NCT05320432

Brief Summary

First-trimester abortion aspiration procedures are painful and sedation is typically provided. It is unsafe to drive after sedation due to the prolonged motor delay from some anesthetic agents. Without a known escort, most clinics do not allow patients to use public transportation, taxis, or rideshare services. Arranging a ride may be harder for those seeking abortion care than other surgical procedures given privacy concerns and the need to travel far distances. Additionally, some people have medical reasons that makes sedation in an outpatient abortion clinic unsafe. As abortion restrictions increase and more people need to travel far distances to access care, it is important to investigate non-pharmacologic pain control options. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivers a low-level electrical current through the skin. By activating the descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system, these pulses of electrical current reduce sensitivity to pain. TENS has been shown to be effective in decreasing pain with menstrual cramps and during medication abortion, and it was found to be non-inferior to IV sedation for first-trimester procedural abortion. However, it remains unclear if TENS is better than ibuprofen and local anesthesia via paracervical block alone. The overarching goal of this research is to identify an inexpensive, non-pharmacologic, alternative pain control strategy for those with a medical or social contraindication to IV sedation. The specific aim of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of TENS to prevent pain during first-trimester procedural abortion. To achieve this objective, a blinded, randomized superiority trial comparing the use of TENS to sham for management of pain during first-trimester aspiration abortion is proposed. This research is significant because the validation of a non-pharmacologic pain management technique would decrease barriers to accessing abortion care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2022

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 11, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 20, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 21, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 21, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 25, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 25, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2022

Results QC Date

February 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 3, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain During Cervical Dilation

    Pain with manual cervical dilation, assessed by visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100mm; 0 being "no pain" and 100 being "worst pain imaginable")

    Intra-operative, collected during procedure (up to 30 seconds)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Pain During Procedure

    Intra-operative, collected during procedure (up to 30 seconds)

  • Overall Experience

    Post-operative, collected following procedure (up to 20 minutes)

  • Procedure Time

    up to 20 minutes

  • Provider Perceived Ease of Procedure

    Post-operative, collected after procedure (up to 30 seconds)

  • Time Spent in Recovery

    up to 1 hour

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

EXPERIMENTAL

Prior to the procedure, the patient will have two sets of two self-adhesive electrodes placed parallel to the spinal cord at the T10-L1 and S2-S4 levels for TENS administration. For participants randomized to the experimental group, the non-blinded study coordinator will turn on the TENS unit 5 minutes prior to the procedure and monitor stimulating frequency level (80-100 Hz and pulse duration of 400 microseconds; intensity or frequency will be monitored to be administered to a non-painful level).

Device: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

Sham

SHAM COMPARATOR

For the participants randomized to sham, the same placement of electrodes will occur, but the unit will not be delivering electrical stimulation.

Device: Sham

Interventions

A low-level electrical current through the skin activates the descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
ShamDEVICE

No current applied through pads.

Sham

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old or older
  • English- or Spanish-fluency
  • \<12 weeks gestation
  • Presenting for aspiration abortion

You may not qualify if:

  • Planned use of oral or IV sedation
  • Contraindications to office-based procedure as determined by attending physician
  • Fetal demise
  • Requiring pre-procedure use of misoprostol
  • Contraindication to TENS units use (pacemaker or epilepsy)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stanford University

Palo Alto, California, 94305, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitationAnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Results Point of Contact

Title
Principal Investigator
Organization
Stanford University

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2022

First Posted

April 11, 2022

Study Start

January 20, 2023

Primary Completion

March 21, 2024

Study Completion

March 21, 2024

Last Updated

February 25, 2025

Results First Posted

February 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations