NCT04825210

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a universal prevention program delivered by psychologists in conjunction with pediatric primary care well-child visits.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 25, 2021

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2021

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 13, 2021

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 24, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 24, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 13, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

March 25, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 12, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Behavioral HealthIntegrated Behavioral HealthInfant Self-RegulationParenting Skills

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Infant self-regulation

    The Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised Very Short Form is a 36-item measure of three factors, positive affect, negative emotionality, and orienting/regulatory capacity. Scores range from 0 to 7, with higher scores representing greater positive affect, negative emotionality and orienting and regulatory capacity.

    7-month follow-up

  • Parental knowledge of child development

    The Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory is 58-item measure of caregiver knowledge of infant development. The total score will be calculated as the percentage of correct answers out of 58 items.

    7-month follow-up

  • Maternal parenting behaviors

    The Keys to Interactive Parenting Scale (KIPS) will be used to assess maternal parenting behaviors. KIPS is a structured observational measure and assesses 12 domains of parenting. The domains are scored on a 1 to 5-point scale with higher scores indicating higher quality parenting behaviors.

    7-month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Parenting beliefs and practices

    7-month follow-up

  • Maternal feelings of efficacy in infant care

    7-month follow-up

  • Maternal appraisement of life stress

    7-month follow-up

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Maternal experiences of violence and adversity in childhood

    Baseline

  • Adherence to well-child visits in first 7 months of life

    Infants' birth through 7-months of age

  • Health Service Utilization - Immunizations

    Infants' birth through 5-months of age

Study Arms (2)

Integrated Behavioral Health - Prevention (IBH-P)

EXPERIMENTAL

The IBH-P intervention addresses four areas: 1) assessment of emotional and behavioral adjustment, 2) parental education on important supports for emotional and behavioral health, 3) modeling and guidance on nurturing and responsive parenting, and 4) addressing parental concerns about and promoting child self-regulation. The primary focus of IBH-P is promoting infant self-regulation by teaching mothers how to soothe and calm their baby. Trauma-informed and relationship building methods are emphasized to acknowledge maternal experiences with violence and adversity and the desire to establish a strong working alliance. IBH-P is distinguished from Bright Futures through its emphasis on experiential learning, modeling of effective parenting skills, in-session practice and feedback, and proactive problem-solving. Families in IBH-P will receive all standard care elements of the well-child visit including pediatrician implementation of Bright Futures curriculum.

Behavioral: Integrated Behavioral Health - Prevention

Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 4th Edition

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Bright Futures control condition consists of standard of care in addressing emotional and behavioral health as provided by pediatricians. Pediatricians will follow the 4th edition of the Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents \[pocket guide\]. Guidelines are provided for topics to discuss and anticipatory guidance at each well-child visit. In contrast to IBH-P, there is an emphasis on didactic presentation, teaching mothers about developmental milestones, and responding to questions and concerns. These include discussions of crying, soothing, and feeding, although self-regulation is not a unifying theme.

Behavioral: Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 4th Edition

Interventions

IBH-P consists of 15-30 minute visits with mothers as part of the 1, 2, 4, and 6 month well-child visits. The intervention is delivered by doctoral level pediatric psychologists that are an integrated member of the primary care team.

Integrated Behavioral Health - Prevention (IBH-P)

Bright Futures curriculum will be delivered by the pediatrician as part of the 1, 2, 4 and 6 month well-child visits.

Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 4th Edition

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • English speaking
  • Biological mother of a newborn infant presenting at the newborn well-child visit
  • Intends to continue to receive infant's pediatric care at one of the three participating clinics over the next year.

You may not qualify if:

  • Infant diagnosed as failure to thrive
  • Infant exposure to illicit drugs in utero with the exception of THC
  • Extensive care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (\>7 days)
  • Child has other serious medical condition or acute psychosocial circumstances that results in child not receiving medical clearance from the pediatrician or psychologist for randomization
  • mother or father of infant has received Building Futures intervention training

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Bright futures pocket guide (4th ed.). (2017). American Academy of Pediatrics.

    BACKGROUND
  • Putnam SP, Helbig AL, Gartstein MA, Rothbart MK, Leerkes E. Development and assessment of short and very short forms of the infant behavior questionnaire-revised. J Pers Assess. 2014;96(4):445-58. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.841171. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

    PMID: 24206185BACKGROUND
  • MacPhee D. Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory: Manual. In. Colorado: Colorado State University; 2002.

    BACKGROUND
  • Winstanley A, Gattis M. The Baby Care Questionnaire: a measure of parenting principles and practices during infancy. Infant Behav Dev. 2013 Dec;36(4):762-75. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

    PMID: 24050932BACKGROUND
  • Teti DM, Gelfand DM. Behavioral competence among mothers of infants in the first year: the mediational role of maternal self-efficacy. Child Dev. 1991 Oct;62(5):918-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01580.x.

    PMID: 1756667BACKGROUND
  • Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6668417BACKGROUND
  • Pachter LM, Lieberman L, Bloom SL, Fein JA. Developing a Community-Wide Initiative to Address Childhood Adversity and Toxic Stress: A Case Study of The Philadelphia ACE Task Force. Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S130-S135. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.012.

    PMID: 28865645BACKGROUND
  • Campo JV, Geist R, Kolko DJ. Integration of Pediatric Behavioral Health Services in Primary Care: Improving Access and Outcomes with Collaborative Care. Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;63(7):432-438. doi: 10.1177/0706743717751668. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

    PMID: 29673268BACKGROUND
  • Taichman DB, Sahni P, Pinborg A, Peiperl L, Laine C, James A, Hong ST, Haileamlak A, Gollogly L, Godlee F, Frizelle FA, Florenzano F, Drazen JM, Bauchner H, Baethge C, Backus J. Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials: A Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jul 4;167(1):63-65. doi: 10.7326/M17-1028. Epub 2017 Jun 6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28586790BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Robert T Ammerman, PhD

    Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, OH USA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2021

First Posted

April 1, 2021

Study Start

April 13, 2021

Primary Completion

August 24, 2022

Study Completion

August 24, 2022

Last Updated

September 13, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Consistent with the open science movement and with the directive of clinicaltrials.gov to include a data sharing plan in submissions, we will have the following data sharing policy: we will share with other investigators (1) all individual participant data after deidentification, and (2) study management documents (protocol, statistical analysis plan, consent form, analytic code, data dictionary).

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data and supporting information will be made available three months after publication of the primary article and ending five years after publication.
Access Criteria
Those requesting data will be required to submit a proposal to Robert.Ammerman@cchmc.org. This will be reviewed by the investigative team for methodological soundness and scientific merit before data is shared. This plan is consistent with guidelines developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (Taichman et al., 2017).

Locations