Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
Less Postoperative Pain and Length of Stay After Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Transabdominal Repair With Retro Rectus Mesh Placement (rTARUP) Compared With Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair (IPOM) for Small and Medium-sized Ventral Hernias
1 other identifier
observational
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparison of results after rTARUP and lap IPOM in patients with small- and medium-sized ventral hernia. Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing rTARUP or IPOM repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral and incisional hernias. The primary outcome was the postoperative need for transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block or epidural catheter, secondary outcomes were 30-day complications, and length of stay. All patients underwent elective surgery and were followed for 30 days postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2022
CompletedAugust 7, 2023
August 1, 2023
6 months
April 1, 2022
August 4, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
epidural blockade or TAP block
postoperative pain requiring epidural or TAP block
0-1 postoperative day
Secondary Outcomes (2)
readmissison
30 days
complications
30 days
Study Arms (2)
IPOM
receiving laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair
rTARUP
recieving robotic assited retromuscular repair
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Study population is all patients referred from primary sector and eligible for laparoscopic primary ventral or incisional hernia repair
You may qualify if:
- all patients undergoing elective minimally invasive repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral or incisional hernia repairs at one academic hernia center with an unrestricted patient referral.
- Consecutive patients undergoing IPOM (December 1st, 2017 - December 1st, 2018) and rTARUPrRetrorectus (March 1st, 2021 - June 1st, 2021).
You may not qualify if:
- open repairs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, 1650, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Christoffersen MW, Jorgensen LN, Jensen KK. Less postoperative pain and shorter length of stay after robot-assisted retrorectus hernia repair (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for small or medium-sized ventral hernias. Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1053-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09608-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
PMID: 36109358DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mette Willaume, phd
University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff specialist, MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2022
First Posted
April 11, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2021
Study Completion
October 1, 2021
Last Updated
August 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share