Muscle Relaxants and Laryngeal Local Anesthetics for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Decreasing Propofol in Elderly
LMA
The Impact of Using Muscle Relaxants and Laryngeal Local Anesthetics for Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion on Hemodynamics and Induction Anesthetics Dosage in Elderly
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is currently the most widely used supraglottic airway device with advantages of simple and fast placement, reduced anesthesia drug use, more stable hemodynamics, and less throat discomfort after anesthesia compared to endotracheal intubation. Some studies claimed the use of muscle relaxants or local anesthetics (sprays or lubricants containing local anesthetics) for the throat before LMA placement can reduce the dosage of induction agents and postoperative throat complications. In modern society, more and more elderly people undergo elective surgery with the need of general anesthesia. However, they are the more vulnerable population with tendency of greater hemodynamic changes with more induction agent usage. Propofol is one of the most used induction agents which may lead to a drop in blood pressure. The objective of this study is to observe whether the dose of propofol and the changes in hemodynamics can be reduced by using muscle relaxants or laryngeal local anesthetics in elderly who receiving general anesthesia with LMA insertion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 24, 2023
CompletedFebruary 6, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.4 years
March 16, 2022
February 4, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Propofol requirement
The minimal propofol requirement dose was defined as the median effective dose (ED50) of movement or increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) to no movement or stable MAP. The ED50 is the average of the crossover midpoints found during conducting the Dixon's up-and-down method.
one minute after propofol infusion
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP)
0 minute, 1 minute, 2 minute, 3 minute, 4 minute, 5 minute, 10 minute after LMA placement
Heart rate (HR)
0 minute, 1 minute, 2 minute, 3 minute, 4 minute, 5 minute, 10 minute after LMA placement
Oxygen saturation (SpO2)
0 minute, 1 minute, 2 minute, 3 minute, 4 minute, 5 minute, 10 minute after LMA placement
Peak pressure (P peak) of the airway
0 minute after LMA placement
Mean pressure (P mean) of the airway
0 minute after LMA placement
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
10% lidocaine spray and cisatracurium group
EXPERIMENTALThe subjects received laryngeal local anesthetics (10% lidocaine spray), intravenous cisatracurium 0.12 mg/kg, and propofol before laryngeal mask airway placement. The predetermined dosage of propofol for the first subject is 1 mg/kg.
10% lidocaine spray and placebo of cisatracurium group
EXPERIMENTALThe subjects received laryngeal local anesthetics (10% lidocaine spray), intravenous normal saline as a substitute for cisatracurium, and propofol before laryngeal mask airway placement. The predetermined dosage of propofol for the first subject is 1.25 mg/kg.
Placebo of lidocaine spray and cisatracurium group
EXPERIMENTALThe subjects received normal saline spray as a substitute for laryngeal local anesthetics (10% lidocaine spray), intravenous cisatracurium 0.12 mg/kg, and propofol before laryngeal mask airway placement. The predetermined dosage of propofol for the first subject is 1 mg/kg.
Placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe subjects received normal saline spray as a substitute for laryngeal local anesthetics (10% lidocaine spray), intravenous normal saline as a substitute for cisatracurium, and propofol before laryngeal mask airway placement. The predetermined dosage of propofol for the first subject is 2 mg/kg.
Interventions
10% lidocaine spray 3 puff for the throat before induction
Normal saline spray 3 puff for the throat before induction
Intravenous cisatracurium 0.12 mg/kg during induction
Intravenous normal saline during induction
The dosage of intravenous propofol for the first subjects was predetermined for each arm, and the dosage for the subsequent subjects would be determined according to the response of the previous subjects using the Dixon's up-and-down method with a step size of 0.25 mg/kg. If the subjects had no movement and stable hemodynamic status during and after the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) placement, the predetermined dosage of propofol for the subsequent subject would be decreased by 0.25 mg/kg. On the other hand, if the subjects had obvious movement, failure to LMA placement, and significant hemodynamic changes, the predetermined dosage of propofol for the subsequent subject would be increased by 0.25 mg/kg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- Age: over 65 years
- Elective orthopedic surgery undergo general anesthesia in supine position
You may not qualify if:
- Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati score 3-4), limited mouth opening, intra-oral and pharyngeal pathology
- Risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents (full stomach)
- Obesity (Body mass index \> 35)
- Significant lung abnormalities (low lung compliance, high airway resistance, impaired oxygenation)
- Loosening teeth
- Allergic to Cisatracurium or Lidocaine
- Failure in successful LMA insertion after second attempts
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Linkup Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Chung Yung-Tai, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hung Yu-Ting, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2022
First Posted
April 4, 2022
Study Start
April 12, 2022
Primary Completion
August 24, 2023
Study Completion
August 24, 2023
Last Updated
February 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share