Study Stopped
The trial was terminated due to insufficient funds.
Restrictive Versus Liberal Rate of Extracorporeal Volume Removal Evaluation in Acute Kidney Injury
RELIEVE-AKI
REstrictive Versus LIberal Rate of Extracorporeal Volume Removal Evaluation in Acute Kidney Injury
2 other identifiers
interventional
99
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and fluid overload who are frequently treated by fluid removal during dialysis are at an increased risk of complications and death. Both slower and faster rates of fluid removal may cause injury to the vital organs. This proposed clinical trial will examine the feasibility of restrictive compared with a liberal rate of fluid removal in order to develop effective treatments for fluid overload and to improve the health of critically ill patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 5, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 26, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 29, 2025
CompletedAugust 29, 2025
August 1, 2025
2 years
March 2, 2022
June 13, 2025
August 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Delivered UFnet Rates.
A minimum separation of 0.53-0.57 mL/kg/h in mean delivered UFnet rates between the two intervention arms.
Until the end of continuous kidney replacement therapy or day 28, whichever occurs first.
No. of Participants With Protocol Deviation.
Protocol deviation defined as delivered UFnet rate that lies \>0.5 mL/kg/h outside of the target UFnet rate range for greater than six consecutive hours.
Until the end of continuous kidney replacement therapy or day 28, whichever occurs first.
Participant Recruitment/ICU/ 2 Months
An enrollment rate of 1 patient per ICU per time period.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Daily Fluid Balance (Average)
Average daily fluid balance from enrollment to ICU discharge or until day 28, whichever occurs first.
Cumulative Fluid Balance
Daily from enrollment to ICU discharge or until day 28, whichever occurs first.
Duration of Kidney Replacement Therapy
Daily from enrollment to hospital discharge or until day 28, whichever occurs first.
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
Daily from study enrollment to ICU discharge or until day 28, whichever occurs first.
Organ Failure Free Days
Daily from study enrollment to ICU discharge or until day 28, whichever occurs first.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (21)
No. of Intradialytic Hypotension Episodes
From study enrollment until 24 hours after termination of continuous kidney replacement therapy or day 28, whichever occurs first.
No. of Intradialytic Hypertension Episodes
From study enrollment until 24 hours after termination of continuous kidney replacement therapy or day 28.
No. of Episodes of Intradialytic Cardiac Arrhythmias
From study enrollment until 24 hours after termination of continuous kidney replacement therapy or day 28, whichever occurs first.
- +18 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Restrictive UFnet Strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORFluid removal will be titrated to keep net ultrafiltration rate between 0.5-1.5 mL/kg/h
Liberal UFnet Strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORFluid removal will be titrated to keep net ultrafiltration rate between 2.0-5.0 mL/kg/h
Interventions
In the restrictive group, the UFnet rate will be titrated between 0.5-1.5 mL/kg/h and maintained throughout fluid removal.
In the liberal group, the UFnet rate will be titrated between 2.0-5.0 mL/kg/h and maintained throughout fluid removal.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Stage 3 acute kidney injury according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria
- Started or intending to start CKRT for volume management
- Attending intensivist or nephrologist intending to remove net fluid using CKRT for at least 48 hours
You may not qualify if:
- Respiratory distress due to pulmonary edema or fluid overload in unintubated patients
- Massive volume infusion (i.e., \>200 mL/h for \>6 hours of continuous infusion)
- No intention to remove net fluid as determined by attending intensivist or nephrologist
- Attending intensivist or nephrologist believes that the protocol will not be followed
- Continuous net fluid removal for \>48 hours prior to study enrollment
- Patients on chronic outpatient hemodialysis
- Patients with history of, or current admission for kidney transplantation
- Patients on comfort measures only orders.
- Moribund not expected to survive \>24 hours
- Confirmed pregnancy
- Patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump
- Organ donors with neurological determination of death (i.e., brain dead donors)
- Drug overdose requiring CKRT for drug clearance
- Enrollment in a concurrent interventional clinical trial with direct impact on fluid balance (e.g., \>500 mL study drug administration)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pittsburghlead
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261, United States
Related Publications (13)
Murugan R, Kerti SJ, Chang CH, Gallagher M, Clermont G, Palevsky PM, Kellum JA, Bellomo R. Association of Net Ultrafiltration Rate With Mortality Among Critically Ill Adults With Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Normal vs Augmented Level (RENAL) of Renal Replacement Therapy Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195418. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5418.
PMID: 31173127BACKGROUNDMurugan R, Balakumar V, Kerti SJ, Priyanka P, Chang CH, Clermont G, Bellomo R, Palevsky PM, Kellum JA. Net ultrafiltration intensity and mortality in critically ill patients with fluid overload. Crit Care. 2018 Sep 24;22(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2163-1.
PMID: 30244678BACKGROUNDSerpa Neto A, Naorungroj T, Murugan R, Kellum JA, Gallagher M, Bellomo R. Heterogeneity of Effect of Net Ultrafiltration Rate among Critically Ill Adults Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Blood Purif. 2021;50(3):336-346. doi: 10.1159/000510556. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
PMID: 33027799BACKGROUNDNaorungroj T, Neto AS, Zwakman-Hessels L, Yanase F, Eastwood G, Murugan R, Kellum JA, Bellomo R. Early net ultrafiltration rate and mortality in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021 May 27;36(6):1112-1119. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa032.
PMID: 32259841BACKGROUNDNaorungroj T, Neto AS, Zwakman-Hessels L, Fumitaka Y, Eastwood G, Murugan R, Kellum JA, Bellomo R. Mediators of the Impact of Hourly Net Ultrafiltration Rate on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):e934-e942. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004508.
PMID: 32885938BACKGROUNDMurugan R, Ostermann M, Peng Z, Kitamura K, Fujitani S, Romagnoli S, Di Lullo L, Srisawat N, Todi S, Ramakrishnan N, Hoste E, Puttarajappa CM, Bagshaw SM, Weisbord S, Palevsky PM, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Ronco C. Net Ultrafiltration Prescription and Practice Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy: A Multinational Survey of Critical Care Practitioners. Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):e87-e97. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004092.
PMID: 31939807BACKGROUNDMurugan R, Bellomo R, Palevsky PM, Kellum JA. Ultrafiltration in critically ill patients treated with kidney replacement therapy. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021 Apr;17(4):262-276. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-00358-3. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
PMID: 33177700BACKGROUNDLumlertgul N, Murugan R, Seylanova N, McCready P, Ostermann M. Net ultrafiltration prescription survey in Europe. BMC Nephrol. 2020 Dec 1;21(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02184-y.
PMID: 33256635BACKGROUNDChen H, Murugan R. Survey of U.S. Critical Care Practitioners on Net Ultrafiltration Prescription and Practice among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Kidney Replacement Therapy. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2021 Nov 6;7(4):272-282. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2021-0034. eCollection 2021 Oct.
PMID: 34934817BACKGROUNDTehranian S, Shawwa K, Kashani KB. Net ultrafiltration rate and its impact on mortality in patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Clin Kidney J. 2019 Dec 17;14(2):564-569. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfz179. eCollection 2021 Feb.
PMID: 33623680BACKGROUNDNaorungroj T, Serpa Neto A, Murugan R, Kellum JA, Bellomo R. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: The Interaction between Fluid Balance and Net Ultrafiltration. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;203(9):1199-1201. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202011-4097LE. No abstract available.
PMID: 33513318BACKGROUNDKitamura K, Hayashi K, Fujitani S, Murugan R, Suzuki T. Ultrafiltration in Japanese critically ill patients with acute kidney injury on renal replacement therapy. J Intensive Care. 2021 Dec 20;9(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00590-4.
PMID: 34930481BACKGROUNDMurugan R, Chang CH, Raza M, Nikravangolsefid N, Huang DT, Palevsky PM, Kashani K; (RELIEVE-AKI) Study Investigators. Restrictive versus Liberal Rate of Extracorporeal Volume Removal Evaluation in Acute Kidney Injury (RELIEVE-AKI): a pilot clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;13(7):e075960. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075960.
PMID: 37419639DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
First, clinicians may hold firm beliefs about UFnet titration, and their awareness of treatment assignment may have led to bias in UFnet titration, specifically not to increase UFnet rates in the liberal arm. Second, we did not assess circulating intravascular volume in UFnet titration as no technology has been validated for net fluid removal.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Raghavan Murugan, MD, MS, FRCP, Principal Investigator
- Organization
- University of Pittsburgh
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Raghavan Murugan, MD, MS, FRCP
University of Pittsburgh
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2022
First Posted
April 1, 2022
Study Start
July 5, 2022
Primary Completion
June 17, 2024
Study Completion
June 26, 2024
Last Updated
August 29, 2025
Results First Posted
August 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months after the publication of the primary trial manuscript.
- Access Criteria
- Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.
The RELIEVE-AKI study investigators will review the request for data from other investigators. The investigators will execute a data-sharing agreement with the University of Pittsburgh to share de-identified data with other investigators for research purposes only. The data-sharing agreement will ensure: i.) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; ii.) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and iii.) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed on a specific date. The investigators will not release any patient identifiers in any of the data files shared with other researchers. The investigators will also require appropriate confidentiality agreements and approvals from the Institutional Review Boards of other investigators before the data are shared.