Comparison of Infiltration of 2% Lidocaine With and Without Needle as Analgesia in Epidural Needle Insertion
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
One way to reduce pain during epidural needle insertion is infiltration of lidocaine using a needle. However, infiltration of lidocaine using the needle alone is a painful process. Free needle infiltration of lidocaine can be an alternative to reduce epidural needle insertion pain. The study of Gozdemir et al. found that 10% lidocaine infiltration without needle was less painful than 2% lidocaine infiltration with a 27G needle with no significant difference in analgesia effect during epidural needle insertion. This study aimed to compare infiltration of lidocaine with and without needle for epidural needle insertion in a double-blind study, using a Tuohy needle, Comfort-inTM injector, and wider surgical group as novelty from previous studies. This study was a double blind randomized controlled trial. Data collection was carried out consecutively on 84 subjects with 42 subjects in each group of lidocaine infiltration without needles and lidocaine infiltration with 23G needles. The effectiveness of analgesia was assessed from three variables like pain with a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) of 0 to 10 during lidocaine infiltration, pain with NPRS during epidural needle insertion, and patient movement during epidural needle insertion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2022
CompletedApril 27, 2022
April 1, 2022
2 months
March 28, 2022
April 20, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Pain Scale (NPRS scale) when Lidocaine Infiltrated
The pain measurement with NPRS scale when 2% Lidocaine infiltrated
Immediately after Lidocaine is infiltrated
Pain Scale (NPRS scale) when Epidural Needle Inserted
The pain measurement with NPRS scale when Epidural Needle Inserted
Immediately after Epidural Needle Inserted
Patient's Movement when Lidocaine Infiltrated
Observation of patient's movement when 2% Lidocaine infiltrated
Immediately after Lidocaine is infiltrated
Patient's Movement when Epidural Needle Inserted
Observation of patient's movement when Epidural Needle Inserted
Immediately after Epidural Needle Inserted
Study Arms (2)
Infiltration of 2% Lidocaine with Needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORFree needle infiltration of lidocaine can be an alternative to reduce epidural needle insertion pain. The study of Gozdemir et al. found that 10% lidocaine infiltration without needle was less painful than 2% lidocaine infiltration with a 27G needle with no significant difference in analgesia effect during epidural needle insertion. This study aimed to compare infiltration of lidocaine with and without needle for epidural needle insertion
Infiltration of 2% Lidocaine without Needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORFree needle infiltration of lidocaine can be an alternative to reduce epidural needle insertion pain. The study of Gozdemir et al. found that 10% lidocaine infiltration without needle was less painful than 2% lidocaine infiltration with a 27G needle with no significant difference in analgesia effect during epidural needle insertion. This study aimed to compare infiltration of lidocaine with and without needle for epidural needle insertion
Interventions
Infiltration of 2% Lidocaine with Needle
Free needle infiltration of lidocaine can be an alternative to reduce epidural needle insertion pain. The study of Gozdemir et al. found that 10% lidocaine infiltration without needle was less painful than 2% lidocaine infiltration with a 27G needle with no significant difference in analgesia effect during epidural needle insertion. This study aimed to compare infiltration of lidocaine with and without needle for epidural needle insertion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective surgery patients undergoing epidural anesthesia (from thoracic 11 to lumbar 5) at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
- Patients aged 19 to 65 years
- Patients with American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) criteria 1 to 3
- Willing to participate and signing the agreement
You may not qualify if:
- Epidural anesthesia with combined spinal epidural needle (Espocan)
- Epidural anesthesia is contraindicated
- Patients with a history of local anesthetic allergy
- The patient who cannot sit or feels pain when in a sitting position
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo
Jakarta, 01430, Indonesia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Raden B Sukmono
Indonesia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants, care providers, and investigators are blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2022
First Posted
April 14, 2022
Study Start
November 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
April 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share