Presence of Signs of Central Sensitization in Episodic and Chronic Migraine
CENSENMI
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nowadays migraine is conceptualized as a continuum, with at the one hand episodic migraine (EM) and at the other hand chronic migraine (CM) (1). The general aim of the study is to determine where exactly in this continuum central sensitization (CS) appears. Recent studies support the presence of CS in migraine patients (2,3), but controversial evidence exists about where in the continuum exactly CS appears. Some studies determined no differences in sings of CS between EM and CM (4,5), whether other research indicate a clear difference between EM and CM (6-8). However a significant difference in CS parameters could be determined between a patient group (EM or CM) and a healthy control group (3,4,8). In addition, CS appears to be present during the migraine attack (2). In this research, the presence of signs of CS will be determined in between headache phases. The primary outcome measure is identification of CS by PPT, QST, TS, CPM and CSI. Secondary outcome measures are the outcome of the MIDAS, HADS and EUROLIGHT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedNovember 18, 2023
November 1, 2023
10 months
September 27, 2021
November 16, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Extend of central sensitization by quantitative sensory testing (QST) in °C.
The primary outcome will include heat detection treshold and heat pain treshold.
at baseline
Extend of Central sensitization by central sensitization inventory (CSI) as a scale
The primary outcome will include the score of each participant on the CSI questionnaire.
at baseline
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Extend of Disability measured by the MIDAS questionnaire.
at baseline
Extend of Anxiety and depression measured by the HADS questionnaire.
at baseline
Study Arms (2)
Healthy controls
OTHERHealthy controls
Patients with migraine
OTHERInterventions
PPT will be performed firstly at the anterior tibial muscle halfway between the most superior attachment to the tibia and its tendon in the upper one third of the muscle belly (13) and secondly at the middle of the temporalis muscle (12), using a digital algometer (Wagner FPX 50) with a 1 cm2 rubber tip. The pressure algometer will apply a perpendicular increasing pressure (1kg/s) at the different test locations until the participant reports the first feeling of pain. The PPT of 4 series of ascending stimulus intensities, with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 20sec between the different stimuli and an ISI of 60sec between the 2 locations, will be measured. The first stimulus is a familiarization stimulus. Afterwards the mean of the 3 subsequent stimuli will be calculated.
The thermal tests will be performed unilateral at tibial anterior, thenar and the forehead, using a TSA-2 (Neuro Sensory Analyzer, MEDOC). At first cold and heat detection thresholds will be measured. The patient will be asked to indicate when they feel a change in temperature. Afterwards the patient will be asked to indicate when the stimulus becomes painful to determine the cold and heat pain thresholds. The thresholds of 4 series of stimuli will be measured. The first stimulus is a familiarization stimulus. Afterwards the mean of the 3 subsequent stimuli will be calculated for every location. The subject will push a button when the thresholds are reached. The baseline temperature will be 32°C and the stimuli will increase with 1°C/s (14).
The temporal summation will be assessed at the thenar eminence (19,20) using a ramp and hold protocol with the TSA-2 (Neuro Sensory Analyzer, MEDOC). Heat stimuli will be applied for a duration of 15sec. The stimulus temperature will increase from a baseline temperature of 35°C for 9sec at a sensitivity-adjusted rate of about 1,5°C/s until the HTP 5/10 of the thenar is reached. Afterwards the temperature will remain steady for the next 6 seconds. The maximal pain rating should be 50 ± 10 NRS. Subjects rate the pain intensity at the end of the ramp (9sec) and at the end of the hold procedure (15sec) using the NRS. Afterwards the ramp and hold aftersensations are measured. The subjects have to rate the pain intensity every 5sec for 30sec after the termination of the heat stimulus.
CPM will be assessed by comparing heat pain thresholds and pressure pain thresholds before and after giving a conditioning stimulus at a pain free distant zone by using a second thermode of the TSA-2 (17). The conditioning stimulus (HPT 4/10 (18) at the TA) will be applied for 120 seconds. The first test stimulus will be applied at the forehead 30 seconds after the start of the conditioning stimulus (17). The HPT will be measured twice with an ISI of 20 seconds. Immediately after the end of the application of the conditioning stimulus (120 seconds), the HPT at the forehead will be measured again twice, with an ISI of 20 seconds. Afterwards, there will be 10 minutes of rest to avoid bias.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of migraine headache based on the criteria of ICDH-3 and verified by a medical doctor,
- not being pregnant or have given birth in the preceding year,
- adults between the age of 18 years and 65 years.
You may not qualify if:
- any other diagnosis of headache or mixed form,
- any structural neurological syndrome, 3) any neurological brain event in the past,
- \) surgery at the head, neck or shoulder the last 3 years.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- In total, three investigators are involved. One is in charge for the screening process, and is not blinded for the status of the participants. The second investigator, i.e. the outcome assessor, is blinded for the status of the participants, and performs the clinical assessments (NOT the questionnaires). A third senior researcher is supervising the process.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2021
First Posted
December 17, 2021
Study Start
October 15, 2021
Primary Completion
August 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share