The Effect of Motivational Interview Attempt on Self-Efficacy Level and Decision to Quit Smoking of University Students

NCT05324644 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 1071
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 64
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study aimed to determine the effect of motivational interview initiatives on the smoking cessation decisions of university students. In this study, which will be conducted as a randomized, case-control study; Student introduction form, Fagerström Nicotine Addiction Test, Decision-Making Balance Scale, Self-efficacy adequacy scale, Behavior Change Stage Diagnosis Short Questionnaire, Beck Depression Scale, Smoking Desire Scale will be used, CO will be measured. Motivational interview initiative will be applied to first-year students who are enrolled in the university, who smoke and are considering quitting. The estimated duration of the study is 8-10 months. Maximum number of volunteers will be 60.

Conditions

Codependency, Psychological

Keywords

motivational interview, quit smoking, behavior change

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Number of people who quit smoking

  The number of people who quit smoking in the groups at the end of the study.

  Six months

Other Outcomes (6)

• Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence

  Six months

• Decision Making Balance Scale

  Six months

• Self-efficacy adequacy scale

  Six months

Study Arms (2)

Interventional group

EXPERIMENTAL

32 randomly selected first-year students in the university, who voluntarily agreed to be recruited into the study and smoke and are considering quitting.

Behavioral: Motivational interview

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

32 randomly selected first-year students in the university, who voluntarily agreed to be recruited into the study and smoke and are considering quitting.

Interventions

Motivational interview BEHAVIORAL

In the first interviews with the students; It is planned to provide information about acquaintance and research, fill in the scales in 10-15 minutes, make CO measurements, and also conduct an average of 20-40 minutes of motivational interviews in the intervention group. In the second interview in the 1st month, it is planned to summarize the first interview, fill in the scales in 3-5 minutes, make the CO measurements in 10-15 minutes or get the measurement results and apply motivational interview in the average of 20-40 minutes. In the third interview in the 3rd month, it is planned to summarize the second interview in 3-5 min, fill in the scales in 10-15 minutes, make CO measurements or get the measurement results and to apply motivational interviews for an average of 20-40 minutes. In the last interview in the 6th month, it is planned to summarize the 3rd-month interview, to apply the scales for approximately 10-15 minutes, to make CO measurements or to get the measurement results.

Interventional group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Students in Year 1
• Smoker,
• years and older,
• Those who have not received a psychiatric diagnosis made by the physician,
• Those who want to quit smoking,
• Volunteer students who accept the motivational interview.

You may not qualify if:

• Non-smokers,
• years old and under,
• Taking the course of the researcher teacher due to vulnerability,
• Students who do not want to participate voluntarily will not be included.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Izmir Katip Celebi University: lead
• Green Crescent (Yeşilay): collaborator

Study Sites (1)

İzmir Katip Çelebi University

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (27)

• Akdur, R. Gençlerde Sigara Salgını (2010). Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Halk Sağlığı Yayınları. Ankara

  BACKGROUND

• Apodaca TR, Abrantes AM, Strong DR, Ramsey SE, Brown RA. Readiness to change smoking behavior in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. Addict Behav. 2007 Jun;32(6):1119-30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.07.016. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

  PMID: 16950572 BACKGROUND

• Demirezen M, Kurcer MA. Questionnaire of smoking urges Turkish validity and reliability. TAF Prev Med Bull 2016;15:1-4.

  BACKGROUND

• DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Fairhurst SK, Velicer WF, Velasquez MM, Rossi JS. The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):295-304. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.2.295.

  PMID: 2030191 BACKGROUND

• Doğan, DG,. Ulukol, B. (2010). Ergenlerin sigara içmesini etkileyen faktörler ve sigara karşıtı iki eğitim modelinin etkinliği. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.79-85.

  BACKGROUND

• Edwards, L.K. (1993). Applied Analysis of Variance in the Behavior Sciences. Marcel Dekker. New York.

  BACKGROUND

• 2008 PHS Guideline Update Panel, Liaisons, and Staff. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update U.S. Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline executive summary. Respir Care. 2008 Sep;53(9):1217-22. No abstract available.

  PMID: 18807274 BACKGROUND

• Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav. 1980 Sep;21(3):219-39. No abstract available.

  PMID: 7410799 BACKGROUND

• Gözüm S, Aksayan S. (1999). Öz-etkililik-yeterlik ölçeği'nin türkçe formunun güvenilirlik ve geçerliliği. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences;2(1):21-34.

