Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Ventral hernias are a common disease and one half of all individuals are born with or will acquire a ventral hernia in their lifetime. Repair of ventral hernias may be associated with significant morbidity, including surgical site infection, hernia recurrence and reoperation. Minimally invasive ventral hernia repair decreases rates of surgical site infection and hospital length of stay, without affecting recurrence, however the laparoscopic approach to ventral hernia repair accounts for only about 1/3 of all total hernia repairs performed in the US. Recent large database studies have suggested that robotic ventral hernia repair may be associated with decreased hospital length of stay. However, this study is affected by common biases of database studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the true impact of robotics for ventral hernia repair.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 12, 2022
CompletedMay 25, 2022
May 1, 2022
2 years
March 21, 2018
May 23, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total number of days in the hospital
Total number of days spent in the hospital. This will be calculated by adding the hospital length of stay for initial surgery, length of stay for any additional readmission resulting from the surgery, and emergency room visits resulting from the surgery. This information will be collected up to 90 days after the surgery.
90 days post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
post-operative at 1 month, 90 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years
Surgical Site Occurrence (SSO)
post-operative at 1 month, 90 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years
Hernia Reoccurence
post-operative at 1 month, 90 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years
Patient centered outcomes
post-operative at 1 month, 90 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years
Patient centered outcomes
post-operative at 1 month, 90 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Laparoscopic Repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe abdomen will be entered and insufflated utilizing a 5 mm optical port. Only 5 mm ports will be utilized laterally to take down all anterior abdominal wall adhesions. A mid-density polypropylene mesh with a one-sided adhesion barrier that provides at least 5 cm of overlap in all directions will be inserted through a 11 or 12 mm port placed through the defect. Excision of hernia sac and preperitoneal fat and defect closure will be performed per current practice. The mesh will be secured in four points with 0-PDS sutures and/or tacked with a double crown of tacks per our current practice.
Robotic Repair
EXPERIMENTALThree lateral ports will be placed including a 12 port for the camera. Adhesions will be taken down from the anterior abdominal wall. Hernia sac and preperitoneal fat will be excised per current practice and defect will be closed using a running locking barbed suture. A mid-density polypropylene mesh with a one-sided adhesion barrier that provides at least 5 cm of overlap in all directions will be inserted through the 12 mm port. The mesh will be secured circumferentially with a running barbed suture.
Interventions
The surgeon will be utilizing a robotic system to repair the hernia.
The surgeon will be repairing the hernia laparoscopically.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients undergoing elective ventral hernia repair deemed appropriate for minimally invasive repair.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unlikely to survive beyond 2 years based upon surgeon judgment (e.g. advanced cirrhosis or metastatic cancer)
- Patients unlikely to follow-up (e.g. lives out of state or no phone)
- Advanced COPD or CHF
- History of open abdomen or extensive lysis of adhesions for bowel obstruction
- Ascites due to cirrhosis or malignancy
- Active infection such as infected mesh
- Ventral hernia size greater than 12 cm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
UT Health-Memorial Hermann
Houston, Texas, 77024, United States
UTHealth-Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77026, United States
Related Publications (15)
Cherla DV, Moses ML, Viso CP, Holihan JL, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Kao LS, Ko TC, Liang MK. Impact of Abdominal Wall Hernias and Repair on Patient Quality of Life. World J Surg. 2018 Jan;42(1):19-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4173-6.
PMID: 28828517BACKGROUNDLiang MK, Holihan JL, Itani K, Alawadi ZM, Gonzalez JR, Askenasy EP, Ballecer C, Chong HS, Goldblatt MI, Greenberg JA, Harvin JA, Keith JN, Martindale RG, Orenstein S, Richmond B, Roth JS, Szotek P, Towfigh S, Tsuda S, Vaziri K, Berger DH. Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review. Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):80-89. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701.
PMID: 28009730BACKGROUNDHolihan JL, Alawadi Z, Martindale RG, Roth JS, Wray CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK. Adverse Events after Ventral Hernia Repair: The Vicious Cycle of Complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 9.
PMID: 26206646BACKGROUNDHolihan JL, Hannon C, Goodenough C, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Itani KM, Olavarria O, Mo J, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK. Ventral Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Aug/Sep;18(6):647-658. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.029. Epub 2017 May 30.
PMID: 28557648BACKGROUNDHolihan JL, Alawadi ZM, Harris JW, Harvin J, Shah SK, Goodenough CJ, Kao LS, Liang MK, Roth JS, Walker PA, Ko TC. Ventral hernia: Patient selection, treatment, and management. Curr Probl Surg. 2016 Jul;53(7):307-54. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 27569431BACKGROUNDCarbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS, Ballecer CD, Janczyk RJ, Herrera J, Huang LC, Phillips S, Rosen MJ, Poulose BK. Reducing Length of Stay Using a Robotic-assisted Approach for Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair: A Comparative Analysis From the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):210-217. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002244.
PMID: 28350568BACKGROUNDPrabhu AS, Dickens EO, Copper CM, Mann JW, Yunis JP, Phillips S, Huang LC, Poulose BK, Rosen MJ. Laparoscopic vs Robotic Intraperitoneal Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia: An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Aug;225(2):285-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
PMID: 28450062BACKGROUNDPrete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, Testini M, Marzaioli R, Patriti A, Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Gurrado A, Strippoli GFM. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg. 2018 Jun;267(6):1034-1046. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002523.
PMID: 28984644BACKGROUNDTasiopoulou VS, Svokos AA, Svokos KA, Zacharoulis D, Magouliotis DE. Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a review of the current evidence. Minerva Chir. 2018 Feb;73(1):55-63. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07583-6. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
PMID: 29243456BACKGROUNDIlic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, Jung JH, Murphy D, Frydenberg M. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
PMID: 28895658BACKGROUNDCoakley KM, Sims SM, Prasad T, Lincourt AE, Augenstein VA, Sing RF, Heniford BT, Colavita PD. A nationwide evaluation of robotic ventral hernia surgery. Am J Surg. 2017 Dec;214(6):1158-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
PMID: 29017732BACKGROUNDMuysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RK, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
PMID: 19495920BACKGROUNDDhanani NH, Lyons NB, Olavarria OA, Bernardi K, Holihan JL, Shah SK, Wilson TD, Loor MM, Kao LS, Liang MK. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: Two-Year Results From a Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):161-165. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005903. Epub 2023 May 19.
PMID: 37203558DERIVEDDhanani NH, Olavarria OA, Holihan JL, Shah SK, Wilson TD, Loor MM, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: One-year Results From a Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2021 Jun 1;273(6):1076-1080. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004795.
PMID: 33630447DERIVEDOlavarria OA, Bernardi K, Shah SK, Wilson TD, Wei S, Pedroza C, Avritscher EB, Loor MM, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2020 Jul 14;370:m2457. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2457.
PMID: 32665218DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shinil Shah, DO
UTHealth-Memorial Hermann
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mike K Liang, MD
UTHealth-Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2018
First Posted
April 6, 2018
Study Start
April 3, 2018
Primary Completion
April 9, 2020
Study Completion
May 12, 2022
Last Updated
May 25, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share