M, Sackey P; Sedaconda study group. Inhaled isoflurane via the anaesthetic conserving device versus propofol for sedation of invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units in Germany and Slovenia: an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Nov;9(11):1231-1240. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00323-4. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
PMID: 34454654BACKGROUNDKong KL, Willatts SM, Prys-Roberts C. Isoflurane compared with midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit. BMJ. 1989 May 13;298(6683):1277-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6683.1277.
PMID: 2500195BACKGROUNDChanques G, Constantin JM, Devlin JW, Ely EW, Fraser GL, Gelinas C, Girard TD, Guerin C, Jabaudon M, Jaber S, Mehta S, Langer T, Murray MJ, Pandharipande P, Patel B, Payen JF, Puntillo K, Rochwerg B, Shehabi Y, Strom T, Olsen HT, Kress JP. Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2342-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06307-9. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
PMID: 33170331BACKGROUNDJerath A, Ferguson ND, Cuthbertson B. Inhalational volatile-based sedation for COVID-19 pneumonia and ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1563-1566. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06154-8. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
PMID: 32588067BACKGROUNDBellgardt M, Bomberg H, Herzog-Niescery J, Dasch B, Vogelsang H, Weber TP, Steinfort C, Uhl W, Wagenpfeil S, Volk T, Meiser A. Survival after long-term isoflurane sedation as opposed to intravenous sedation in critically ill surgical patients: Retrospective analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jan;33(1):6-13. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000252.
PMID: 25793760BACKGROUNDHughes CG, Mailloux PT, Devlin JW, Swan JT, Sanders RD, Anzueto A, Jackson JC, Hoskins AS, Pun BT, Orun OM, Raman R, Stollings JL, Kiehl AL, Duprey MS, Bui LN, O'Neal HR Jr, Snyder A, Gropper MA, Guntupalli KK, Stashenko GJ, Patel MB, Brummel NE, Girard TD, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW, Pandharipande PP; MENDS2 Study Investigators. Dexmedetomidine or Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1424-1436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024922. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
PMID: 33528922BACKGROUNDKrannich A, Leithner C, Engels M, Nee J, Petzinka V, Schroder T, Jorres A, Kruse J, Storm C. Isoflurane Sedation on the ICU in Cardiac Arrest Patients Treated With Targeted Temperature Management: An Observational Propensity-Matched Study. Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e384-e390. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002185.
PMID: 27941501BACKGROUNDGirard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, Thomason JW, Schweickert WD, Pun BT, Taichman DB, Dunn JG, Pohlman AS, Kinniry PA, Jackson JC, Canonico AE, Light RW, Shintani AK, Thompson JL, Gordon SM, Hall JB, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):126-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60105-1.
PMID: 18191684BACKGROUNDPandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, Morandi A, Thompson JL, Pun BT, Brummel NE, Hughes CG, Vasilevskis EE, Shintani AK, Moons KG, Geevarghese SK, Canonico A, Hopkins RO, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, Ely EW; BRAIN-ICU Study Investigators. Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1306-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301372.
PMID: 24088092BACKGROUNDO'Gara B, Serra AL, Englert JA, Sachdev A, Owens RL, Chang SY, Park PK, Talmor D, Sverud I, Sackey P, Beitler JR. Inhaled sedation versus propofol in respiratory failure in the ICU (INSPiRE-ICU2): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Mar 31;26(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08791-0.
PMID: 40165305DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director Clinical Development and Operations
- Organization
- Sedana Medical
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeremy Beitler, M.D.
Columbia University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2022
First Posted
April 14, 2022
Study Start
June 30, 2022
Primary Completion
May 28, 2024
Study Completion
November 14, 2024
Last Updated
March 24, 2026
Results First Posted
March 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03