  BACKGROUND

• Health New Zeland. (2009). Testing for Carbon Monoxide in exhaled breath. (2020). Erişim adresi: http://www.healthnz.co.nz/CObreath.htm.

  BACKGROUND

• Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x.

  PMID: 1932883 BACKGROUND

• Hisli, N. (1989). Beck depresyon envanterinin üniversite öğrencileri için geçerliği, güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(23), 3-13.

  BACKGROUND

• Kamışlı Özcan, S. (2007). Psikoeğitimsel Bir Programla Hemşirelerin Sigara Bırakma Durumları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi. Ankara.

  BACKGROUND

• Karadağlı, F., Nahcivan, N. (2012). Sigara içen bireylerde sigara bırakmaya hazıroluşluk durumu ile ilişkili faktörler. DEUHYO Dergisi, 5(1), (s. 8- 15).

  BACKGROUND

• Karagöz Y. SPSS 21.1 (2014). Uygulamalı Biyoistatistik. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; .s.1-740.

  BACKGROUND

• Kaya N, Çilli AS. (2002). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Nikotin, Alkol ve Madde Bağımlılığının On iki Aylık Yaygınlığı, Bağımlılık Dergisi 3(2).

  BACKGROUND

• Kisioğlu N, Öztürk M, Doğan M. (2002). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İlk ve Son Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Sigaraya Yönelik Bilgi, Tutum, Davranışları ve Sigaraya Başlama ve Alışma Durumları.

  BACKGROUND

• Lancaster T, Stead L, Silagy C, Sowden A. Effectiveness of interventions to help people stop smoking: findings from the Cochrane Library. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):355-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.355. No abstract available.

  PMID: 10926597 BACKGROUND

• Mueller, K. E., and Barton, C. N. (1989). 'Approximate Power for Repeated-Measures ANOVA Lacking Sphericity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Volume 84, No. 406, pages 549-555.

  BACKGROUND

• Muller KE, Lavange LM, Ramey SL, Ramey CT. Power Calculations for General Linear Multivariate Models Including Repeated Measures Applications. J Am Stat Assoc. 1992 Dec 1;87(420):1209-1226. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1992.10476281.

  PMID: 24790282 BACKGROUND

• Ögel K. (2009). Motivasyonel görüşme tekniği. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Psychiatry-Special Topics 2009;2(2):41-44.

  BACKGROUND

• Onur ST, Uysal MA, Iliaz S, Yurt S, Bahadir A, Hattatoglu DG, Ortakoylu MG, Bagci BA, Chousein EG. Does Short Message Service Increase Adherence to Smoking Cessation Clinic Appointments and Quitting Smoking? Balkan Med J. 2016 Sep;33(5):525-531. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.151610. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

  PMID: 27761280 BACKGROUND

• Özdemir H, Taşcı S. (2013). Motivasyonel görüşme tekniği ve hemşirelikte kullanımı. ERÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi;1(1):41-47.

  BACKGROUND

• Pardavila-Belio MI, Garcia-Vivar C, Pimenta AM, Canga-Armayor A, Pueyo-Garrigues S, Canga-Armayor N. Intervention study for smoking cessation in Spanish college students: pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2015 Oct;110(10):1676-83. doi: 10.1111/add.13009. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

  PMID: 26053958 BACKGROUND

• Prochazka AV. New developments in smoking cessation. Chest. 2000 Apr;117(4 Suppl 1):169S-175S. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.4_suppl_1.169s.

  PMID: 10777474 BACKGROUND

• Uysal MA, Kadakal F, Karsidag C, Bayram NG, Uysal O, Yilmaz V. Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: reliability in a Turkish sample and factor analysis. Tuberk Toraks. 2004;52(2):115-21.

  PMID: 15241694 BACKGROUND

• Yalcinkaya-Alkar O, Karanci AN. What are the differences in decisional balance and self-efficacy between Turkish smokers in different stages of change? Addict Behav. 2007 Apr;32(4):836-49. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.023. Epub 2006 Jul 13.

  PMID: 16842929 BACKGROUND

Related Links

• Green crescent

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Codependency, Psychological

Interventions

Motivational Interviewing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Directive Counseling; Counseling; Mental Health Services; Behavioral Disciplines and Activities; Health Services; Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: FACTORIAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Lecturer

Model Details: This study is a randomized and case-control study.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 6, 2022
• First Posted: April 12, 2022
• Study Start: April 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: November 30, 2021
• Study Completion: December 31, 2021
• Last Updated: April 12, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)