The Nociceptive Flexion Reflex as a Diagnostic Tool of Central Sensitization

NCT05321550 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: BC-5159
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 240
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This experimental study will investigate whether the decreased NFR threshold and increased NFR temporal summation, which are frequently observed in chronic pain patients, are only symptomatic manifestations that occur in the involved limb and indicate peripheral sensitization or generalized manifestations that are also present in the non-involved limbs and thus indicate central sensitization. To gain an idea of the presence of central sensitization, this study will also investigate whether there are increased perception and decreased pain thresholds in response to electrical, thermal, and mechanical stimulation, as well as whether there is a decreased conditioned pain modulation. To investigate this, it is essential to examine different pain populations and locations, in particular, acute pain versus chronic pain populations to compare peripheral versus central sensitization, respectively. Recently, our research group has shown that patients with a traumatic origin of chronic neck pain (chronic whiplash-associated disorders) show central sensitization in contrast to patients with a non-traumatic origin (chronic idiopathic neck pain) who demonstrate only indications for peripheral sensitization. Therefore, this study will also distinguish between complaints of traumatic and non-traumatic origin. The measurements will be performed at different locations, namely the lower and upper limbs. To determine whether the differences depend on the measurement location (= location where experimental nociceptive stimulation is administered) and symptom location (= location of clinical nociceptive stimulation), different patient populations will be compared with each other, as well as with a healthy control population. In acute and chronic whiplash patients and patients with acute and chronic idiopathic neck pain complaints, the complaints are primarily localized in the upper limb. It is hypothesized that in chronic neck pain patients (both whiplash and idiopathic neck pain patients) abnormal values are found in both the upper and lower limbs compared to the healthy controls due to central sensitization. In acute neck pain patients (both whiplash and idiopathic neck pain) only abnormal values in the arm are expected and not in the leg as a result of peripheral sensitization. It is hypothesized that patients with neck pain of traumatic origin will show a stronger sensitization than those with neck pain of non-traumatic origin. In acute and chronic low back pain patients, the complaints are primarily localized in the lower body quadrant. As a result of central sensitization in the chronic low back pain patients, abnormal values are expected in both the upper and lower limbs, while only abnormal values in the leg are expected as a result of peripheral sensitization in the acute low back pain patients. Finally, this study will investigate whether chronic low back and neck pain patients show a similar pattern of central sensitization as fibromyalgia patients, a population with generalized complaints that are primarily attributed to central sensitization.

Conditions

Central Sensitisation; Fibromyalgia; Neck Pain; Low Back Pain; Whiplash

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - electrical detection threshold

  Determination of sensory detection thresholds in response to electrical stimuli which are delivered transcutaneously over the n. suralis and n. medianus, recorded in mA.

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - electrical pain threshold

  Determination of sensory pain threshold in response to electrical stimuli which are delivered transcutaneously over the n. suralis and n. medianus, recorded in mA.

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - thermal detection threshold

  Determination of sensory detection thresholds in response to thermal stimuli which are delivered to the skin using a thermode, recorded in °C: * cold detection threshold * warmth detection threshold

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - thermal pain threshold

  Determination of sensory pain thresholds in response to thermal stimuli which are delivered to the skin using a thermode, recorded in °C: * cold pain threshold * heat pain threshold

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - discrimination between thermal stimuli

  Determination of the number of paradoxical heat sensations in response to alternating cold and warm stimuli delivered to the skin using a thermode.

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - tactile detection threshold

  Determination of tactile detection threshold, assessed using Von Frey monofilaments, recorded in mN

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - mechanical pain threshold

  Determination of mechanical pain threshold, assessed using pinprick stimulators, recorded in mN

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - sensitivity to pressure stimuli

  Determination of pressure pain threshold, assessed using pressure algometry, recorded in kg

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - temporal summation of electrical stimuli

  Determination of temporal summation in response to electrical stimuli delivered transcutaneously over the skin of the n. suralis and n. medianus. The numerical pain rating in response to these stimuli (range 0 - 100) will be recorded.

