Intravenous Versus Intraperitoneal Instillation of Ondansetron for Decreasing Incidence of Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries.
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study the effect of intraperitoneal instillation vs intravenous ondansetron on PONV added to intraperitoneal bupivacaine for enhanced recovery and to decrease incidence of PONV after laparoscopic surgeries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 26, 2025
CompletedFebruary 4, 2025
January 1, 2025
2.5 years
March 30, 2022
January 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
measure incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting
The number of patient suffering from postoperative nausea and vomiting in each group
24 hours postoperative
measure severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale (S-PNVIS) 1. \*Frequency of Nausea:\* * 0: None * 1: Occasionally (1-2 times a day) * 2: Frequently (3-4 times a day) * 3: Constantly (more than 4 times a day) 2. \*Frequency of Vomiting:\* * 0: None * 1: Once a day * 2: 2-3 times a day * 3: More than 3 times a day 3. \*Impact on Daily Activities:\* * 0: No impact * 1: Mild impact (able to perform most activities) * 2: Moderate impact (some activities limited) * 3: Severe impact (most activities limited) #Scoring * \*Total Score:\* Sum of scores from all 3 items. * \*Interpretation:\* Higher total scores indicate a greater impact of nausea and vomiting on the patient recovery
24 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (5)
measure total numbers of rescue antiemetic
all over 24 hours postoperative.
Duration of hospital stay
24 hours to 72 hours
postoperative pain by Numerical Rating Scale
0 hour (basal) in PACU, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours postoperative
total dose of rescue analgesia postoperative
24 hours postoperative
Patient satisfaction
24 hours postoperative
Study Arms (3)
Intraperitoneal instillation of ondansetron and bupivacaine (group A)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive intraperitoneal instillation of (100 mg) 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % and (4 mg) 2 ml ondansetron through abdominal ports by simple instillation technique before removal of trocars then clamping of abdominal drains for 1h to avoid drainage of LA.
Intravenous ondansetron and intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine (group B)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient will receive intravenous (4 mg) 2 ml ondansetron and intraperitoneal instillation of (100 mg) 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % through abdominal ports by simple instillation technique before removal of trocars then clamping of abdominal drains for 1h to avoid drainage of LA.
Intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine (group C)
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatient will receive intraperitoneal instillation of (100 mg) 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % through abdominal ports by simple instillation technique before removal of trocars then clamping of abdominal drains for 1h to avoid drainage of LA.
Interventions
The aim is to detect the effect of intraperitoneal instillation of ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
The aim is to detect effect of intravenous ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
The aim is to detect effect of intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent from the patient.
- Age: 21-60 years old.
- female patients
- Physical status: ASA 1\& II.
- BMI = ≤ 35 kg/m2).
- Type of operation: elective laparoscopic gynecological surgeries.
You may not qualify if:
- Altered mental state.
- Patients with known history of allergy to the study drugs.
- hepatic, renal impairment or disease , cardiovascular, and respiratory diseases.
- Patients with chronic pain received NSAID or opioid during previous two weeks.
- Patients with history of PONV or motion sickness and patients received antiemetic therapy 24 h before the surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
faculty of human medicine, Zagazig university hospitals
El Sharkia, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessor (anesthesiologist not sharing in the study) will assess outcome parameters
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2022
First Posted
April 8, 2022
Study Start
July 1, 2022
Primary Completion
January 15, 2025
Study Completion
January 26, 2025
Last Updated
February 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share