Effect of Cone Beam Computed Tomography on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Decision Making
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
this study will determine the effect of CBCT examinations on diagnostic and therapeutic decision making in endodontics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2020
CompletedDecember 30, 2020
December 1, 2020
1.4 years
December 11, 2020
December 25, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in diagnosis and treatment planning
Comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic decision making between gold standard and radiographic findings.
1 year
Study Arms (1)
intervention
EXPERIMENTALdiagnosis and treatment plan before and after cone beam computed tomography scan
Interventions
Change in diagnosis and treatment plans between the two imaging - periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients in which disease had to be ruled out:
- patients with symptomatic vital teeth otherwise judged healthy (no exposed dentin; normal sensitivity pulp tests; no tenderness to palpation or percussion; with radiographic apical/marginal periodontal normalcy; and no cracks/fractures)
- patients with symptomatic root-filled teeth otherwise judged healthy (good quality of root filling that did not need to be revised or completed; no tenderness to palpation or percussion; with radiographic apical/marginal periodontal normalcy; and no cracks/fractures)
- when conventional radiology failed to demonstrate if a finding was a pathological process or a normal anatomical structure.
- Patients in which suspected disease had to be confirmed:
- suspected dental fractures that could not be demonstrated
- suspected external or internal resorptions.
- As an aid in performing the therapeutic intervention:
- in established external or internal resorptions to assist in the approach of complex cases
- before apical surgery when important anatomical structures interfered with the surgical approach
- in diagnosing foreign body structures, their location and, when needed, as a guide in the surgical removal
- in understanding tooth anatomy of abnormal teeth in need of endodontic treatment
- in assessing the number and location of root canals after at least one unsuccessful attempt to find them under oral microscope.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will not be referred for CBCT examination if they:
- presented themselves with an accessible previous volume tomography in the region of interest. This was, however, not a strict restriction if the examiner judged that new and relevant information could be obtained by a new CBCT examination
- had a definite diagnosis and treatment plan after a complete clinical and conventional radiographic examination and therefore did not need a CBCT examination. This group represented the vast majority of all patients
- needed any other special imaging technique for soft tissue assessment such as CT or magnetic resonanace imaging.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Post Graduate Institute of Dental Science
Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2020
First Posted
December 30, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 30, 2018
Study Completion
April 30, 2018
Last Updated
December 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12