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - spinal hyperexcitability

  Determination of spinal hyperexcitability using the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR; sensitization of spinal cord neurons), recorded in mA

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing (QST) - temporal summation of spinal hyperexcitability

  Determination of temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR; sensitization of spinal cord neurons), recorded using a numeric pain rating scale (range 0 - 100)

  Baseline

• Quantitative sensory testing - conditioned pain modulation

  Determination of condition pain modulation (aka. pain inhibits pain) by means of a heterotopic noxious counterstimulation paradigm. Test stimuli comprise of pressure pain threshold assessments and application of a heat stimulus (using a thermode) corresponding to a temperature eliciting a visual analog scale rating of 5/10. Test stimuli will be applied before, during and after the conditioning stimulus which is the immersion of the hand in a hot circulating water bath of 45.5°C.

  Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (14)

• Central sensitization inventory

  Baseline

• Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire

  Baseline

• Pain catastrophizing scale

  Baseline

• Pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire

  Baseline

• Tampa scale for kinesiophobia

  Baseline

Study Arms (4)

Fibromyalgia patients

Fibromyalgia patients diagnosed according to the 2010 ACR-criteria

Neck pain patients

* Patients with non-specific, idiopathic neck pain complaints * Patients with neck pain complaints of traumatic origin type whiplash grade 1 (pain, stiffness or tenderness of the neck and no objective physical abnormalities) and grade 2 (neck complaints and musculoskeletal disorders such as reduced range of motion and tender pain points) according to the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash Associated Disorders

Low back pain patients

Patients with non-specific, idiopathic back pain complaints

Healthy controls

Age, sex and BMI-matched healthy controls

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

* Fibromyalgia patients (n=30) diagnosed according to the 2010 ACR-criteria * Patients with non-specific, idiopathic neck pain complaints which are acute (n=30) or chronic (n=30) * Patients with neck pain complaints of traumatic origin type whiplash grade 1 (pain, stiffness or tenderness of the neck and no objective physical abnormalities) and grade 2 (neck complaints and musculoskeletal disorders such as reduced range of motion and tender pain points) according to the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash Associated Disorders which is acute (n=30) or chronic (n=30) * Patients with non-specific, idiopathic back pain complaints which are acute (n=30) or chronic (n=30) * Healthy controls (n=30) matched based on age, sex and BMI

You may qualify if:

• \- diagnosed according to 2010 ACR-criteria
• \- having idiopathic neck pain complaints or having grade 1 (pain, stiffness or tenderness of the neck and without objective physical abnormalities) or grade 2 (neck complaints and musculoskeletal disorders such as decreased range of motion and tender pain points) according to the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash Associated Disorders
• \- having idiopathic low back pain complaints
• no history of serious pain complaints (e.g. severe migraine, fibromyalgia, etc.)
• no low back or neck pain complaints with an intensity of ≥2/10 on a visual analogue scale in the past year and of such severity that the daily activities were disrupted and a (para)medic was consulted

You may not qualify if:

• history of severe respiratory (e.g. cystic fibrosis), orthopedic (e.g. whiplash trauma), neurological (e.g. cerebrovascular incident), cardiovascular (e.g. severe hypertension), or endocrinological (e.g. diabetes) disorders
• recent psychological trauma (e.g. post-traumatic stress disorder)
• history of spinal surgery (e.g. lumbar discectomy), spinal trauma (e.g. vertebral fracture), or severe spinal deformities (e.g. spondylolisthesis)
• BMI ≥35 (due to potential difficulties in obtaining an NFR in severely overweight individuals)
• pregnancy, lactation, or within 1 year postpartum

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University Ghent: lead

Study Sites (1)

Ghent University

Ghent, Belgium

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia; Neck Pain; Low Back Pain; Whiplash Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Rheumatic Diseases; Neuromuscular Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Back Pain; Neck Injuries; Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

• Jessica Van Oosterwijck

  University Ghent

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Sophie Van Oosterwijck

CONTACT

+329 332 69 22; sophie.vanoosterwijck@ugent.be

Jessica Van Oosterwijck

CONTACT

jessica.vanoosterwijck@ugent.be

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE CONTROL
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: March 22, 2022
• First Posted: April 11, 2022
• Study Start: April 21, 2022
• Primary Completion: October 1, 2024
• Study Completion: October 1, 2024
• Last Updated: January 5, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Locations

BE (1)