Ultrasound Guided : Retrolaminar Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block vs ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia in pain control following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedJanuary 27, 2022
January 1, 2022
7 months
April 4, 2021
January 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
30 minutes postoperative
Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
at 1 hour postoperative
Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
at 2 hours postoperative
Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
at 4 hours postoperative
Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
at 6 hours postoperative
Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
at 8 hours postoperative
Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
at 10 hours postoperative
Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
at 12 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Time to first call of rescue analgesia
within 12 hours postoperative
Total analgesic (Naluphine) consumption
within 12 hours postoperative
The number of participant with complications of the techinque (dural puncture , nerve injury, spinal injection, epidural haematoma, pleural puncture)
within 24 hours postoperative
Patient satisfaction is recorded at the end of 24 hours postoperative
24 hours postoperative
The number of participant with nausea, vomiting, hypotension and bradycardia.
24 hours postoperative
Study Arms (2)
group T
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup (T) (n=26): will receive ultrasound guided thoracic epidural analgesia: 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000).
group R
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup (R) (n=26): will receive bilateral ultrasound guided retrolaminar block analgesia: 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000).
Interventions
in lateral position and after skin sterilization. The spine is palpated from cervical (C7) downward toT7 and point marked to identify the spinous process. The linear high frequency transducer (6-13 MHz) will be placed parasagittal plane 1 cm lateral to the midline. The needle (18 gauge) is inserted in the plane view of the ultrasound probe to target the T7 and needle is advanced from downward to upward until the needle tip contacted the lamina. After negative aspiration, a 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000) will be injected. The procedure will be repeated following the same steps on the other side.
In the lateral position, after skin sterilization, Ultrasound with high frequency linear probe (5-13 MHz). Thoracic intervertebral space (T7-8) will be identified by counting from the C7 to prominent thoracic spine (T7). The probe will be used in parasagittal plane 2 cm from midline. The probe will be directed medially to identify the dura matter at the T7-8 intervertebral space . the needle 18 gauage will be inserted in plane to target T7-8 intervertebral space ., after needle tip reached target space, loss of resistance technique then 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000) was injected after aspiration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent from the patient.
- Age: 21-45 years old.
- Sex: both sex (males and females).
- Physical status: ASA 1\& II.
- BMI = (25-35 kg/m2).
- Type of operation: elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Altered mental state.
- Patients with known history of allergy to study drugs.
- Advanced hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, and respiratory diseases.
- Patients with chronic pain.
- Patients receiving anticoagulants.
- Contraindications of regional anesthesia, e.g., allergy to local anesthetics, coagulopathy, or septic focus at site of injection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
faculty of medicine, Zagazig university
Zagazig, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dina Salem, MD.
faculty of medicine , Zagazig University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double (participant, outcomes assessor) Anesthetist not sharing in the study will assess patient.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2021
First Posted
April 8, 2021
Study Start
April 10, 2021
Primary Completion
November 15, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
January 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share