Inverting Grayscale Improves Detection of Proximal Femur Fracture
Inverting Grayscale in Conventional Orthopedics X-rays Improves Detection of Proximal Femur Fracture Among Undergraduate Medical Students
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Proximal femur fractures (PFF) are a worldwide public health concern. A delay in the diagnosis and treatment worsens the prognosis. Inversion of grayscale is a tool available on most X-rays visualization software, and its use has been suggested to improve radiological diagnosis. The study aims to determine if using inverted grayscale radiography results in better diagnoses of PFF among medical students. Material and Methods. The investigators evaluated the detection of PFF by fifth-year medical students on a series of 30 pelvis X-rays. The series was composed of 20 X-rays with PFF and 10 X-rays without fracture. A first reading session was set up where X-rays were presented separately in conventional and inverted grayscale. A second session one month later showed both grayscale visualizations together (BIcontrast X-rays Analysis Method - BIXAM). X-rays' order of appearance was randomized. The investigators performed the same evaluation on senior orthopedic surgeons as a control. Finally, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were assessed for each method (conventional, inverted, and BIXAM) with the McNemar test. Subgroup analyses were performed on the fracture localization (femoral neck, trochanteric).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2022
CompletedApril 8, 2022
March 1, 2022
2 months
March 30, 2022
April 7, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
accuracy
accuracy was compared between conventional and inverted grayscales or both images shown together (BIXAM series) with non-parametric McNemar test
one month
Sensibility, specificity,
Sensibility, specificity were compared between conventional and inverted grayscales or both images shown together (BIXAM series) with non-parametric McNemar test
one month
Study Arms (2)
student
EXPERIMENTALTwenty fifth-year medical students were asked to participate in the study
senior surgeon
ACTIVE COMPARATORAs controls, we asked 3 independent board-certified orthopedic surgeons to participate in the study following the same conditions as described previously.
Interventions
Series two consisted of inverted and conventional X-rays of the same subject (BIXAM) shown together
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- fifth-year medical students
You may not qualify if:
- other medical students
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aphp
Paris, 75018, France
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
cedric maillot
APHP
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- We built two series of images. Series one was composed of separated conventional and inverted images. Series two consisted of inverted and conventional X-rays of the same subject (BIXAM) shown together (Figure). An independent assessor randomly duplicated four and two images for series one and two, respectively, to evaluate the intra-observer agreement. The same assessor randomized the images' order of appearance for the two series with a free online available list randomizer (www.randomizer.org). The principal investigator was blinded to the randomization during the sessions.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2022
First Posted
April 8, 2022
Study Start
January 31, 2022
Primary Completion
March 31, 2022
Study Completion
April 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share