NCT04835415

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block vs ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia in pain control following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2021

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 10, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 15, 2021

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 27, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 4, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 11, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

UltrasoundBilateral retrolaminarThoracic epiduralpost operative analgesiaLaparoscopic cholecystectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)

    measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)

    30 minutes postoperative

  • Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)

    measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)

    at 1 hour postoperative

  • Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)

    measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)

    at 2 hours postoperative

  • Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)

    measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)

    at 4 hours postoperative

  • Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)

    measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)

    at 6 hours postoperative

  • Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)

    measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)

    at 8 hours postoperative

  • Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)

    measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)

    at 10 hours postoperative

  • Pain intensity at rest and at cough using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS)

    measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)

    at 12 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Time to first call of rescue analgesia

    within 12 hours postoperative

  • Total analgesic (Naluphine) consumption

    within 12 hours postoperative

  • The number of participant with complications of the techinque (dural puncture , nerve injury, spinal injection, epidural haematoma, pleural puncture)

    within 24 hours postoperative

  • Patient satisfaction is recorded at the end of 24 hours postoperative

    24 hours postoperative

  • The number of participant with nausea, vomiting, hypotension and bradycardia.

    24 hours postoperative

Study Arms (2)

group T

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group (T) (n=26): will receive ultrasound guided thoracic epidural analgesia: 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000).

Procedure: Thoracic epidural analgesia

group R

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group (R) (n=26): will receive bilateral ultrasound guided retrolaminar block analgesia: 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000).

Procedure: Bilateral retrolaminar block

Interventions

in lateral position and after skin sterilization. The spine is palpated from cervical (C7) downward toT7 and point marked to identify the spinous process. The linear high frequency transducer (6-13 MHz) will be placed parasagittal plane 1 cm lateral to the midline. The needle (18 gauge) is inserted in the plane view of the ultrasound probe to target the T7 and needle is advanced from downward to upward until the needle tip contacted the lamina. After negative aspiration, a 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000) will be injected. The procedure will be repeated following the same steps on the other side.

Also known as: Ultrasound guided retrolaminar block
group R

In the lateral position, after skin sterilization, Ultrasound with high frequency linear probe (5-13 MHz). Thoracic intervertebral space (T7-8) will be identified by counting from the C7 to prominent thoracic spine (T7). The probe will be used in parasagittal plane 2 cm from midline. The probe will be directed medially to identify the dura matter at the T7-8 intervertebral space . the needle 18 gauage will be inserted in plane to target T7-8 intervertebral space ., after needle tip reached target space, loss of resistance technique then 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000) was injected after aspiration

Also known as: Ultrasound guided thoracic epidural
group T

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent from the patient.
  • Age: 21-45 years old.
  • Sex: both sex (males and females).
  • Physical status: ASA 1\& II.
  • BMI = (25-35 kg/m2).
  • Type of operation: elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

You may not qualify if:

  • Altered mental state.
  • Patients with known history of allergy to study drugs.
  • Advanced hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, and respiratory diseases.
  • Patients with chronic pain.
  • Patients receiving anticoagulants.
  • Contraindications of regional anesthesia, e.g., allergy to local anesthetics, coagulopathy, or septic focus at site of injection.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

faculty of medicine, Zagazig university

Zagazig, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Interventions

Tea

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Plant PreparationsBiological ProductsComplex MixturesBeveragesDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological PhenomenaFood and Beverages

Study Officials

  • Dina Salem, MD.

    faculty of medicine , Zagazig University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double (participant, outcomes assessor) Anesthetist not sharing in the study will assess patient.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Analgesia for postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block vs ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2021

First Posted

April 8, 2021

Study Start

April 10, 2021

Primary Completion

November 15, 2021

Study Completion

December 1, 2021

Last Updated

January 27, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations