NCT05318378

Brief Summary

Proximal femur fractures (PFF) are a worldwide public health concern. A delay in the diagnosis and treatment worsens the prognosis. Inversion of grayscale is a tool available on most X-rays visualization software, and its use has been suggested to improve radiological diagnosis. The study aims to determine if using inverted grayscale radiography results in better diagnoses of PFF among medical students. Material and Methods. The investigators evaluated the detection of PFF by fifth-year medical students on a series of 30 pelvis X-rays. The series was composed of 20 X-rays with PFF and 10 X-rays without fracture. A first reading session was set up where X-rays were presented separately in conventional and inverted grayscale. A second session one month later showed both grayscale visualizations together (BIcontrast X-rays Analysis Method - BIXAM). X-rays' order of appearance was randomized. The investigators performed the same evaluation on senior orthopedic surgeons as a control. Finally, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were assessed for each method (conventional, inverted, and BIXAM) with the McNemar test. Subgroup analyses were performed on the fracture localization (femoral neck, trochanteric).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 31, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2022

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2022

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

March 30, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • accuracy

    accuracy was compared between conventional and inverted grayscales or both images shown together (BIXAM series) with non-parametric McNemar test

    one month

  • Sensibility, specificity,

    Sensibility, specificity were compared between conventional and inverted grayscales or both images shown together (BIXAM series) with non-parametric McNemar test

    one month

Study Arms (2)

student

EXPERIMENTAL

Twenty fifth-year medical students were asked to participate in the study

Diagnostic Test: BIXAM

senior surgeon

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

As controls, we asked 3 independent board-certified orthopedic surgeons to participate in the study following the same conditions as described previously.

Diagnostic Test: BIXAM

Interventions

BIXAMDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Series two consisted of inverted and conventional X-rays of the same subject (BIXAM) shown together

senior surgeonstudent

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • fifth-year medical students

You may not qualify if:

  • other medical students

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aphp

Paris, 75018, France

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • cedric maillot

    APHP

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

cedric maillot, msc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
We built two series of images. Series one was composed of separated conventional and inverted images. Series two consisted of inverted and conventional X-rays of the same subject (BIXAM) shown together (Figure). An independent assessor randomly duplicated four and two images for series one and two, respectively, to evaluate the intra-observer agreement. The same assessor randomized the images' order of appearance for the two series with a free online available list randomizer (www.randomizer.org). The principal investigator was blinded to the randomization during the sessions.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2022

First Posted

April 8, 2022

Study Start

January 31, 2022

Primary Completion

March 31, 2022

Study Completion

April 30, 2022

Last Updated

April 8, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations