The Comparison of the Success Rate of the Endotracheal Intubation Between the Stylet and the Frova With Acute Angled Videolaryngoscope
1 other identifier
interventional
166
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of frova and stylet on the success rate of tracheal intubation when using a video laryngoscope.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedDecember 6, 2022
December 1, 2022
10 months
May 22, 2019
December 5, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate of first attempt of endotracheal intubation
The endotracheal intubation will be attempted using stylet or frova according to the randomized group. The success or failure of the attempt will be recorded.
for 10 minutes during anesthetic induction
Secondary Outcomes (1)
time for endotracheal intubation
for 10 minutes during anesthetic induction
Study Arms (2)
Frova
EXPERIMENTALFrova will be used to facilitate the endotracheal intubation.
Stylet
ACTIVE COMPARATORStylet will be used to facilitate the endotracheal intubation.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. adult patients aged over 19 years who are undergoing endotracheal intubation for elective surgery.
- \. Patients who have one of the predictors of difficult intubation such as Mallampati classification 3 or 4, limited the movement of the neck, body mass index less than 35 kg/m2, a distance from the tip of the chin to the thyroid cartilage of less than 6.5 cm, a interincisor distance less than 3.5 cm, inability to protrude of lower incisors over the upper incisors, or a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Patients receiving emergency surgery
- \. Pregnant women
- \. Patients scheduled for oral surgery such as tonsillectomy, vocal cord surgery
- \. Patients who have a history of ankylosing spondylitis or have a large tumor of 4 cm or more on the tongue and need an awake intubation
- \. Patients who are at risk of vomiting due to not fasting time
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, 03722, South Korea
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2019
First Posted
May 24, 2019
Study Start
June 21, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
December 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share