NCT05310110

Brief Summary

Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is currently the most widely used supraglottic airway device with advantages of simple and fast placement, reduced anesthesia drug use, more stable hemodynamics, and less throat discomfort after anesthesia compared to endotracheal intubation. Some studies claimed the use of muscle relaxants or local anesthetics (sprays or lubricants containing local anesthetics) for the throat before LMA placement can reduce the dosage of induction agents and postoperative throat complications. In modern society, more and more elderly people undergo elective surgery with the need of general anesthesia. However, they are the more vulnerable population with tendency of greater hemodynamic changes with more induction agent usage. Propofol is one of the most used induction agents which may lead to a drop in blood pressure. The objective of this study is to observe whether the dose of propofol and the changes in hemodynamics can be reduced by using muscle relaxants or laryngeal local anesthetics in elderly who receiving general anesthesia with LMA insertion.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 16, 2022

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 12, 2022

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 24, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 24, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Muscle relaxantsLaryngeal local anestheticsLaryngeal mask airway, Laryngeal Masks, LMAPropofolElderly, Aged

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Propofol requirement

    The minimal propofol requirement dose was defined as the median effective dose (ED50) of movement or increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) to no movement or stable MAP. The ED50 is the average of the crossover midpoints found during conducting the Dixon's up-and-down method.

    one minute after propofol infusion

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP)

    0 minute, 1 minute, 2 minute, 3 minute, 4 minute, 5 minute, 10 minute after LMA placement

  • Heart rate (HR)

    0 minute, 1 minute, 2 minute, 3 minute, 4 minute, 5 minute, 10 minute after LMA placement

  • Oxygen saturation (SpO2)

    0 minute, 1 minute, 2 minute, 3 minute, 4 minute, 5 minute, 10 minute after LMA placement

  • Peak pressure (P peak) of the airway

    0 minute after LMA placement

  • Mean pressure (P mean) of the airway

    0 minute after LMA placement

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

10% lidocaine spray and cisatracurium group

EXPERIMENTAL

The subjects received laryngeal local anesthetics (10% lidocaine spray), intravenous cisatracurium 0.12 mg/kg, and propofol before laryngeal mask airway placement. The predetermined dosage of propofol for the first subject is 1 mg/kg.

Drug: 10% lidocaine sprayDrug: CisatracuriumDrug: Propofol

10% lidocaine spray and placebo of cisatracurium group

EXPERIMENTAL

The subjects received laryngeal local anesthetics (10% lidocaine spray), intravenous normal saline as a substitute for cisatracurium, and propofol before laryngeal mask airway placement. The predetermined dosage of propofol for the first subject is 1.25 mg/kg.

Drug: 10% lidocaine sprayDrug: Placebo of cisatracuriumDrug: Propofol

Placebo of lidocaine spray and cisatracurium group

EXPERIMENTAL

The subjects received normal saline spray as a substitute for laryngeal local anesthetics (10% lidocaine spray), intravenous cisatracurium 0.12 mg/kg, and propofol before laryngeal mask airway placement. The predetermined dosage of propofol for the first subject is 1 mg/kg.

Drug: Placebo of lidocaine sprayDrug: CisatracuriumDrug: Propofol

Placebo group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The subjects received normal saline spray as a substitute for laryngeal local anesthetics (10% lidocaine spray), intravenous normal saline as a substitute for cisatracurium, and propofol before laryngeal mask airway placement. The predetermined dosage of propofol for the first subject is 2 mg/kg.

Drug: Placebo of lidocaine sprayDrug: Placebo of cisatracuriumDrug: Propofol

Interventions

10% lidocaine spray 3 puff for the throat before induction

10% lidocaine spray and cisatracurium group10% lidocaine spray and placebo of cisatracurium group

Normal saline spray 3 puff for the throat before induction

Placebo groupPlacebo of lidocaine spray and cisatracurium group

Intravenous cisatracurium 0.12 mg/kg during induction

10% lidocaine spray and cisatracurium groupPlacebo of lidocaine spray and cisatracurium group

Intravenous normal saline during induction

10% lidocaine spray and placebo of cisatracurium groupPlacebo group

The dosage of intravenous propofol for the first subjects was predetermined for each arm, and the dosage for the subsequent subjects would be determined according to the response of the previous subjects using the Dixon's up-and-down method with a step size of 0.25 mg/kg. If the subjects had no movement and stable hemodynamic status during and after the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) placement, the predetermined dosage of propofol for the subsequent subject would be decreased by 0.25 mg/kg. On the other hand, if the subjects had obvious movement, failure to LMA placement, and significant hemodynamic changes, the predetermined dosage of propofol for the subsequent subject would be increased by 0.25 mg/kg.

10% lidocaine spray and cisatracurium group10% lidocaine spray and placebo of cisatracurium groupPlacebo groupPlacebo of lidocaine spray and cisatracurium group

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Age: over 65 years
  • Elective orthopedic surgery undergo general anesthesia in supine position

You may not qualify if:

  • Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati score 3-4), limited mouth opening, intra-oral and pharyngeal pathology
  • Risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents (full stomach)
  • Obesity (Body mass index \> 35)
  • Significant lung abnormalities (low lung compliance, high airway resistance, impaired oxygenation)
  • Loosening teeth
  • Allergic to Cisatracurium or Lidocaine
  • Failure in successful LMA insertion after second attempts

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Linkup Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscle Hypotonia

Interventions

cisatracuriumPropofol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Officials

  • Chung Yung-Tai, MD

    Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Hung Yu-Ting, MD

    Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2022

First Posted

April 4, 2022

Study Start

April 12, 2022

Primary Completion

August 24, 2023

Study Completion

August 24, 2023

Last Updated

February 6, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations