Sedana Medical
6
1
2
3
Key Highlights
Risk & Performance
Pipeline Risk Assessment
Pipeline Risk Assessment
Based on historical performance
Low Risk
Score: 5/100
0.0%
0 terminated/withdrawn out of 6 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs industry average
67%
4 trials in Phase 3/4
100%
3 of 3 completed trials have results
Key Signals
Enrollment Performance
Analytics
Activity Timeline
Global Presence
Clinical Trials (6)
Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU1)
Role: lead
Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU2)
Role: lead
Expanded Access for Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S for Sedation of Difficult-to-Sedate Adult Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients
Role: lead
Effect & Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane vs IV Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children 3-17 Years Old
Role: lead
A Pooled Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes After Inhaled Isoflurane Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol
Role: lead
Volatile Sedation for Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Role: collaborator
All 6 trials loaded